Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[lancaIV]

benfr, you are right, there is often misinterpretation !

pressure, force, work, power : the final is : work x time = power in Wh

Volt : tension         Ampere : current.        DC: Volt x Ampere = work

Volt-source + Ampere charge x time = power source
Ampere -source + Volt-charge x time = power source

So you mean you have a " power amplification concept":
based by a tension-source or current-source ?

How is the" factor : time" calculated if not 100% flow per second  but in pulsation ( time on/ off) ?


Sincerely
OCWL

p.s.: does the ambient makes part from your conversion concept device ? 

      do you analyze humidity, temperature, ambient/room pressure/ static  during tests ?

[benfr]

So you mean you have a " power amplification concept":
based by a tension-source or current-source ?


Sincerely
OCWL

Thanks...I have both. But I have only shown the VOLTAGE amplification , for free.
The AMPERAGE amplification, as described and exertable in Rick Friedrich's RICK, is the following :
one resonant tank LC in parallel.
to position energy watts consuming at the entry of the tank (1 W resistor before the tank, and following the frequency gen). Place also a capacitor in series between that resistor and the tank.
Placing such similar resistor inside the tank, between the capacitor and coil, will demonstrate AMPERAGE multiplication at the resonance point(s) with the following calculation.
This is done by using the measurement Power or Amperage in closed circuit = Voltage squared / resistance in OHM.
To measure, place two probes across each resistor.
Some resonant frequencies will demonstrate higher amplification than others. In the same circuit, several frequencies are resonant, and the Q is not the same for each of them.

[AlienGrey]

AG,

Gyula pointed (linked) in his above post to the specific post on page 20 you refer to.


All info on those 2 screenshots (1st one from the sim, 2th one from my real circuit/scope) are in that post.

Just picture the circuit drawn (see below), then for MY REAL CIRCUIT, picture the purple trace probe (CH3)
across V1 (FG and whole LRC), ground lead left (-), probe tip right (+).
I seem to have INVERTED the purple signal, so in real it should be flipped over (180°).

Then picture the blue trace probe (CH2) across C1 (series Cap), ground lead also left, probe tip right.


The reason for the voltages across the RLC (purple) and the C (blue) being 90° off is explained in a link i
presented a few post later to benfr (post # 295) where i wrote:


There it reads:

So (in resonance) compared to the "view" from across the whole RLC (purple), the signal across L and C are
resp. +90° and -90° (remember my purple trace is inverted) out of phase. 

Hope this clears it up.



Concerning this question:

I guess you mean my post #271 on page 19.

There i refer to Benfr his setup, see sim circuit (cap, coil, cap, coil, cap, coil in series) with parallel
across it a load (R1) and the FG (V1).

The square wave signal in both the SIM (green) and in my screenshot (blue and white) are from across the FG (V1).
The green (sim) and blue signals are when NOT in resonance (nice squares), the white one is what happens when
IN resonance (the resonance signal loads the FG in such a way that it forms these troughs.

Regards Itsu

Hi Itsu thanks for confirming that for me (i don't work  well if too many choices) I tried something like that when
Wesley mentioned adding a C  to an inductive coil transformer to obtain a 90 deg phase shift but got nowhere, I will retry to see if I can set the experiment
up for my self again and report back later, many thanks again.

[gyulasun]

Hi benfr,

You wrote:

However, coil matching at resonance is a matter that is not explored in the video, in an explicit way, for it has several dimensions : wavelength, capacitance, inductance, rate of change, disruptive discharge, and others. 

You mention "disruptive discharge".  I do not think there is "disruptive discharge" happening and I wrote this to a.king in my post #339, Page 23 of this thread. However, he has not returned with an answer yet.

Would you mind explaining how you think it happens in Rick's setup when the series LC (i.e. the TX) circuit is driven by the output of the gate driver IC? 

Gyula

[lancaIV]

benfr, thank you for the trial to make it clear ( me not ! )
Probably it will be a need to invest two hours of life for his view  and  description :
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ke4aqkrkh1o
So only after that I will ask you again for details. !


Happy disclosure wishing
OCWL