Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.

Started by synchro1, August 05, 2015, 08:20:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 26
User actions

Jimboot

#50
August 09, 2015, 08:14:43 PM
Well my cap doubled over night from 20mv to 40mv using the copper plates. So no flouros. SHipping container is a great faraday cage. I'll be putting this one aside for now, not sure where the 20mv came from but not that exciting compared to other devices . I probably doing something wrong .

MarkE

#51
August 09, 2015, 09:11:58 PM
Quote from: TinselKoala on August 09, 2015, 06:38:26 PM
Can you give a link to a video where Stiffler shows it working _with_ the magnets, then he _removes_ the magnets and shows that it no longer works?
If he is using the neos as an antenna then removing them will cause the output to fall, particularly if he has made the physical arrangement resonant to a signal source.  IMO if you want to discount RF then a Faraday cage and a spectrum analyzer are needed.

pomodoro

#52
August 10, 2015, 02:08:24 AM
Quote from: MarkE on August 09, 2015, 09:11:58 PM
If he is using the neos as an antenna then removing them will cause the output to fall, particularly if he has made the physical arrangement resonant to a signal source.  IMO if you want to discount RF then a Faraday cage and a spectrum analyzer are needed.

The Doc is a Radio Ham, https://radioreference.com/apps/ham/callsign/WA7RTQ .

MarkE

#53
August 10, 2015, 02:16:01 AM
Quote from: pomodoro on August 10, 2015, 02:08:24 AM
The Doc is a Radio Ham, https://radioreference.com/apps/ham/callsign/WA7RTQ .
Well then one should expect more than just fluorescent lights to be big emitters in his home.

synchro1

#54
August 10, 2015, 06:37:25 AM
Everyone knows I got great results with two powerful 3/4" diametric tubes seated inside the aircore of a 26 gauge Tesla wraped bifilar 1 1/2" spool. I live in the great north woods and tried this miles from nowhere with equal success. There's really something else aside from RF going on here with what I'm calling the (Cook Battery Effect).
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 26
User actions