Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[synchro1]

You are so off the wall that it is entertaining in a way.  Apparently unable to make any connection to your quoted passage, you have decided to drop a different load of BS.  Do you have the foggiest idea what the meaning is of even half the terms you string together? 

First, kindly find a reputable reference for "Impulse Magnetization events" that describes how such an event differs from other types of magnetization "events".

Second, kindly find a reputable reference that describes what it is about a laminated core that "mitigates" the event, and just what about the event it is that the laminated construction mitigates.

Third, explain what doesn't have its own BH curve, such that it is significant that a laminated core "has it's (sic) own BH curve".

Fourth, find a reputable reference for a "magnet wave" that describes what propagates and through what medium.

Fifth, find a reputable reference that describes "Lenz propulsion".

Sixth, find a reputable reference that asserts that "Lenz propulsion" occurs due to viscous remnance.

You will of course not be able to do these things, nor is it likely that you will even make a passing effort at trying.  We can look forward to your next vector off into a new set of bushes with yet another fresh bowl of word salad.You have yet to establish that any of these things you claim occur.Force is not power is not energy.Since you are making quantitative claims perhaps you would be good enough to show specifically how through measurement or calculation that you arrived at those values.

@MarkE,

That's a full work load! Why not start with a little brush up on your own?

[synchro1]

Driving a magnet rotor by discharge pulse should permit a pulse shuttle between caps that conserves the power. I didn't realize this was possible. I've never seen anyone perform that trick before.

Let's say we charge a coil with a battery through a DPDT switch wired to diodes. The coil's interupted and discharged back to the battery as a rotor magnet passes, what effect would that have on the passing magnet? This is backwards of course, from imparting a power pulse. A vaccum effect! Would the power from the field collapse be sufficient to drive the rotor? This approach improves over the Universal Motor commutators with a Reed switch.

The rotor magnet would be drawn toward the coil pole, then at TDC the coil discharges and reverses polarity producing a repulsive kick, and the power's back stored in the battery. The coil just needs enough windings to raise the voltage over the battery's. This should make a self runner.

What's unique about this concept is that the power pulse sends current from the coil to the battery, unlike the other way, which delivers power from the battery to the coil for the power pulse. Anyone ever seen an electric motor run that way? Tinman's been spearheading this frontier of experimentation. 

[MarkE]

@MarkE,

That's a full work load! Why not start with a little brush up on your own?

Theya re your baffle gab assertions. You can attempt to justify them or run away.  I care not.

[synchro1]

Theya re your baffle gab assertions. You can attempt to justify them or run away.  I care not.

@MarkE,

You should learn to keep your trap shut. I'm not jumping through hoops for you like a circus dog. I'm an inventer not a pedant.

[synchro1]

I am no expert in this,, but trying what you have suggested did not "suck or push" the magnet into or away from the collapsing coil,, it only made for a weaker interactive moment between the coil and magnet,, and the recovery from the coil was not so great either.

Of course,, I did not have nor use any fancy equipment to get exact,, as in very exact, readings for anything,, only that the motor used a little less and gave about the same less if not maybe a little more less.

This lead me to believe that the field did not "reverse" polarity so much as reverse between an expanding and a collapsing field,, like letting the air out of a balloon.

BUT,, I could be wrong

@webby1,

Thank you for that.