Perpetual motion based V track or V gate 3

[gyulasun]

Hi Turbo,

Well, "without iron core": this I understood.  What needs further understanding is how the stored kinetic energy can be 'profitable' versus the pulsed input energy to the coil?  I know you did not state anything 'profitable' but Julio's setup has the same chance, without any further input energy once it has started its spinning by a small input.

[Turbo]

Hello there is no 'profitable' in those permanent magnet setups, i am sorry to read that you still believe in that.
If you light up a light bulb and show it to a primordial human they will think that you are a God.
Give them the light bulb, and they will spend the rest of their live trying to make it glow.
They do not know that you had a battery that supplied the necessary energy to heat up the filament.
The same is true for magnets.

In the case of magnetic fields, and this is important, the energy gain you and all others are so very interested in, is very small.
I can not say you all, but certainly most of the people are working on the wrong end of the spectrum.
What i mean by that it that most people are using the strongest magnets they can get their hands on combined with iron cored coils, with tremendous sticky spots, which completely nullify that feeble amount of the energy you so badly try to extract.
Consider it a tiny drop on a full bucket, it needs to be able to run freely, any resistance it encounters will make it vanish.

This means air cores and speed, and no sticky spots, any iron in it's vicinity will make it stop.

I hope you realize that the air core pulse width decreases with speed.
While induction increases with speed.
Of course there will be resistance when you try to load it so the loading mechanism has to have a specific timing degree as well, let's just say balanced loading..
But that's of no importance when you just leave that part out to start with.

I can even go further and say that you can swap the magnets for equally sized pieces of iron as long as you use the exact same construction of the gate.
That means you can omit the magnets entirely, does that answer your question about 'profitable' ?
Of course in that case it would become harder to load it, induction wise, and so it would be hard to create a feedback loop that makes the field of the aircore coil stronger on every cycle...
 
But that illustrates nicely that it's not really about those magnets, but focus more on (elektro)magnetic attraction.
 

[gyulasun]

Hi Turbo,

On the word "profitable" I meant any extra energy available from your proposed setup beyond the input neccessary for a continuous operation.  If the extra energy is just enough for sustaining a continuous operation of the rotor,  that is already a gain in itself, a self-running situation. 

From your yesterday posts I see your proposed setup also needs an initial input for speeding the rotor up, then it would remain self sustaining and the start-up input could be removed.  Fine.
My problem with this is that  (and no offense intended)  what you say sounds like "Baro Münchausen lifting himself up by his own hair" while the setup from Julio with the weight and spring does not sound like that for me.
Because then the setup would need to produce a little bit more energy than what would be needed to defeat air drag, coil loss, rectifier loss, uchip feed etc, just from the rotor's own kinetic energy (after the speed-up).

I understand that an increasing rotor speed involves a decreasing air core pulse and an increasing induction. I also understand what you mean by "the loading mechanism has to have a specific timing degree".

Well, it is very strange for me when you say the magnets can be swapped by equally sized iron pieces in the exact same construction of the gate...  In this case how can you maintain the initial input energy that was needed for speeding up the rotor ?
I know you did not say energy is created but how would you make the air cored coil's field stronger on every cycle with having iron pieces instead of the rotor magnets? 
Any further info you would kindly share would be appreciated. (I will not run to a patent office... do not care about such).

Thanks,  Gyula

[Turbo]

No the iron pieces can not be used to create the feedback loop.
I think you mis read that part.

If you want a simple demonstration about that free movement, take a piece of cloth wire and suspend some strong neodymium magnet in the air free to move.
You will see it will align itself to the earth's magnetic field.
Give it a spin and see what happens.
You will feel it cutting the lines of flux, you will see a point of resistance, and when you flip it over that, a point of release.
Imagine canceling out the point where it finds that most resistance by a small pulse on the air core.
I have had 'self spinners' by using cube magnets they spin until the resistance of the wound up cotton wire becomes too much.

It's not hard to try this im sure most of you guy's have a few magnets and some cotton wire laying around.

[gyulasun]

Hi Turbo,

Well, I did not write the iron pieces can be used to create the feedback loop, rather I asked two questions in connection with your mention of replacing the permanent magnets with iron pieces.

Gyula