Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

EMJunkie

For the lay person, Brad or Tinman, has shown in his Rotory Transformer:

Quote

Input v: 12.80
Input amp: 0.722

= 9.2416


Output v: 10.40
Output amp: 1.639

= 17.0456


with a 1.88% Error margin.

Tinman has done an excellent job here, designing and making this device work! The Input has been De-Coupled to the satisfaction of the EE Critics? And we have had confirmation that the Output has been satisfactorily De-Coupled also. This gives a COP = 17.0456 /  9.2416 = 1.84 +- 1.88% which makes Tinman the first person to give a OU Result that is approved by the critics I believe?

Input Circuit, and Tinman's basic circuit shown below.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org 

EMJunkie

Quote from: MileHigh on June 23, 2015, 10:29:59 AM

... I challenge you to come back here and post a public apology for your incorrect statements and for your impugning the characters of good people around here.   I want to see you be just as accountable for your actions and statements as an engineer is accountable for his actions and statements.

MileHigh



@MileHigh - I believe its time to fulfill your challenge? Any last words? Ouch, gonna hurt isn't it!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

shylo

Hi Tinman, When is the best time to short the coil?
A coil has nothing in it , when it starts to pass through the field of a pm or electro, it starts to deliver flow,but at the same time as you use this delivery , an opposite reaction occurs .. Do you short the coil before this opposite reaction occurs?
This will leave very little time to use the original delivery?
But if opposition is stopped before it happens, then the output is the same as the input with no losses.
Other than friction, which is caused by gravity.
If you raise something up , but cut it off before the opposition shows up, How far can it be raised?
If it's even a miniscule amount. But won't Gravity be there, even at the smallest level?
Do the use of electronics give us that advantage?
Does the abrupt opening or closing of a electrical flow open the door to ambient energy?

I think there should be a Thread just for those whom love to argue.
artv

Pirate88179

Quote from: shylo on June 23, 2015, 08:22:09 PM

I think there should be a Thread just for those whom love to argue.
artv


No there shouldn't.

(Sorry, I watched too many Monty Python shows as a teen)

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

picowatt

Quote from: EMJunkie on June 23, 2015, 07:37:38 PM
For the lay person, Brad or Tinman, has shown in his Rotory Transformer:

with a 1.88% Error margin.

Tinman has done an excellent job here, designing and making this device work! The Input has been De-Coupled to the satisfaction of the EE Critics? And we have had confirmation that the Output has been satisfactorily De-Coupled also. This gives a COP = 17.0456 /  9.2416 = 1.84 +- 1.88% which makes Tinman the first person to give a OU Result that is approved by the critics I believe?

Input Circuit, and Tinman's basic circuit shown below.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

I find what Tinman has shared with us quite interesting.  And yes, even my "probability meter" has moved a bit.  But I am not at all prepared to jump to the conclusions you apparently are.  Possibly you assume too much...

The jury is still out on this one, and I hope Tinman will continue to share measurements and any info he can with us.

PW