'Impossible' rocket drive works and could get to Moon in four hours

[MarkE]

@minnieI would agree, I just get a little irritated when it is implied that we should just believe a person or group because they may belong to a certain group.

Who says such things?

We have big problems that are not being addressed because some believe certain groups should not be questioned where I question everything and everyone. In any case my problem is not science persay but people who abuse it and on that matter I think we can all agree.

Appeal to authority is just another logical fallacy.

AC

[MarkE]

A statement by Wayne on their website says:

In 2008, I discovered how to turn Buoyancy "off and on" very quickly, very cheaply, regardless of the force required.

The claim is false.

In 2009 I invented a way to utilize that discovery in the form of a self contained and fuel-less system to supply net excess energy to consumers.

The claim is false.

We developed 7 prototypes, developing and improving the system, we have just finished our Data collection model, and have our Beta modeled.

The data collection claims were circa 2012.  To this day Wayne Travis does not have any machine that self-powers and delivers surplus energy as he claims.

It's now 2015 (7 years later), so where is it?  It either doesn't work as claimed, or it's currently being suppressed by TPTB, at which time it may be released to the public in the future if/when TPTB decides it can further their own hidden agenda.  And, assuming it does work as claimed, then who's to say Wayne isn't another pawn for TPTB as Einstein was?

LOL, sure that's it, the crackpots are stooges for the TPTB.  You should think on that proposition of yours long and hard.

Gravock

[MarkE]

Minnie,

I must say, the "Travis effect" is really interesting.  Thanks for bringing this to our attention!  It clearly shows there's a greater force in regards to the potential difference between the atmospheric pressure and the gravitational force, which is in-line with what I have been saying.

Gravock

Perhaps you would be good enough to describe the "Travis Effect" and how it represents anything other than ordinary buoyancy.

[gravityblock]

Appeal to authority is just another logical fallacy.

It is you who has been requesting empirical evidence from an authoritative source, thus it is you who has been making the appeals to authority.  This is your logical fallacy and not ours.  MarkE proves himself wrong once again, ROFLMAO!

Gravock

[MarkE]

It is you who has been requesting empirical evidence from an authoritative source, thus it is you who has been making the appeals to authority.  This is your logical fallacy and not ours.  MarkE proves himself wrong once again, ROFLMAO!

Gravock

LOL, apparently you either do not understand what appeal to authority is or choose to misrepresent it.