Cold Electricity Breakthrough With Two Tank Transformers! Must Watch!

[Dog-One]

You want data on the Gerard Morin experiments?

Here you go:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cALB8ZF_swU

[a.king21]

You want data on the Gerard Morin experiments?

Here you go:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cALB8ZF_swU

Good vid. Proves what I've said all along.
However, the idea of stepping up voltage  and stepping down again reminds me of Don Smith's ideas.
My opinion is that they need to step up the frequency into the khz region.
Pity he couldn't get a light bulb to light, that's the easy part.

[TinselKoala]

You want data on the Gerard Morin experiments?

Here you go:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cALB8ZF_swU

Some notes:
It's a mistake to rely on the power supply's built-in meters for power measurements. They are there for the purpose of setting the PSU to the researcher's desired voltage and current-limit range, but for any kind of quantitative measurement the voltage and current output should be measured in the usual way: by good high impedance voltmeter in parallel, and an inline low impedance ammeter or by monitoring voltage drop across an inline low-resistance current viewing resistor. Ideally this should be done with a good amount of smoothing capacitance in the output of the PSU.
In this particular "ballpark" case I'm not objecting too much, I do it myself when the input power isn't too important to what I'm showing, but it's something to bear in mind.

Next, note that the 60 watt light bulb puts a _greater load_ on the system than the dead short. Many people seem to think that a dead short represents the greatest load one can put on a generator. But it's not always the case, as I have repeatedly noted and as Russ's demonstration shows. See "maximum power transfer theorem" in your favorite reference library. This is also shown quite well when Russ hooks up the spark gap: The shorted gap is _less_ of a load than the opened gap with a spark happening in it.

Next, the voltage and current in the whole system are going to be nice sinusoidal AC, well behaved... UNTIL the spark gap is opened and making sparks. Then, all "hell" will break loose, with EMI, large HV spikes and all the measurement problems associated with those features. Yes, even "cold electricity", "radiant", that is more properly termed HV RF noise. You can see the PSU current meter fluctuating quite a bit when this starts, but the drive motor speed is constant. This means, I believe, that the meter is being affected by the EMI, not that the supply current to the motor is fluctuating that much.

Next, when the second HV transformer is connected _through the spark gap_ we now have a situation where an inductive load is being driven by a noisy, rapidly interrupted HV source. When this is done properly, using air-core tuned resonant inductors... you will experience some rather extreme phenomena, like Voltage Rise by Standing Wave Resonance (VRSWR) which is the basis of the standard Tesla Coil operation, with all the effects of such operation, like power transmission through space, vivid corona displays, "cold electricity" and so on. But in this case a cored coil is being driven without regard to resonant tuning, so the efficiencies of a true Tesla Coil system will not be attained. But... as is demonstrated, the EMI still adversely affects instruments in the near vicinity.

Next, the apparatus now is producing HF RF with a lot of noise (both audio and radio noise, but it's the radio frequency noise that is significant). There is no longer a purely sinusoidal signal in the system after the spark gap. Under these conditions, wires are no longer just "wires", they are also significant inductances, and also antennae for radiating and receiving the EMI from the noisy spark-gap-driven heavier inductors. Now it is even affecting the tachometer-- in order to get a display the instrument apparently has to be moved away from the radiators.

Next, when there is an arc happening in the vapor lamp, its resistance is quite low. As the demonstration shows at every stage, a direct short, or low resistance, is actually _less_ of a load on the system than are loads of higher impedance.

Russ, I know you have an oscilloscope or two. One wonders why you did not simply use a scope to provide a continuous and accurate monitoring of the actual frequency of the output of the AC generator, which would give you a precise RPM value, without having to hold the tachometer or struggle with its errors.  When the system includes the opened spark gap, there are things happening that you can only see by using another oscilloscope, monitoring various nodes in the circuit.

Thank you for putting together this demonstration. I'm looking forward to the next iteration, and I hope you will show some scoposcopy. There is nothing that says "Free Energy" like squiggly colored lines... or not.



--TK

[ramset]

Tinsel
Thank you for your input


truly appreciated.


respectfully
Chet

[Ed morbus]

I did this test with capacitors in parallel I get better results see diagram