Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[thx1138]

The first post shown in post #7032 is actually Floyd Sweet's Space Quanta Modulator (SQM). It was the precursor to the Vacuum Triode Amplifier (VTA) which is actually a name Tom Bearden gave the later device.

What most people miss about the Hendershot Magnatronic is that it uses a 3-pole magnet from a radar magnetron. The two outer poles are the same polarity and the center pole is the opposite polarity of the outer poles. That makes the magnet essentially the same as the SQM setup but the Hendershot Magnatronic uses an "armature" and "ringer coils" rather than wrapping the coils on the ferrite rod. Photos of both the Hendershot and Aho builds clearly show the 3-pole magnet but it is shown as two poles in the schematics except for Ed Skilling's schematic. Skilling's schematic shows three poles but the polarities are not marked.

I obtained a 1940's telephone ringer and found that the ringer coils have Permalloy cores which is about the same as HyMu80 - just different brand names. They are both ~80% nickel and ~20% iron. The beauty of Permalloy is that it will support much higher frequencies because of its magnetic properties and has very, very low remanence. This material is still used today to shield magnetic compasses in aircraft. BTW, the 1940's ringer still worked fine before I took it apart to remove the coils and the cores had no detectable magnetic field after 70+ years of being magnetized and demagnetized.

Both the 3-pole radar magnetron magnet and the use of permalloy point to Hendershot's air force connections. I read an article from back in the day that aviators of the time were surprised that Lindbergh found England so accurately. They said he could have ended up anywhere from Norway to North Africa with the dead reckoning navigation of the day. I think Hendershot may have used permalloy to shield Lindbergh's compass and that was Hendershot's contribution to the flight rather than auxiliary power.

Here's some info on Sweet's SQM vs Hendershot's Magnatronic. Note the difference between the steel armature and the HyMu80 armature on a radar magnetron magnet. That's the "magnetic bubble".
http://s25.postimg.org/mbc6dfvtb/Space_Quanta_Modulator2.jpg

A note for Morpher44: I don't have a google account and probably won't ever get one so I'm posting this here rather than on your video site. The paraffin Hendershot used in the coils is not an electret by itself. Making an electret requires a specific mix of waxes and it has to be charged with a uniform field of thousands of volts while it cools which would be hard, if not impossible, while it is in the basket weave coil. The paraffin is, however, a dielectric material and has about the same dielectric constant as the paper used in the Hendershot "CapCoil", as I call it. It is between the capacitor part and the coil part which means it is direct contact with the coil wires' insulation.

A couple of links about the "magnetic bubble":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVhGQaESKEI&feature=g-u-u
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZBdvTrmHyY&feature=youtu.be Start at 43:24 on this one. Then you might want to go back and watch the entire video.

[EMJunkie]

@thx1138 - I am sorry in advance.

The concept of "Magnetic Bubbles" is rubbish. I agree with most of your post, but this sort of stuff, "Magnetic Bubbles", needs to be stopped!

There is no such thing, its rubbish just the same as the alleged "Conditioning" of the Magnets. John Bedini now, as of EFV 30 admits that he thinks the "Conditioning" was a Hoax.

Many thousands of devices before Floyd Sweet worked with none of this Fantasy BS. One can take any large Magnet off the shelf and get a pattern like you show. This is nothing amazing and nothing special, it certianly does not and never will prove any Fantasy BS that any should go wildly chasing. Floyd Sweet said:

We can see that the model's origins likely arose from the operation called "flux cutting", a most deceiving and misleading term. A better term, "time varying flux modulation", does not imply any separation of lines of flux. Truly, lines of flux are always in closure upon themselves and are mathematically expressed as line integrals. It is fallacious to use the term "cutting", which implies time varying separation which does not in fact ever occur. A motionally induced E-field is actually created within the space occupied by the moving magnetic flux described above. This field is present therein, whether or not a conductor is present in the space.

A Magnetic Field will always take the shortest symetrical path.

I am all for free speech, but when it is nothing but missleading for the masses, I am totally against it!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[Utopia Now]

Hello Guys I found this video on YouTube,  about magnet field lines shown on an old TV   like Floyd Sweet also showed in one of his video`s.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYf_7VRrYeU

Does anyone have a link to that video.

Very interesting to see the round Bar Magnet inside the ring magnetron Magnet.

[EMJunkie]

Hello Guys I found this video on YouTube,  about magnet field lines shown on an old TV   like Floyd Sweet also showed in one of his video`s.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYf_7VRrYeU

Does anyone have a link to that video.

Very interesting to see the round Bar Magnet inside the ring magnetron Magnet.

Enjoy:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

Hello Guys I found this video on YouTube,  about magnet field lines shown on an old TV   like Floyd Sweet also showed in one of his video`s.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYf_7VRrYeU

Does anyone have a link to that video.

Very interesting to see the round Bar Magnet inside the ring magnetron Magnet.

Continued:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org