The book is dedicated to self-propelled mechanical generating devices.

[rakarskiy]

In any case, in the simplest generator, at ideal values, the mechanical power on the shaft is twice the electrical power of the load.

That's where the discrepancy is so far! We decide further.

An interesting parallel between ampere power and two wires with current.  In both cases, the length is 1 m, and the current is 1 A.
The distance of a wire with a current of 1 A, when its induction is 1 Tl, is at a distance of 0.0000002 m (seventh decimal place). It is at this boundary of the field that the wires and the external flow interact with each other, and the external field cannot compress the wire field further.
If we consider two conductors with a length of 1 m, with a current of 1 A, then the distance of 0.0000002 m between the wires with magnetic induction circuits of 1 Tl, the force of attraction of the wires will be 9.86 Newtons (gravitational constant 9.81).
If we assume that the second conductor is an external magnetic field, then to calculate the power of the amplifier as a result of the attraction force of 1 N, the current in it will correspond to 0.1 A.
It can be concluded about the ratio of the current to the magnetic induction of the field, who is the helmsman, in the condition of the "Ampere Force".

[bistander]

Just a basic calculation. In the statement of the constant: 1 Tesla = 1 Newton / 1 Ampere * 1 meter, the dimensionality of the distance of the field boundary of the wire for equilibrium with the external field is equal to the minimum, in fact, the surface of the conductor.   I calculated both conditions. In reality, based on the experiments conducted, there was not a single case that the distance was equivalent to the surface of the conductor.

Mr. Rakarskiy,
I mentioned previously you misapply Ampere's Force Law. Now you use a units definition as a method to calculate a variable. It is not an equation intended for such use.
bi

(edit) excuse me please. I have lost the URL where I copied the graphic used. Similar can be easily found by search for "physics units of tesla".

[rakarskiy]

Mr. Rakarskiy,
I mentioned previously you misapply Ampere's Force Law. Now you use a units definition as a method to calculate a variable. It is not an equation intended for such use.
bi

(edit) excuse me please. I have lost the URL where I copied the graphic used. Similar can be easily found by search for "physics units of tesla".

Listen, "the expert who failed the test", what Tesla and Gauss are ( probably heard about such a dimensionality of the magnetic field), I have charmingly known since the 80s of the last century.   I can count very well, even better than many.

Tesla as a unit of measurement:
Tesla is a unit of measurement of magnetic flux density, magnetic field strength and induction in the International System of Units (SI), named after the inventor Nikola Tesla.

Tesla as a unit of measurement has the Russian designation - Tлl and the international designation - T.

1 tesla is equal to the induction of such a homogeneous magnetic field in which a force of 1 newton acts on 1 meter of the length of a straight conductor perpendicular to the magnetic induction vector with a current of 1 ampere. In other words, one Tesla is equal to the field strength acting on a conductor with a force of one newton per meter of conductor at a current strength for each ampere of current.

Similarly, one Tesla represents a magnetic flux density of one weber per square meter of area.

T = kg / (c² · A) = N / (A · m) = Wb / m².

1 T = 1 kg / (1 s² · 1 A) = 1 N / (1 A · 1 m) = 1 Wb / 1 m².

Tesla was introduced into the International System of Units by the decision of the XI General Conference on Weights and Measures in 1960, simultaneously with the adoption of the SI system as a whole. In accordance with the SI rules concerning derived units named after scientists, the name of the Tesla unit is written with a lowercase letter, and its designation is capitalized (Tl). This spelling of the designation is also preserved in the designations of derived units formed using Tesla.

I suggest you do your calculation! If you can't, then it's better to just be a spectator. Otherwise, the employer is uneven, read your conclusions

[bistander]

Rather cumbersome isn't it? And in the end will prove nothing due to circular reasoning. Why not just build your toy simplest generator and test it? 1700% efficiency published in your book. And that wasn't worth building the simplest generator and a test.
bi

[Floor]

@ rakarskiy

Build and test your principle in a simple experiment.


floor