The MAD MAX e-car

[lancaIV]

Solar and wind tech are intermittent. 


They are most efficient as point of use and time of production use.


And the bridge to "permanent or periodic (on demand) artificial photo(n)=light-voltaic ,later thermo(Phonon)-photo(n)-voltaic,


and artificial wind turbine converter .




Artificial photovoltaic converter array


http://www.rexresearch.com/imris/imris.htm

At higher pressures, the device becomes Over Unity.( from physical values : this statement : wrong !)


  For instance, with a Xenon filled tube at 5,000 torr in a series circuit with 100  40 Watt fluoresent lamps (with a single wire going to each end of each lamp),
the optical generator pulls 332 Watts, with each lamp pulling 9 tenths Watt (at 5 Volts) for 3,200 lumens output (8.8 Watts) per tube - giving a total for the circuit of 880 Watts output for 442 Watts input.

and


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=9&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19900201&CC=DE&NR=3817730A1&KC=A1


instead End 80´ 5,25% conversion photovoltaic cells experimenting with 10-15-20,later 45% and more conversion efficiency


                                                                     Imris-Koehler tubes


with 15% efficiency cells : up to 100 tubes x 200 W output = 20 000 W per hour : for 442 Watts input. 


btw: by old unefficient 40 Watt fluorescent lamps technology ,Dr.Pavel Imris application priority date 7-23-1974




                                                                                     #36


  2400 Wh electric consume per day / 24 h      = 100 W net per hour electricity generation and storage = 2400 VAh battery


                                                              1x 200 Watt output tube is enough


I learned by my father (R.I.P.),I.N.S.E.A.D.-M.B.A. level ,also "No,Mr.d´Estaing (I.N.S.E.A.D. Decan G./O.d´E.),it is wrong !" courage
                                                                                      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Val%C3%A9ry_Giscard_d%27Estaing
                                                                                      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivier_Giscard_d%27Estaing
                                                                                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INSEAD

and as https://www.investopedia.com/articles/professionals/011416/controller-job-description-average-salary.asp working


to work out in Physics "Laplace operator" and " The controller oversees the accounting operations of a machine".




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel_Kron    and  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann applying


                                                 Kybernetik-Modulation


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybernetics   


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kybernetik




artificial wind converter :


https://www.patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=9318


dis-vantage : the load side does not controle the source side !


permanent/periodic generation possible , with blade rpm controlling and by this generator output controle ,but :


direct couple only in on/off manner ( f.e. heater in cold time /cooler in summer )


the same -for free use/universal- non-operational dis-vantage here ,artificial light conversion:


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=paul+heinrich+marzahn&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search


the output does not controle the source and also not the consumer side


the artificial solar and wind converter to see and use as battery charger and/or resistive loads charger




https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.udo-leuschner.de/basiswissen/SB124-05.htm  related #37

[Floor]

So this

"  For instance, with a Xenon filled tube at 5,000 torr in a series circuit with 100  40 Watt fluoresent lamps (with a single wire going to each end of each lamp),

the optical generator pulls 332 Watts, with each lamp pulling 9 tenths Watt (at 5 Volts) for 3,200 lumens output (8.8 Watts) per tube - giving a total for the circuit of 880 Watts output for 442 Watts input."

If valid...
combined 100 % efficiently, with a 51% efficient solar electric array,
would be unity ?
... ... ... ... ... ... ...
332 watts + (0.9 watts per lamp x 100) = 332 +90 = 422 watts input

3200 lumens = ? watts
? amount of radiant power = ? watts
I'm not sure what the conversion ratio is...

[lancaIV]

So this

"  For instance, with a Xenon filled tube at 5,000 torr in a series circuit with 100  40 Watt fluoresent lamps (with a single wire going to each end of each lamp),

the optical generator pulls 332 Watts, with each lamp pulling 9 tenths Watt (at 5 Volts) for 3,200 lumens output (8.8 Watts) per tube - giving a total for the circuit of 880 Watts output for 442 Watts input."

If valid...
combined 100 % efficiently, with a 51% efficient solar electric array,
would be unity ?
... ... ... ... ... ... ...
332 watts + (0.9 watts per lamp x 100) = 332 +90 = 422 watts input

3200 lumens = ? watts
? amount of radiant power = ? watts
I'm not sure what the conversion ratio is...

https://overunity.com/16681/24365-solar-cell-output-theory-and-experiments/105/


https://petapixel.com/2016/06/02/primer-inverse-square-law-light/


the lumen per Watt formula is defined by 1 metre distance !

https://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2016/06/lightfalloffsquare.jpg  1 metre to 10 cm distance ?


when by 1    metre distance   : (1/1)v2 x 38 lumen  =      38 lumen/Watt/sqm area x 35W  =     1330 lumen/sqm


             0,1 metre  distance  : (1/0,1)v2 x 38 lumen = 3800 lumen/Watt/sqm area x 35 W = 133 000 lumen/sqm

the importance : natural earth daylight intensity reached !


                        133 000 lumen   /   93 lm/W =       1430 W  daylight per hour and sqm


                         3200 lumens = ? watts    per tube ( and how -by which distance- measured ? )

                                                                    by 1mtr. distance :           
   
                        3200 lumen / (93 lm/W) =  34,4 Watt by (442 W/100 tubes) 4,42 W each input
                         

                         3200 lumen / 1330 lumen fluorescent lamp  = 2,4 x 35 rated Watt = 84 rated Watt per tube !




now for right balancing : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum  and specific solar/thermic cell nm conversion optimum

[Floor]

power output in the form of visable light energy, which is equivalent to 84 watts of electric power
per flouescent tube.

100 tubes

8400 watts light output power.

Ok thanks for the links etcetera.
... ... ... ... ...
also for me to look into...
  spectrum of light  emission by tubes
    and
  spectrum of light absorption by "receiver / method"
... ... ... ... ...
         thanks
I will explore it further.
     regards
         floor

[lancaIV]

3200 lumen output


a. conventional


b. with Dr. Imris generator


a. 3200 lumen permanent


b.  to periodic 3200 lumen peak ,stroboscope like ?

3200 lumen / (93 lm/W) =  34,4 Watt by (442 W/100 tubes) 4,42 W each input

8/1

https://patents.google.com/patent/US5130608A/en


Using Ohm's Law, these conditions would produce 100 watts of peak power.
Using Equation I, the average power in the Example 1 can thus be calculated, i.e., about 4 watts.


Assuming that the power dissipated in the module itself is approximately 8 watts, the total average energy consumed is the sum of energy expenditure due to load and energy dissipated in the working module, namely a grand total of about 12 watts.


100 W /12 W = near 8/1

As is well-known in the lighting art, fluorescent light is perceived continuous at 60 cycles AC per second,


which is above the time-resolving ability of the eye or critical fusion frequency (CFF)




But :
the Koehler-artificial light converter works without "power saving modules" or opto-electric generator

and the photo-voltaic conversion efficiency is now in the 45% range


from original 70W/35 W lamp by 5,25% cell efficiency ,the ratio transforms by 15% to 200 W/35W and by 45% efficiency to 600 W/35 W


the original 35 W lamps now by same output in the 20-25 W range commercial available


Imris and Zahardis are optional improvements !


for stationary installation :


Koehler 1 battery to lamp to solar cell


to         2 cell output to lamp to solar cell


to         3  ..........


to         .....         


Watt,KW,MW cascade by lamp inrush Voltage ( often overseen !) and inrush Amperage attention and handling !

The 35 Watt lamp emitts 1330 lumen,by 1330 lumen/(93 lumen/W) this equates 14,3 Watt output
and by 5,25% radiation conversion efficiency 14,3 W x 0,0525 = 0,75 W electric solar cell output !     

     By conventional 1 metre distance calculation !
With 10 cm distance : 133 000 lumen/(93 lm/W) = 1430 Watts
With lower distance there is also a known effect in work : npn /pnp layer cells recombination time

      distance/time/speed(velocity) relationship,beside photons flow concentration


Learning to work with numbers :

when the FRG MEMS-TAR converts with 45% efficiency by natural daylight about 1330 W/sqm ( theoretical solarconstant) a 600 Watt AC output

the same MEMS- TAR has 10 W/sqcm potential ,converter cooled,=

                                     100 000 Watts per sqm ( 1 sqm = 10 000 sqcm)

100 000 Watts peak/ 600 W natural unconcentrated daylight output = 166/1

Not enough ? : Reversible Thermoelectric Converter,Joseph Yater               

                         practical 10v7 or 10 000 000 Watt/sqm output  or 1 KW per sqcm
                         theoretical 10v12

When we remember Alvin Marks his 1984 'lumilight'- light converter 10 US$ per sqm production price ,compare the Yater-converter in the same production process level,but with 2021 100 US$/sqm production costs :

10 000 US$cents/ 100 000 Wp(per sqm) = 0,1 US$cent/Wp               
                              /1 000 000 Wp                   = 0,01 US$cent/Wp
This was the quentron/quenco 1-0,1 US$¢/Wp target and is the Nano-Boxx double layer production concept,40US$/KW production costs anymore to seen as " cheap" !

Last point : fluorescent lamp 35 rated Watt with 38 lm/W
                                                         Luminosity,Helligkeit,S(c)h(e)in(e)     bright

when by  1 mtr distance                   1330 lumen per sqm    / ( 93 lm/W)

                0,1 mtr distance           133 000 lumen per sqm    / ( 93 lm/W)   but compressed/concentrated 1/100 sqm

                0,01 mtr distance    13 300 000 lumen per sqm   / ( 93 lm/W)     but compressed/concentrated 1/10 000 sqm
                     1 cm

                0,001 mtr distance 
                        1 mm

        or near ' DISTANCE ZERO '

       fluorescent lamps with ' sputted ' thermionic dots layer   surface cover           

       Lamp : when r = 2 cm then  circumference 2x pi x r  = 12,56 cm x 100 cm lamp length = 1256 sqcm

      1 sqm = 10 000 sqcm / 1256 sqcm =~ 1/8 sqm thermionic cell



https://web.archive.org/web/20120903004151/http://whatistemperature.com/

Temperature or OE Frequency is measured in gigacycles/sec

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=12&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19880119&CC=US&NR=4720642A&KC=A

In the macro regime, conventional electrical theory applies with its concepts of resistance, resistive loss, capacitance.


In the quantum regime an energy quantum is totally absorbed by an electron, producing an energetic electron which travels within its potential well, until it penetrates the tunnel junction.


Upon passing through the junction, the electron gives its energy to the electric field, becoming a thermal electron at a greater potential energy.
Reverse current through the junction is constant, being limited by the junction structure and electric voltage. The forward current in the quantum regime is limited only by the input rate of energy quanta.
Hence the forward/reverse current ratio of the Femto Diode may be very large.

The laws of physics which apply to large-scale electrical circuits in the macro regime are different from the quantum electrodynamic laws of physics in the quantum regime.
Because of the small current and time intervals concerned, individual electrons are utilized one at a time.
In a Femto Diode, a single electron approaches the barrier travelling over submicron distances with an energy .xi.=h.nu.=Ve.
Consequently, no charge cloud forms at the insulating barrier, and there is therefore no capacitance effect.
The time constant equation is therefore not applicable to the submicron diode of the invention.

The energetic electron in this case is a sole electron in a dipole antenna operating in the quantum regime. It is subject to quantum regime laws, which are different from the macro-regime RLC laws conventionally applied to antennae.
Since RLC circuit theory does not apply in the quantum regime, the properties of the well-step quantum analysis discussed in connection with FIGS. 3 and 4 applies. The dipole antenna length b is adjusted to a 1/4 cycle of the light frequency .lambda. so that b=.lambda./4n.



https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19941018&CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A


Up to 10 MW (or 10v7 W)/sqm






M.A.S.E.R. like


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19890524&CC=DD&NR=268331A5&KC=A5


up to 10v14 Watt/sqcm