Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[shylo]

Are Lenz and flyback the same thing?
If so then my generator uses this to motor itself.
All those fancy equations just boggle my mind. lol
Just wondering artv

[EMJunkie]

Are Lenz and flyback the same thing?
If so then my generator uses this to motor itself.
All those fancy equations just boggle my mind. lol
Just wondering artv

Hey Shylo

No, different. If you loaded the Inductive Collapse, the wave would change, from a sharp spike to a not so sharp spike. Lenz is responsible for the change in the wave. As Current in the Coil builds, so does an opposing Magnetic Field to the Collapsing Magnetic Field. Thus the Collapsing Field slows down and the Spike wave form will change.

Actually, the Flyback, or Inductive Collapse is Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction, Its simply the Changing Magnetic Field in Proximity of the Conductor. So this process, "Generates" Electrical Energy! Problem is you had to spend X to get it in the First Place anyway!

Thus: E = 1/2 LI ²

Lenz is the Drag on a Rotor when EMF is Generated and Loaded, its the Restrictive force, its what restricts the motoring forward of your rotor.

Thats why Lenz is Negative (-) its the reflectance of the Prime Mover Action. Limiting the Prime Mover Action's effectiveness.


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[ramset]

EMJ
You started this thread with an undeniable Zeal ,an" in your face" approach that most here were strongly encouraged by

after it was pointed out to you that you had made some significant errors and assumptions things changed dramatically.

it seems there is nothing simple about even the simplest circuits when in the hands of the Layman ! and it is all too easy
to make claims from the laymans Bench?

Running too an investigation is the true scientific method.


TinMan runs to the investigation ,a wonderful example

you should try leading from in front  ,...[you started this thread in front]
instead of from Behind .[just posting other peoples  work now]

it got old a long long time ago !

you should Clear the air around here, one way or another !
or keep trying to lead from behind .

just one mans opinion ![probably Not ?]

Chet K

[EMJunkie]

Chet K

The only Assumptions that have errors in them, are, and always have been, everyone here that jumped in boots and all, building a circuit, that I presented from Stan Meyer! All with no further study of my presented Work.

The only errors ever made on this thread are the incompleteness of your efforts.

Had you investigated PROPERLY, had you LISTENED, had you used an insy bit of Common-sense, but I did expect nothing else... Simply failure by the masses here is exactly what I expected.

Thats why I chose to release a Circuit from someone else: You are telling the world that Stan Meyer was wrong!!!

When we know for sure, he was not!!!

A team of Electrical Engineers / Technicians have just recently, independantly replicated the exact same device. One particular person just recently told you of some of their results:

ALL,

I have been a member here since 2010. You will not find any posts prior to this due to seeing too many personal attacks on this site.
Chris is trying to share something with all of you, and all he asks is that you replicate his experiment to see the effect that he has been studying for 15 years.
Typically a tank circuit will have a Q and as you load that circuit the Q will diminish.  By using Chris's method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils, when you add a load to the tank circuit it still retains a high Q with the addition of the load. Utilizing the method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils we currently are lighting a 12V light bulb and the circuit is retaining a Q of over 20.
I would hope that you are all open minded enough to replicate Chris' work and find out for yourself.  If you learn nothing else you will at least see an unexpected unique effect.

Again Ramset, your incompetence is not something I have control of!!!

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org



P.S: I have 53 Videos on my YouTube Channel, most of which are Public Videos, most all are Experiments I have shared, Experiments I have very clearly shown for many years. None of you studied and replicated any of them.

While you use Tinman as an example of stellar, you sit in your Arm Chair and Clap your hands, but really, the only person learning anything is Tinman!!!

[EMJunkie]

Most everyone is totally missing the point of all this.

Any and every demonstration of anything that is not understood by the observer will never be anything more than a MAGIC SHOW.

History has proven this many thousands of times! None learnt anything from any of the great Demonstrations ever!!!

Just recently I released a Video, it confirms the Electron Positron Pair work of Ioannis Xydous, his work is now called: E/M Inertial Warp Drive

My video: Inertial Mass Displacement - An amazing effect - What does a Coil really do on the core? - hyiq.org

How many times do you need to be shown something before you pick up the Ball?


The game is Life and you need to participate!!!


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org