Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 137 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

Quote from: partzman on October 26, 2015, 09:49:54 AM
MH,

The authors in their test I'm referring to actually use a stepped current source of 180ma into the primary of the transformer under test instead of a voltage source.  Again I would encourage you to read the paper and note the diffusion of flux into the core over time plus the rapid developing H field between the core limbs. 

partzman

I did a five-minute skim through the paper.  So I still can't comment on it in any kind of definitive way.  I would have to refresh all my EM and other theory and then read the paper very slowly and carefully to honestly comment on it and that's too much work for me.  It appears to me that they are looking at H propagating at the speed of light around an electromagnet and the the related B field.  I can't say if it makes sense or not without doing a ton of work that I am not prepared to do.  All that I can say is that if extraordinary claims are being made then they don't smell right at all to me.

It's impossible to put a stepped current source into a coil, but you can approximate one.  The flipping of the magnetic domains is a mechanical process that requires the overcoming of inertia, which is just a mechanical inductance.  I honestly don't believe that you will find anything remarkable or unusual when you analyze a coil around a core that can't be explained by conventional EM theory.

QuoteTM if you are watching this, would you take this measurement and report your findings please. I would also encourage you to continue with this project on this forum as it does exhibit unique characteristics. You deserve credit for your device and I fear that someone lurking this thread without the best intentions could hijack your discovery.

If you are trying to suggest it's me when you say "without the best intentions" then say it right now, no B.S.  Are you talking about me or not?

If you are indeed suggesting it's me then stop the nonsense right now.  I am arguing solid real-world tech with Tinman.  I am not casting spells and incantations.  Stop playing the Boogeyman card about me, it's ridiculous.  If you want to find a Boogeyman then go out trick or treating on Halloween.

shylo

How will you learn if your not willing?
Therioes change , if anybody thinks we have all the right answers ,their sadly mistaken.
artv

Dog-One

Quote from: partzman on October 27, 2015, 06:15:56 PM
IMO, the way the world situation is shaping up, we have little time left to provide any help from the energy arena.  I figure at the rate we're going we'll run out of time so, this post is meant to stir things up a bit!

I believe that TM's device is capable (from what I've seen) of producing OU with proper configuration. I believe this from my own experience of which I'm willing to share certain info.

I've attached a paper which demonstrates passive OU from a simple device. It is certainly not an answer in itself but hopefully will serve to widen some horizons.

When reading the Math channel results, convert the mvv readings to mw.

partzman

Yes, the HTT is not a device found in commercial applications that I am aware of and regardless of how I or Brad thinks it works, there is something there that needs to be exercised and exploited.  I also highly agree with Vortex1 in putting this device in a loop configuration, though I personally prefer a more obvious approach using a controlled signal input and rectified/filtered output.  My goal is to complete a solid prototype and see if loop operation is possible.  If it is and I can do it, I'll leave it to the eggheads to figure out how it works while I build a thousand more of them.  I'm not going to debate electrical and magnetic concepts from this point forward.  I know just enough to finish what Brad started and I'll leave it at that.

Wish me luck or call me an idiot.  I'm not offended either way.

picowatt

Quote from: partzman on October 27, 2015, 06:15:56 PM
IMO, the way the world situation is shaping up, we have little time left to provide any help from the energy arena.  I figure at the rate we're going we'll run out of time so, this post is meant to stir things up a bit!

I believe that TM's device is capable (from what I've seen) of producing OU with proper configuration. I believe this from my own experience of which I'm willing to share certain info.

I've attached a paper which demonstrates passive OU from a simple device. It is certainly not an answer in itself but hopefully will serve to widen some horizons.

When reading the Math channel results, convert the mvv readings to mw.

partzman

Partzman,

I took a look at your pdf and frankly, I am a bit confused.

You seem to be comparing the power dissipated by R1 in the first scope capture to something more closely resembling the total power input from the signal generator in the second capture.

Can you explain your reasoning for the measurement points and the math used?

I must be missing something...

Thanks,
PW 


Jimboot

Quote from: MileHigh on October 27, 2015, 06:49:22 PM

If you are trying to suggest it's me when you say "without the best intentions" then say it right now, no B.S.  Are you talking about me or not?

If you are indeed suggesting it's me then stop the nonsense right now.  I am arguing solid real-world tech with Tinman.  I am not casting spells and incantations.  Stop playing the Boogeyman card about me, it's ridiculous.  If you want to find a Boogeyman then go out trick or treating on Halloween.
geez paranoid much? I certainly didn't think he was referring to anyone. From my point of view it looks as though Brad jumped through everyone's hoops and people still inferring his measurements are wrong somehow? I'm already on a build and I'm sure others are too.  [/size][size=78%]I think a self runner is the only thing that would satisfy this hoax weary audience. [/size]