Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

Started by WhatIsIt, September 06, 2020, 10:09:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 28 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

Quote from: EMJunkie on September 24, 2020, 01:55:39 AM


P.S: IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE THE SCOPE PROGRAMED INCORRECTLY! We have done DC Tests and Calibrated the Scope! There is ONLY A x B, to get the Right Measurements! Picowatt STOP Misleading People Man!


EMJ,

How does performing scope calibrations under DC conditions relate to measuring complex AC waveforms with reactive current flowing?

PW

picowatt

Quote from: EMJunkie on September 24, 2020, 03:00:12 AM

False Claim, there is no reactive Power, its all pure power, Voltage and Current are in phase and Power Factor is at or very close to: 1.0

False claim!

Now, GO AWAY Picowatt, it is clear you have no intention to research this Properly!

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these Dire Times,
   Chris Sykes

I do not understand how you can believe there is no reactive current flowing in a circuit having both inductive and capacitive reactance.

I began posting here again when you said you would quit deleting posts, but I see that did not last long. 

PW

lancaIV

Was it not written CaptainLoz worked with " 35% or less" duty factor/cycle !?

17,8 Watt x 0,35 ~ 6,23 Watts

17,8 Watt x 0,3   ~  5,34 Watts
                                  5,6 Watts 2 rated lamps Wattage

ramset

The consequences for humanity and our planet are enormous ...with holding life saving tech for no good reason other thanto call people "LIARS or Stupid or Dumb or "retards... Moron's etc"[Chris words here }when they are unable to replicate...makes people think the worst and frustrated !!

I am extremely grateful Captainloz and Atti2 are sharing and trying to sincerely verify their work!
In science when such a claim of extraordinary value to humanity is made...you should run towards scrutinyand beg investigation..

there is a reason nobody has  been able to loop this work independant of a supply...we as a community need to find and separate the gain mechanism..and simple questions to verify output should never be met with attacks.
  Taking the temperature of a bulb for comparison...or benchmark ?
this is such a simple quick test ?



After all we are not discussing cooking or baking recipes ...here the tech will save lives and would have saved many
lives this last decade if shared publicly in a document![is that a crime ? ask a child over 5 years old ""Should I play hide and seek with Humanity for 10 years or save lives ??

this is an open source venue ...not a secret handshake club where the less fortunate must beg for Crumbs ...[for ten years]
and when those who know for years how to measure are vilified ?

PLEASE SHARE and help more to understand...this EGO war is costing lives as we type.
there are 85000 members here [and counting.... who could save millions of lives and many species and forests etc etc.

  Good Stefan shows his support for Chris at this forum[once again]
now let Chris reciprocate and show some anomaly ...he did write he would a few days ago [but ??
We don't need math...we need food and clean water and power ....enuff Crumb dropping and beggingPlease tell us what the replicators who failed here are doing wrong [100's] ?instead of calling them LIARS ??

Lanca a thermometer or a light meter... same bulb... same results ...input power will give a temperature or benchmark !
IMO we now need a separate thread dedicated to "running towards scrutiny"
THE STAKES ARE TOO HIGH HERE....Too many are not joining in because of all this fighting and game playing [funny pics and
posts of starving children [as Jokes ?]

lives depend on this.... it is not a game.
when did this indifference for humanities suffering become OK ??
here there is a mission statement to the contrary

PLEASE OPEN SOURCE
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

partzman

CaptainLoz,

In reference to your video #5 seen here-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk9uSOdj-hE

Before the video even starts, the first frame shows that you have the secondary resonating cap in parallel with the load or the lamps and you have the sense resistor in series with this combination.  Herein lies the source of your "OU" as you are including the reactive current through the capacitance in your overall power output calculation.  This is a common error that is easy to make.

Simply rewire the secondary circuit so that the sense resistor is in series only with the lamp load and then the capacitor would then be in parallel with that series network.  I think you will find that your OU goes away under these conditions.

Regards,
Pm