12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

I guess that's where my confusion come in. If these cylinders are mounted in fixed bearings, where will the 'jumping action' come from?

Must the cylinders be mounted in fixed bearings? Is it possible for the belt or chain mechanism to introduce some room for vibration or oscillation?

If such oscillations lead-out gravitational energy, can the Tsinghua University energy multiplier or Chas Campbell setup transfer such lead-out energy to the Generator (keeping the amplitude of such oscillations very low)?

[Pirate88179]

Must the cylinders be mounted in fixed bearings? Is it possible for the belt or chain mechanism to introduce some room for vibration or oscillation?

If such oscillations lead-out gravitational energy, can the Tsinghua University energy multiplier or Chas Campbell setup transfer such lead-out energy to the Generator (keeping the amplitude of such oscillations very low)?

Lawrence:

But the Chas Campbell device did not work when Mark D. went to evaluate it?  You are speaking as if it did indeed work.  If you have other information to this effect, please let us know.

Bill

[ltseung888]

This is what you try to accomplish:

NO.  I want to lead-out gravitational energy via the unbalanced cylinder.  I want to use standard, commercially available motors and generators.  The equation is

Eout = Ein + (Egravity - Eloss)

I want to get a large amount of Egravity via the fast rotating unbalanced cylinder.

[Pirate88179]

NO.  I want to lead-out gravitational energy via the unbalanced cylinder.  I want to use standard, commercially available motors and generators.  The equation is

Eout = Ein + (Egravity - Eloss)

I want to get a large amount of Egravity via the fast rotating unbalanced cylinder.

But Lawrence, the unbalanced cylinder will have the effect of needing more energy to rotate until the heavy point reaches 12:00, and then you can get "extra" energy as it rotates beyond this point.  However, you will not get more energy than it took to rotate the unbalanced cylinder to the 12:00 position...less due to friction.

How is this a way to "lead out" free energy due to gravity?

Bill

[ltseung888]

Lawrence:

But the Chas Campbell device did not work when Mark D. went to evaluate it?  You are speaking as if it did indeed work.  If you have other information to this effect, please let us know.

Bill

I do not think that Mark D or Chas Campbell understood the lead-out energy theory.  They might even tried to "do better engineering" and eliminated the "unbalancing".

A group in Hong Kong did exactly that.  I had to tell them to re-introduce bad engineering and do the unbalancing...  They did not talk to me again.

Tsinghua University did the right thing.  That might be the "state secret" that ended me in trouble 8 years ago.  Now many others "found" the secret by "tinkering".  There is no point in keeping the "state secret".

(Lee Cheung Kin told me repeatedly that what I am doing is kindergarden work compared with what has been developed in the Military Establishments in China. He never told me what was achieved there but he was right.)