Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Chris
Maybe someone's already mentioned this but fwiw...
Considering Spin Theory, if we get 2 spin waves travelling toward each other along oppositely wound coils on a shared same core, are we not going to get a standing wave where they meet?

It would seem to me that if we put a pickup coil at this particular point where the standing wave manifests, we can draw excess energy from the standing wave without taking anything away from what's being produced in the individual sets of windings. In this sense, we would effectively have a cop>1, would we not?
Bob

Edit: Just noticed a little bit of Spin Theory chat above - no time to read, back to work. Hope I didn't duplicate what's already been said.

Hi Bob,

Yes we should see a Standing Wave!

I believe this is entirely a Matter Wave, or a De Broglie Wave, but I need to do some more investigation here.

There is, I believe a Propagation Delay, this is the reason we see a "Movement", as its a Traveling Standing Wave in Space.

No, none is covered above.

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[tinman]

Hey Brad - Yes happy to discuss, its a valid and sensible topic.

When you say:


Havent I already done this?

Paramagnetic:
   Possessing Un-Paired Electrons (E-) - In attraction to an external Magnetic Field - Spin +1/2 (Low Energy State)

Diamagnetic:
   Lacking Un-Paired Electrons (E-) - In repulsion to an external Magnetic Field - Spin -1/2 (High Energy State)

The actual Charge Value of the Electrons depend on:
   1: The Element in the Periodic Table
   2: The Orbital of that Electron
   3: The state of the Electron

E.G:

Tungsten (Paramagnetic), 74 Electrons, 6 different States.

Bismuth (Diamagnetic), 83 Electrons, 6 different States.

However, the Formal Charge:


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

Do you not see a problem with the picture you posted? 


Brad

[EMJunkie]

I see lots of room for inaccuracy's for anyone wanting to measure and count the Charges in the Atomic Structures.

I see that the spin states and other factors define the Magnetic property of the Material Element.

I see that many Elements are bound to Electron States and can only change is an external force is applied.

I could go on, but I should ask you, what have you found?

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[tinman]

I see lots of room for inaccuracy's for anyone wanting to measure and count the Charges in the Atomic Structures.

I see that the spin states and other factors define the Magnetic property of the Material Element.

I see that many Elements are bound to Electron States and can only change is an external force is applied.

I could go on, but I should ask you, what have you found?

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

The picture on the left is the very same as the picture on the right--there is no difference between the two.


Brad

[EMJunkie]

The picture on the left is the very same as the picture on the right--there is no difference between the two.


Brad

Brad, You mean this Picture:

or the next picture down:


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org