Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[forest]

Ok. Let put it straight. I believe it is closely related to this info from Ruslan Kulabuhov. Comments ?

[forest]

And the explanation why it may be related ....

[AlienGrey]

AG  instead of writing hieroglyphics and sideways insults perhaps you should allow those who are spending much time and effort here....the opportunity to continue...
insults and derogatory comments do nothing but drive people away...
but you already know that ?? 

Chet K

WITH OUT PREJUDICE
Chet why would i want to do that Chet when Rick is already doing a perfectly respectable job him self with out my help.

Perhaps if Rick could explain what his agenda actually is here in this thread with out him telling us indirectly that we are dangerously irresponsible unless we invest in his kit? or is that one of the conditions of accessing this thread ?
and with out him coming back saying i'm delusional 

and it wasn't me who described Rick as Jesus handing out free fishes and loaves 
Jesus didn't exist before 1603 by King James.Instead of Yahsha
Kind regards AG

[popolibero]

Hi Rick,


I think I get what Tesla was doing and explaining in the true wireless lecture. His magnifying transmitter (and receiver) is basically the same principle of a. in Fig.5. The earth is the same as the wire and the capacities of sender and receiver are acting like the expanding and contracting bag analogy of Fig.4., but the main transfer goes through the wire, or the earth. So, in a sense his wireless is a one wire system.
His method is superior to the hertzian method because he used a one wire connection (earth) and used resonance for maximising power sent, while the hertzian method only sends waves through the air which decay rapidly after short distance. 
Tesla was using/sending high freq. sinusoidal signals in this case, so no short impulses (except for the cap discharge into the primary of his magnifier but only to get more oscillations, not to send impulses), so I don't know why the association of the one method and short impulses, although impulses can of course trigger resonance just as well.
Tesla's one wire system has no return, The output of the SG in dvd7 are yes impulses but it has a return (to the main SG coil), this is why I see a limit in as how many series coils can be placed in the line, as opposed to an open wire. What John showed with added series coil and FWBR is an analogy to b. in Fig.5. but in John's case the coil is part of the wire to create a node, while the FWBR across it basically represents b. But still, the wire has a return.


Anyway, my goal is to charge as many batteries as possible from as little input as possible, and I wouldn't mind using the one wire technique.


thanks,
Mario

[rickfriedrich]

AG, I don't care what you say or if you insult me. I don't take this forum or any forum too seriously as I see you don't either. You appeared to be asking real questions but it is manifest that you are just looking for fault. Obviously you don't understand how over unity processes work. I pointed that out that you are trying to look at this all the wrong way. You can't have more of the same my friend. Obviously we have to do something fundamentally different if we are going to have a gain. Maybe you don't believe in over unity and are just here to disprove? I don't know. But what does poking at me do?

I have shared everything anyone needs to know to get all the answers and free energy they could want. I never said you need to have my kits. Did I not say the opposite. I just said if you are trying to evaluate my kit then you would need to have the parts. But I did tell you the parts and values already and said you could make your own. But my point was also that you cannot prove or disprove anything over the Forum. I know that takes the steam out of many people drive and mission here. It's a reality check and that may be offensive to people who spew out their assumptions left and right.

Again, I do not make any money on the Resonance Kit and it is purely for helping people out. I gave a kid a job to make coils so it was also helping him out. So this is a lie that you are pushing here that you claim I am saying "we are dangerously irresponsible unless we invest in his kit".

I didn't say you were delusional, but I didn't understand your words because you either are using a translator or don't care to type words properly.

I think it is manifest to everyone that I have made significant contributions to the free energy community over the years that earn me some respect here. At least for people to realize significant facts shared that I have also shared with supporting evidence you can verify. I have not only made claims, I have demonstrated them in public after mentioning in advance on this forum. But now I have pointed to you where others have made similar claims and have taught on the subject. I pointed out what all of you missed in DVD7. And this I have demonstrated in the real world. I don't expect anyone to believe that, but it shows I am not talking about something that I invented or just made up. It is something I have shown you goes back to Tesla and others, in the one wire teaching. You can ignore Tesla's words and technology and merely look at it as early Tesla in AC. But then everyone will be asking YOU AG, why are YOU HERE if you are not at least open to Tesla's processes that are obviously fundamentally different than the mainstream approach you are taking to understanding it?

I came on here because one customer went against my advice to him about promoting my kit on these forums. He did that on two forums and I just decided to simply draw attention to the point that you cannot prove anything or disprove anything regarding claims on forums. And that I observed people were trying to do that in regards to my kit when someone was not even using the kit parts and didn't even have any instructions! I got responses and so I responded to them. I have been a member of this forum for many years. I know Stefan and he has often promoted me over the years. I don't think I have been out of place in any of this. Some of you may want me gone and that is fine with me.

As for your point about the KJV and Jesus, I am fully aware of your argument. But if the word Jesus is wrong or bad then Yahsha is too. There were no English letters back 2000 years ago. I know it is a sensitive subject and I have friends that consider the subject really import. I will not disrespect your religious convictions in the matter. I have my reasons for using the words I use, and that is to try and promote clear communication rather than insist upon theological language that people do not understand.

Anyway, I don't have any agenda but to help people. What would I get out of everything I say. I have given you guys several things that can make you energy independent and also millions of dollars if you care to take the time to experiment yourself. I have helped you avoid the mistakes people make in this research based on my observations of thousands of people for 15 years all over the world in this work.

I guess for those who don't want to actually prove to themselves matters the only thing to do is poke at people for fun. 

                                             WITH OUT PREJUDICE
Chet why would i want to do that Chet when Rick is already doing a perfectly respectable job him self with out my help.

Perhaps if Rick could explain what his agenda actually is here in this thread with out him telling us indirectly that we are dangerously irresponsible unless we invest in his kit? or is that one of the conditions of accessing this thread ?
and with out him coming back saying i'm delusional 

and it wasn't me who described Rick as Jesus handing out free fishes and loves 
Jesus didn't exist before 1603 by King James.Instead of Yahsha
Kind regards AG