Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[MarkE]

You are getting super low-level there Mark.  KISS comes to mind.

The point is that there are no subtle 6 decimal point out tricks going on.  For practice and purpose things are as shown in the graphs:  At T₀ the 2H inductor begins integrating at 0.5A/s.  Additionally, the 1H inductor carries no current.  Two seconds later we turn the MOSFET off relatively quickly.  One may assume any transition time from 10ns to 100ns.  IOW:  much less than 1us.

Our resident OU claimants appear unwilling to take any kind of crack at the circuit.  I will offer one additional hint:  This circuit is very similar to one that has been published thousands and thousands of times.

[Red_Sunset]

Hopefully the diagram above clarifies any uncertainty.

MarkE
From your explanation I hope you realize that your diagram would have better been better served by connecting the input to the supply line and driving the "PWR & INPUT" as one.
Red,

[EMJunkie]

Wow, how popular is this?

Last one till the AM:

[MileHigh]

Okay, here is an attempt to help some people out that may be intimidated by the MOSFET and the switching times and stuff like that.

Attached is a variation on the circuit.  It eliminates the MOSFET and uses a relay, and it's an ideal relay with zero switching times and zero resistance.  Otherwise it's almost an identical circuit.  You notice that a small parasitic capacitance of 100 nF was also added to the circuit.  The capacitance will not fundamentally change what the circuit does.

Feel free to with work with the relay variation of the circuit if you want.  Or work with the original.  Both circuit's behaviour will be quite similar.

[MarkE]

MarkE
From your explanation I hope you realize that your diagram would have better been better served by connecting the input to the supply line and driving the "PWR & INPUT" as one.
Red,

No, that would not work.  The supply needs to be connected from T₀ to the end of the experiment.  The center path through the MOSFET connects for the first two seconds that it takes the 1V across the 2H coil to build I1 up to 1A.  At that point the MOSFET rapidly turns-off, and what MH has been asking our OU promoters is:  "What happens then?".  It is not a complicated circuit.  And aside from the MOSFET, all the other other circuit elements have been stipulated as free of parasitics.

MH drew the circuit with just a switch in the center leg, stipulating that 1A was flowing through the 2H inductor and the center switch.  Enjoykin objected that the circuit diagram was "not proper" because MH did not show how the 1A came to flow through the 2H inductor in the first place.  This circuit applies 1V for two seconds to establish that current.  Despite accommodating the only stated objection, neither Enjoykin nor EMJ have made any attempt to answer MH's first question:  "What happens when 1A is flowing through the 2H inductor and the center path opens rapidly?".  I would think that anyone trying to argue that they know how coils work, particularly to the extent that they claim to be able to obtain free energy results that ordinary practitioners do not, should be able to deal with such a simple and idealized thought problem.