Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[hyiq]

I see a very big mistake in the image Chris,and would more than likely explain the large difference in P/in and P/out.
You pride your self in induction Chris,so where do you see the big NO NO in the picture below-the one you posted.
Where has GG made a big error ?.

Many people have looked at this picture,and the video's,but no one yet see's the error 

Brad

Brad - The Image you provided is simply NOT showing any Power Measurements, the Image I provided is Showing Power Measurements!


The Image you provided, has an issue in it, that is NOT present in the Image I provided...


You're grasping at straws and foolishness to try to prove me wrong.


I have never disagreed with you more, there is pure logic here and you're failing to see it.


I suggest you watch the video again and see why the Current was disconnected, and see that is was disconnected WELL AFTER showing all the CORRECT Measurements FIRST!!!


Who the hell are you working for Brad???


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org




P.S: You're talking about the Toroidal Choke on the Current on the Input?


No, I disagree, simply, the Scope verified the measurements and the same Choke was not in the Scope Circuit. I disagree. If there was a bunch of Spikes in there, and the Meters were cheap rubbish, maybe, but the input was mostly Sine in Nature, and the Scope eliminated this also. Meter sampling @ 5GHZ also is a bonus, so any noise, which was nearly not present at all would have been mostly accounted for anyway.

[tinman]

Brad - The Image you provided is simply NOT showing any Power Measurements, the Image I provided is Showing Power Measurements!


The Image you provided, has an issue in it, that is NOT present in the Image I provided...


You're grasping at straws and foolishness to try to prove me wrong.


I have never disagreed with you more, there is pure logic here and you're failing to see it.


I suggest you watch the video again and see why the Current was disconnected, and see that is was disconnected WELL AFTER showing all the CORRECT Measurements FIRST!!!


Who the hell are you working for Brad???


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org




P.S: You're talking about the Toroidal Choke on the Current on the Input?


No, I disagree, simply, the Scope verified the measurements and the same Choke was not in the Scope Circuit. I disagree. If there was a bunch of Spikes in there, and the Meters were cheap rubbish, maybe, but the input was mostly Sine in Nature, and the Scope eliminated this also. Meter sampling @ 5GHZ also is a bonus, so any noise, which was nearly not present at all would have been mostly accounted for anyway.

Chris
The image is the one you provided-not the one i provided.

There is a big mistake made,and it is in the image you provided-the one in my last post,

Do you see the flaw that will provide incorrect power measurements for both the CH meter,and the scope.
Use your induction skills Chris.


Brad

[tinman]

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org







, and the Scope eliminated this also. Meter sampling @ 5GHZ also is a bonus, so any noise, which was nearly not present at all would have been mostly accounted for anyway.

You're grasping at straws and foolishness to try to prove me wrong.

i am grasping at reality Chris,and i need no foolishness to prove you wrong-i can do that just by asking you to provide evidence to back up your POC claim's.

I have never disagreed with you more, there is pure logic here and you're failing to see it.

Logic tells us that there is a measurement error,and that error can be seen in the picture you provided-along with the fact that there has not(and never will be)a replication showing the same results GG showed--Where has he gone?.

Who the hell are you working for Brad???

The CIA 
Really Chris?.

P.S: You're talking about the Toroidal Choke on the Current on the Input?

Are you saying this will have no impact on what the CH meter read's?.

No, I disagree, simply, the Scope verified the measurements and the same Choke was not in the Scope Circuit.

Is the scope's current probe before or after the choke?
Did the CH meter and scope also account for the power driving the H bridge ?--the answer to that is no.

I disagree. If there was a bunch of Spikes in there, and the Meters were cheap rubbish, maybe, but the input was mostly Sine in Nature

So the current wave form is a sine,and both the input and output current lead's 0n the P/in CH meter, are wrapped around a toroid core. --but this is only on the input CH meter,reading P/in--but not on CH meter reading the P/out.

If the CH meters are that good,why the need for a current choke ?-and only on the input meter

I know you may not want to Chris,as the truth often hurt's when it go's against what we want to believe,but dig a little deeper,and put your induction smarts to work.


Brad

[hyiq]

i am grasping at reality Chris,and i need no foolishness to prove you wrong-i can do that just by asking you to provide evidence to back up your POC claim's.

Logic tells us that there is a measurement error,and that error can be seen in the picture you provided-along with the fact that there has not(and never will be)a replication showing the same results GG showed--Where has he gone?.

The CIA 
Really Chris?.

Are you saying this will have no impact on what the CH meter read's?.

Is the scope's current probe before or after the choke?
Did the CH meter and scope also account for the power driving the H bridge ?--the answer to that is no.

So the current wave form is a sine,and both the input and output current lead's 0n the P/in CH meter, are wrapped around a toroid core. --but this is only on the input CH meter,reading P/in--but not on CH meter reading the P/out.

If the CH meters are that good,why the need for a current choke ?-and only on the input meter

I know you may not want to Chris,as the truth often hurt's when it go's against what we want to believe,but dig a little deeper,and put your induction smarts to work.


Brad

Brad, this is all just foolishness, I know, you know and Chet K knows...

It is very clear that you're attempting to dismiss the obvious, to Bemean and to Denounce the technology I am sharing, and this means that you have an agenda behind your intentions.

It started by:

   Current was "By-Passed" - I proved you wrong!
   Then "all the output power did not go through-or was measured by  the scope or CH meter's" - I proved you wrong!
   Then  "Toroidal Choke on the Current on the Input" will distort readings - I also proved you Wrong!

Now really, the only one here that needs to get a grip on reality, is you and your foolishness!

Hi Marc. To what generator of mine are you referring to in your comment on the video?. With regards to what you are seeing in your setup,pay very close attention to !what i call! eddy current relief of the core.  Keep up the good work.

Brad, I used to have the utmost respect for you, but seeing how you deceived the people following your RT work, was a real eye opener for me!

Your RT used the same size Motor as I used! The Bore, inside the Coils is only 15mm across, now here you are telling people that the secret is inside the Bore: 3mm Wall thickness x 2  + 3mm Wall thickness x 2  + 4mm Wall thickness x 2  - NOT Including diameter of the Magnet - Not including the diameter of the extra Coil you mentioned...

That was a real eye opener for me Brad, I was actually shocked at how easy you carried out this deception.



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[hyiq]

Most readers wont know, but Brad works for Chet K, many here do!

Chet K is working for Mark Goldes, and others (The Highest Bidder scenario), and Chet K is actively employing Cyiril Smith (Smudge) (X Chava Energy - Mark Goldes Employee), GotoLuc, TinselKoala (Scope Purchase Incident...), and many others! 

Working behind closed doors to profit from others Hard Work and Ideas!!! Exactly as all of Mark Goldes multitude of Companies through out history!!!

See now why there is SO MUCH ACTIVE DENIAL!!!


MileHigh was employed to divert active attention from Important information... After not hearing from him for a year or so!!!


Brad saying "He knows his stuff" when for years Brad has argued to the contrary!!!

For those that do not know, Mark Goldes has a very bad rep: Amazing Perpetual Swindling Machine: ...... Mark Goldes' Fraudulent "AESOP Institute"



Chava actively tell people they are: "Chava is in no way involved with Mark Goldes"

I mean, 25+ years in business and never any product to sell???

Beware everyone, there are a lot of very very questionable people here an elsewhere.


  Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


This information is what got me moderated on username: EMJunkie