Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

Started by ramset, April 26, 2015, 09:52:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

Some steel towers were still partially standing after atomic bombs were blownup at the top of them in tests

tinman

Quote from: MileHigh on April 30, 2015, 10:05:58 AM
Trust me, he couldn't punch his way out of a wet paper bag when it came to electronics.  When he arrived at OUR to pitch his circuit, it was absolutely shocking to see how clueless he was.  This was a _physics professor_ and in first year physics they teach you basic electronics.

I sent an email to Poynt, ION, and perhaps TK saying how shocked I was that a physics professor could come an present a simple circuit and seem so completely lost and clueless.

I am telling you in all sincerity that I was shocked.  Shocked because there was no comparison at all between this guy and the real physics professors that I encountered at school.  I don't know how he managed to get away with that while being on the payroll.
Well MH,he is a physics professor,not an EE-->there is a big difference.

I started life as a motor cycle mechanic,then moved onto HD mechanics,and then onto mechanical engineering. I now have my degree in all three. Just to throw a spanner in the work's,i also did my four year degree in green keeping lol-that was different,but it has come in handy. I now drive trucks for a living. I have all these skill's,but my grade with electronics and useing the scope is junior-->my spelling is also crap.

So just because we know our way around one thing,dosnt mean we are gun at another.

MileHigh

I doesn't matter Brad, what you have shown is not proof of anything except the examples you are showing are true.

I gave you the logical reasoning for why the towers would fall.  If you have a source of heat power, and you cannot evacuate that heat power fast enough, then the temperature must increase.  It's the same thing for a car engine.  It's just the physical reality and it can't be ignored.

MileHigh

QuoteWell MH,he is a physics professor,not an EE-->there is a big difference.

Nope, because physics and basic electronics are exactly the same thing.  In junior college physics courses they typically teach you about capacitors and inductors and how they work.  That was my experience.

As far as I am concerned, it is essentially impossible for any physics professor to not be able to demonstrate complete competency with basic electronic circuits.  And that means that you use differential and integral equations to explain how capacitors and inductors work and you use the same equations to show how simple circuits work.

A real physics professor is supposed to be ROCK SOLID when it comes to this stuff.  They should know it as a reflex, without really having to think.

How do you calculate the escape velocity for Earth?   Do you think the average physics professor needs to remember the formula?  They answer is they don't.   They can simply derive it on paper using basic calculus in one minute flat.  That's a real physics professor.

tinman

Quote from: MileHigh on April 30, 2015, 10:38:22 AM
I doesn't matter Brad, what you have shown is not proof of anything except the examples you are showing are true.

I gave you the logical reasoning for why the towers would fall.  If you have a source of heat power, and you cannot evacuate that heat power fast enough, then the temperature must increase.  It's the same thing for a car engine.  It's just the physical reality and it can't be ignored.
MH
In order for the temperature to rise,you must increase the oxygen(or an oxident of some type),or the heat will never reach a high level-->this is physics that determonds this,not me. The same go's for a car engine-->when dose it reach higher temperatures-->when the throttle is open full,or only half open?-disconect the cooling fan,and try it your self.

I stand by what i say,and that is-the fire alone never got close to being hot enough to bring down those buildings.This has been proven time and time again by those that know,and are not under the shadow of the government.

There are so many holes and untruths about that whole deal that just dont fit. 6 of the blokes that were suppose to be flying those planes are still alive today-->how is that?. One of the planes was still listed as ! in service! until 2006. We could go on for ever here,and this thread will take a dive in the wrong direction like so many have before.

So i say now,we either open a sepperate thread,or maybe there is an existing one here on OU,or we just say-each to there own,and leave it at that.

Agree or disagree MH,i do appreciate you being civil-->unlike some here. This is why i have respect for you and others like you. Even though we dont always agree,we tend to get along .

Cheers