MH's ideal coil and voltage question

[tinman]

A repost, just in case:

Here, I found something for you to contemplate:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/resonance

Definition of "resonance:"

Physics.

a.  the state of a system in which an abnormally large vibration is produced in response to an external stimulus, occurring when the frequency of the stimulus is the same, or nearly the same, as the natural vibration frequency of the system.

b.  the vibration produced in such a state.

And there you go,you just dumped your self in it lol.
Do you not understand what you read MH?.

System-->a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network; a complex whole.

a set of principles or procedures according to which something is done; an organized scheme or method.

You just stated exactly what i have said all along lol.

That did not work out to well for you--did it


Brad

[MileHigh]

You just stated exactly what i have said all along lol.

Yes we are in the Brad bonus round now, a "super roll."  I highlighted the second definition in an attempt to talk some sense into you and get you to wake up out of your stupor with respect to resonance.  The second definition shuts down all of your nonsense due to your lack of ability to conceptualize that a ringing bell is resonating.

resonance == the vibration produced in such a state == a ringing bell after it has been struck

[tinman]

Yes we are in the Brad bonus round now, a "super roll."  I highlighted the second definition in an attempt to talk some sense into you and get you to wake up out of your stupor with respect to resonance.  The second definition shuts down all of your nonsense due to your lack of ability to conceptualize that a ringing bell is resonating.

resonance == the vibration produced in such a state == a ringing bell after it has been struck

Lol-Nice try MH,but another fail lol

Quote:-->a.  the state of a system in which an abnormally large vibration is produced in response to an external stimulus, occurring when the frequency of the stimulus is the same, or nearly the same, as the natural vibration frequency of the system.

b.  the vibration produced in such a state.

You do realize that B is referring to the method of A--do you not?.lol.

Your a funny man MH.
But it's like i said--do you not understand what you are reading?.

http://www.regentsprep.org/regents/physics/phys04/bresonan/default.htm

Resonance
The increase in amplitude of oscillation of an electric or mechanical system exposed to a periodic external force whose frequency is equal to or some multiple of the natural frequency of the system.

Natural Frequency
The frequency an object will vibrate with after an external disturbance. These frequencies are usually discrete and depend only on the intrinsic physical quantities of the object.

So,as you can see MH,your bell will vibrate at it's natural frequency when hit once.
It will not resonate until it is exposed to an external force that has the same(or multiples of)frequency as the bells natural resonant frequency.

Nothing will resonate without the second part of the system.

I ask you once again--and we can find your answer all over this forum-->when dose a coil resonate,and when dose a coil just ring down?
When will a resonant circuit be in resonance,and when will it be just in oscillation?

You have answered this question many times before correctly,but now you wish to just change it all around ,and why?--just so as you can make your wine glass answers look correct
There is no end to your bullshit MH--it's bigger than minnies pile he posted not so long ago.
You two have to be related


Brad

[tinman]

Is in resonance with the air,, as demonstrated by the sound you hear,, and the stored energy within the amplitude of that  bell oscillation is reduced by said air interaction.

No Webby--that is dampened oscillation,not resonance.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damping

Brad

[tinman]

You simply don't realize that it's an idiotic question.  You are really on a roll.

What i have realized is that you cannot even draw a schematic of your ideal voltage source.

You will not even accept a challenge from me to see who can build the most efficient rotoverter.
You will not accept a challenge from me to see who can build the most efficient pulse motor.
You will not accept a challenge from me to see who can build the most efficient JT
You cannot even draw a circuit of your ideal voltage supply,but are happy to claim that you can answer your question correctly-->without even having the slightest idea as to how your ideal voltage supply is actually constructed to perform the required task,upon which the answer to your question is based.

This would have to be the most pathetic scientific method of defining an answer i have ever seen.
The only one that would get there ass booted out of your beloved scientific forums,is you,for idiotic rubbish like you have posted -both in this thread,and the JT thread.


I cant believe that you cannot provide a schematic for your ideal voltage source.
Your answer to your question has just become null and void,until such time as you can provide the complete circuit for analysis.


Brad