Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


The two capacitor paradox debate

Started by onepower, September 02, 2020, 01:19:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

v8karlo

I can only speculate about root of problem.


Charge density depends on charge field which repel each other.


Charge field strength relates to the inverse square law, which is exponential.
When this rule is translated via equations to the power,
it ends that power follow same rule and is exponential.


Just a guess. Never dived into math of power equations to try to find cause.


But I believe that cause is in equations.


onepower

v8karlo
QuoteDoubling or halfing voltage is done in linear fashion.
Power is calculated in exponential manner.
When our mind tries to connect dots from linear to exponential,
paradox occur, because it is unlogical for us.
Does that means that energy is 4 times smaller with halfing voltage ?
(not power but energy in cap)

Exactly, while the voltage may be 1/2 the energy changes at a different rate which is exponential based on the charge density not the voltage following the inverse square law. More charges in a given area require more force to move them against the force of repulsion/attraction based on the number of charges already present. So energy is never 1+1=2 but 1+1=3, 2+2=9 and so on while the voltage is linear.

Which ultimately begs the question of how we could use this to our advantage given energy is everywhere in everything.

Regards

v8karlo

P = U * I


Power is product.


Where do you see inverse square law in this simple equation.


Power should not follow inverse square law.
Inverse square law is reserved for strength of field of charges and should not be integrated into power calculations.


Somebody mixed apples and oranges and as result expect only apples.
Which can not be.


Otherwise, just keep adding voltage in cap and soon you will have so much power that you can power the city from capacitor.


Is it like that in reality?


Lunkster

Quote from: v8karlo on September 02, 2020, 02:40:35 PM
Doubling or halfing voltage is done in linear fashion.


Power is calculated in exponential manner.


When our mind tries to connect dots from linear to exponential,
paradox occur, because it is unlogical for us.


Does that means that energy is 4 times smaller with halfing voltage ?
(not power but energy in cap)


So, you see,
everything is correct and
nothing is correct.


Glich in system.

Can this problem be simulated by another method like the one in the attached drawing?

kajunbee

Are you looking for another analogy for capacitors. If so you could replace the liquid  with a compressed gas.