Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirmation of OU devices and claims

Started by tinman, November 10, 2017, 10:53:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Gear

I read this thread, but could not find scheme of Mr. Rick overunity circuit.
I also watched few of his videos but there he does not explain anything.

Can somebody point me or help me find that information of his OU device?

Thanks!

forest

All I'd like to say is I'm so sorry to see all those comments and responses. Thank you for W.Barbat articles , though I don't agree Hubbard used radium, because it was too expensive in his times.

Void

Quote from: forest on July 23, 2019, 03:09:23 PM
Thank you for W.Barbat articles , though I don't agree Hubbard used radium, because it was too expensive in his times.

Hi Forest.
From:
Seattle Post Intelligencer (February 26, 1928)
"In 1919 Hubbard represented the apparatus as being capable of extracting electrical energy directly from the air, but he admitted yesterday that this had been merely a subterfuge to protect his patent rights, and that, as a matter of fact, it had been a device for extracting electrical energy from radium, by means of a series of transformers which stepped up the rays. "

http://www.rexresearch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm


DavidWolff

Hubbard used  2.8Ghz that's faster than the electron rise time. a bit different to RF's device. If I can say that without upsetting anyone.

change the ecology around rivers. This is the power principle hidden by "authority" since 1919 that has made the cost of electricity what it is now, from expensive maintenance-hungry sources.

We hope we can set up a separate research on this principle when we finish the "Integratron".



Notes

According to G.D.Mutch, the dimensions in the table of Table 1 are taken from Hubbards actual 9-coil design:

Table 1

Hubbard Design     Outer     Inner     Total      Hubbards Frequencies
No. Coils               8           1            9            5.340 Hz = 2.8 Ghz/ (2^19)
Diameter mm         30         49                        10.681 Hz =€ 2.8 Ghz/ (2^18)
Height mm             146       146                       21.362 Hz = 2.8 Ghz/ (2^17)

"Hubbard used a multiply ratio of 5.75 formulated from his knowledge of the Golden Section. Example 49/30 = 1.6333. Hubbard stated that his nine(9) coil design above stepped up the output power compared to the input power by a ratio of 3:1... Hubbard stated he could use copper wire of different diameter/gauges to complete one totally wound coil.

Jimboot

Quote from: hartiberlin on July 22, 2019, 03:02:29 PM
I have put now a few more members on moderation as they have been attacking Rick.
This way I can better see, who posts what and if these are slander or defamation postings with notechnical analysis, I will not let it get through and will be deleted...

Regards, Stefan. ( Admin)


It's pretty disturbing to see some of the most respected members here moderated Stefan. I have been attacked many times and educated in the process here. As have many others, we misread or mismeasured and rely on forum like this to have the claims checked. Questioning someone who is making $ off selling devices while claiming OU without clearly demonstrating it is a community service. The ou.com brand is a promise that there will be rigorous debate. I'm afraid you are damaging it  by moderating some of the best minds you have at your service.