New reactionless motor from India

[tinman]

@Gravityblock


I once built PM motor which would not generate and I posted the plans for it here in the forums. It was interesting because it had a strong motor action however no matter how fast it was rotated it would not generate any voltage.


Now if we can build a motor which will not generate then why not a generator which will not motor?. In a motor the generator action generates a Cemf in opposition to the applied Emf limiting current. At which point we might ask what function does the motoring action play in a generator and what are the consequences of removing the motor function?.






AC

A shaded pole motor dose not generate,so just build the opposite to one of them,and you have a generator that will have no motor effect 

[MarkE]

Call it whatever you want, but it doesn't change what it is.  Most people have adopted the analogy of a heat pump's COP to represent a system that is greater than unity.  I replaced COP > 1 with OU in my statement below.

MarkE and his minions can no longer use the argument that a system isn't OU if it can't be self-looped.  That argument is wrong based on a false assumption, as previously shown.

Gravock

Oh, I see you have propped up and slain another lovely straw man.

[gravityblock]

Oh, I see you have propped up and slain another lovely straw man.

I have successfully refuted your original argument and position that a system isn't OU if it can't be self-looped.  I did not refute an argument that wasn't advanced by you, as you falsely assert.  You're false assertion that "I have propped up and slain another lovely straw man" is an appeal to emotion.

Gravock

[MarkE]

I have successfully refuted your original argument and position that a system isn't OU if it can't be self-looped.  I did not refute an argument that wasn't advanced by you, as you falsely assert.  You're false assertion that "I have propped up and slain another lovely straw man" is an appeal to emotion.

Gravock

Then you have defeated a straw man of your own invention.  Be my guest:  Show where I allegedly made the argument you claim. 

[gravityblock]

Then you have defeated a straw man of your own invention.  Be my guest:  Show where I allegedly made the argument you claim.

No, the straw man was your own invention based on a false assertion.  You continue to assert you didn't make an argument that was successfully refuted, without stating and clarifying your original argument and position.  You have done this so you can continue to muddy the waters.

Gravock