Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The MAD MAX e-car

Started by lancaIV, July 23, 2021, 06:56:42 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

lancaIV

Danke, Neo-Messerschmitt-team fuer die  " The 1.4 kWh battery should allow a maximum range of at least 80 kilometers ! " performance .


1400 Wh / 0,7 brake energy recuperation = 2000 Wh for 80 Km and /0,8 = 2500 Wh consume per 100 Km


                                        Garfield Wood supercar and Arzen e-Egg equivalence !


                       End 80´"green movement" Twingo to 3 Lt./100 Km consume tuning !


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twingo_Smile%23:~:text%3DDer%2520Twingo%2520SmILE%2520ist%2520ein,Intelligent.

Greenpeace concluded from the study that with the concept used,
it was relatively easy to achieve a reduction in fuel consumption of 50% for all series-produced vehicles at the time.


Before :                           https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_VESTA_2



At first :                   2500 Wh with conventional EMF cw or ccw becomes in a capacitive circuit/cycle

                                                         by BEMF-ccw and EMF-cw cycle (or reziproke)

                                  " 250 Wh " x 400 Gr.CO2/KWh german Electricity-sources-mix

                                                        = 100 Gr. CO2 per 100 Km emission



                                                                1 Gr. CO2 per kilometre

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.euractiv.de/section/energie-und-umwelt/interview/experte-co2-preis-in-der-eu-duerfte-sich-bis-2030-auf-90-euro-erhoehen/

                                       90 Euros per ton CO2 emission = per 1 000 Kg CO2 emission or per 1 000 000 Gr. CO2 emission

90 Euros = 9000 Euro-Cents / 1 000 000 Gr. = 0,009 Cent per Km CO2 tributation/certificate costs or :

                                                                   1 cent per 111 Km range

                                                                                    ;D  furchtbar ! furious !




https://www.vda.de/de/themen/umwelt-und-klima/co2-regulierung-bei-pkw-und-leichten-nfz/co2-regulierung-bei-pkw-und-leichten-nutzfahrzeugen.html


Regulation by 2020
From 2021, new cars in the EU will only be allowed to emit an average of 95 grams of CO2, vans 147 grams.
The permitted CO2 emissions for both passenger cars and light commercial vehicles are regulated by the EU.


This means: The average emissions of a manufacturer's newly registered vehicles must not exceed a legally fixed limit value in grams of CO2 per kilometer driven.


After initially setting a target of 130 grams of CO2 for cars in 2015, the target value for 2021 was tightened to 95 grams.
Similarly, the average emissions of light commercial vehicles (vans up to 3.5 tons) must not exceed 175 grams in 2014 and 147 grams from 2020.






https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_VESTA_2 ICE 20 kW (27 ch = hp) peak (same Loremo engine numbers !) to rated/nominal electric motor KW


                                                                                to RENAULT VESTA 3 ECO-ELECTRIC ,


                                                     consume target : < 1 KWh electricity per 100 Km less brake energy recuperation


                                 It is all existent, experimented and analyzed,anymore the need for re-/search :
                   
                                 existent modells/prototypes replication by improved 2021 technical standart

Beside capacitive winding motor , the known Haeusler Zsolt and Michel Porquer papers !

What I term as MAD/e MAX car is as Vision also known as "Hypercar",by Amory Lovins,Rocky Mountains Institute








From concepts like https://www.makethefuture.shell/en-gb/shell-eco-marathon      to          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmfcNBkx_1I Ford Probe V


to https://autotrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/lovins-hypercar-concept.jpg    to        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLASs0ueF7I


                                                                                                                                       https://web.archive.org/web/20160711005606/http://www.rqriley.com/xr3.htm

                                                                                                                                       https://www.designboom.com/cars/xr3-plug-in-hybrid/


                                 and        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhCLloR6fPA


      peak  I(nternal) C(ombustion) E(ngine with/-out Turbo-compressor) KW to correct = rated/nominal continous electric motor KW conversion

lancaIV

Now to ULTIMA RATIO :


e-Egg for 2000 Euros,circa 100 Kg vehicle total weight realization possibility by comparison


https://german.alibaba.com/product-detail/2020-new-model-e-trike-manila-for-sale-62221349480.html?spm=a2700.7724857.normal_offer.d_title.4ff938acb2Sy61450 US$/95 Kg


https://german.alibaba.com/product-detail/battery-operated-electric-cargo-tricycle-with-heavy-loading-500kg-van-tricycle-for-delivery-e-trikes-62149442633.html?spm=a2700.7724857.normal_offer.d_title.6e6c38ac5HBavt750 US$/370 Kg


https://german.alibaba.com/product-detail/exuberant-e-trike-for-indian-people-with-great-performance-1600146132970.html?spm=a2700.7724857.normal_offer.d_title.6e6c38ac5HBavt1750 US$/350 Kg


https://german.alibaba.com/product-detail/mobility-closed-m1-trike-m-1-e-car-electricscooters-new-electric-tricycle-1600118965036.html?spm=a2700.7724857.normal_offer.d_title.6e6c38ac5HBavt1450 US$/155 Kg


5-10 US$/Kg etrike means by 100 Kg weight E-Egg by chinese production condition a selling price between 500-1000 US$ each


                   this are all not "cars,by industrial standarts and normation " ! LIGHT MOTORCYCLE (AMI,Rocks et cetera class !)


                             I would assume similar "safety concerns" like here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REVAi  or C5 Sinclair




We take for reference,car class, the RENAULT KWID and DACIA Duster ( physical both electric = DACIA SPRING ) :


                             average KWID curb weight ( 678 Kg + 775 Kg) /2 = 727 Kg car weight


https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_Kwid#:~:text=Der%20Renault%20Kwid%20ist%20ein,bis%20353.000%20Rupien)%20verkauft%20wird.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_Kwid


                              starting price 3500 Euros in India,IC engine version : 3500 Euros / 727 Kg weight = 4,8 Euros / Kg car base price


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.adac.de/rund-ums-fahrzeug/autokatalog/marken-modelle/dacia/dacia-duster/


                             starting price 11990 Euros,IC engine version : 11 990 Euros /1090 Kg = 11 Euros / Kg car base price




                            KWID + DUSTER AVERAGE = ( 4,8 Euros + 11 Euros ) / 2 = 7,9 Euros /Kg


https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_VESTA_2   :     473 kg x 7,9 Euros =



                                                                        +- 3750 Euros car basic price ,

                                                                                    before incentives

                                                        VESTA 2 to VESTA 3 electric,conversion costs ?!


Rural user/ consumer priorities : 0-50 Km/h : sec ?         0-75 Km/h : sec ?         0-100 Km/h : sec ? 

                                   Sub-/Urban user/consumer ,by given legal street speed max. velocity !?


VESTA 2 :  Michel Porquer 4x 500 W electric transmission/ Haeusler Zsolt 1500 Watt/220 Volt power level !

                  2000 Wh/100 Km ,modified 1000 Wh/100 Km ( step 1 = MOD light ;)  , step II 500 Wh per 100 Km )

                                      long range potential or unlimited range potential wished ?

                                                 by brake energy recuperation ( et cet. 8)  )




            Let us be "splendid spending " and calculate high with 7500 Euros a new  "DUSTER SPRING" class car :


                                                                      less incentive


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.carwow.de/ratgeber/elektroauto/foerderungen-fuer-e-autos-2020-welche-zuschuesse-gibt-es%23gref


                          Innovation bonus (environmental bonus) for electric and hybrid cars : Renault,up to 9000 Euros,per car
                                       
                                       a new electric "compact class car " for 2500 Euros , net ?




                                                         city-share community argument,is it not ?




Citroen Ami or Opel Rocks are not cars, "electric scooter class" = does not get electric car or Hybrids incentives !


                    By their lease-/rent plan it will be possible to rent a " 4-wheel e-scooter " for 20 Euros per month !


                                 By VESTA 3 electric calculation plan,with incentives ,below 20 Euros per month !




                           Safety ,relatively, warranted ,4-5 seater :    " NewAge FAMILY "- car and costs issue !?




                                                Capacity time-shared :     /2       /4      /6 
 

                                                first = main owned car,second car,third car !?


                                                 10 - 5 - 2,5 Euros per month (user,family) budget part




                                                as cheap as public transport,partial now offered -por gratia -








                         We are individuals, also in family households,and like and wish our private (legal) freedom !


                         There is not and will be never an universal solution : local and time and object and priorities dependent !










                         I am liberal working,included social capitalism and communism (not partidary),but economical communism rules :


                                   Walras/Paretto/v.Weizsaecker social-economics with the temporary final target : Enthrophy = Egalité




                                                        controlled costs by controlled financement




                                                        cash = moeda,Muenze,Coin 1/1


                                                        or credit = Nota,Wechsel,bond,obligation ( 1/8 - 1/10 macro-economic internal lever observation !)




https://www.robinwood.de/   and  https://www.greenpeace.de/  and  https://fridaysforfuture.de/  and  https://rmi.org/


                                                                             can  co-work


                                                                                 to realize

                                                   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03Rt0dSHIXA

                                                  the 2500 Euros,net, 120 Km/h peak, 1 Gr. CO2 per Km


                                                  or  "Rent-Abonnements"  like https://www.share-now.com/




                   But to realize the 1000 Euros(before incentives) Arzen E-Egg electric trike also ,not to forget !


                   As 3rd : e-Loremo ?! In E.U. new for before incentives 5 000 Euros, 1 250 Euros net,after incentives ?





                                                                  TATA FOUNDATION ?


                                              https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacKenzie_Scott participation ?

                                                 ? Ali Baba ? Foundation participation ?
                                                             
               https://www.alizila.com/jack-ma-foundation-and-alibaba-foundation-donate-to-world-health-organization/


                                                                but not "-express",no(t) hurry !  ::)




btw : TATA MOTORs   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata_Motors                     production capacity


        and GAC unused capacity


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://observador.pt/2021/09/10/china-stellantis-fecha-fabrica-que-detinha-a-meias-com-a-gac/




Ford Ka+  https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/2017_Ford_KA%2B_Zetec_1.2_%281%29.jpg/250px-2017_Ford_KA%2B_Zetec_1.2_%281%29.jpg         


    and Lovins Hypercar style comparison :


https://autotrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/lovins-hypercar-concept.jpg




less known design concepts,f.e. https://www.carstyling.ru/resources/concept/1994_Citroen_Xanae_Concept_mockups.jpg


https://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2014-Volkswagen-XL1-Hybrid1.jpg


and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X58oEF1dBqg






As Conceptionalist I take the Fend/Messerschmitt "bubble"-car term ,the 29 sqm inflatable bubble 1300 W per hour compressor consume,
divide by Volume 1/10 and couple a Rust-rotoverter with modified "net Zero-electric consume"


and the car body platform : e-skateboard like

the stretchable-and foldable car prototypes/models/concepts (Daimler-Benz et cet.)


as vector for an "inflatable bubble electric street scooter " !


Citroen Ami and Opel Rocks with "soft top" ! Or Gar(field) Wood supercar chassis with "(bubble)cabin" !


                                                                  Sedan/Limousine - Targa - Cabrio


1 parking lot = 1 car space                "Smartcar"-law : 1 parking lot = 2 X Smartcar space    1 parking lot =   3/4/.. ic-/e-bike space




1 parking lot = 2x "inflated bubble electric scooter" space


or


1 parking lot = 3/4/.... X  vertical standing "deflated bubble electric scooter " space


less time lost for parking !


Average City-speed/velocity by less  " snail's pace parking lot searcher" increase or traffic flow disturber as "second row parker "  !




WE ARE LIVING IN THE FUTURE :  the "bubble platform" positionizes itself from horizontal to vertical position = autonomous
                                                                           
                                                                                  drives                                                                         autonomous




                     "1001 Nights" and "THE FLYING CARPET " ,pardon  ::)  , autonomous driving board


                                                                                  also,on water,autonomous flairing board


https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Morris_Forschungspreis 1984  https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%BCnther_W._J%C3%B6rg


                                                                                                innovation based by US inventor "Lepichinsky or similar his name"

lancaIV

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20001207&CC=DE&NR=10011074A1&KC=A1


the gasoline IC engine to electric car conversion (gasoil ic engine cars are more difficult to convert ,more costly )


e-drive :  1500 Watt continuous rated/numeric 220 Volt ,50 Hz ,4000 RPM nominal


alibaba offer,condition,price :


https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/4000rpm-electrical-motor-220v.html


f.e.


https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/TOPS-YC-series-220V-2hp-3hp_60543774692.html?spm=a2700.7724857.normal_offer.d_title.b0e76b02Ff4BWW


                                                    $59.00-$66.00 / Piece  (Minimum 50 units gross selling)




                                      battery set :  https://patents.google.com/patent/US20090079393A1/en


                          3 KW modified sine wave inverter 50 US$/ea    3 KW pure sine wave inverter  90 US$/ea


                                                                  battery charger costs ?




                               LiFePo battery 100 US$/KWh capacity for 100 US$ fob factory




The Neo-Messerschmitt cabin-roller is equipped with 1,4 KWh battery capacity !
  But included e-motor/generator brake energy recuperation function !




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
battery-set calculation




2 KWh LiFePo battery capacity              for 300 US$/incl.distribution costs


3 KW modified sine wave inverter for 75 US$/incl. distribution costs


battery charger ,bticcs type, for 100 US$/incl. distribution costs




electric motor calculation :


1,5 KW AC 220 Volt 4000 RPM for 125 US$/incl. distribution costs


1,5 KW AC 220 V with modified Imris capacitive winding 175 US$/incl. distribution costs

https://www.daycounter.com/Calculators/RMS-Calculator.phtml

important for AC-circuit   EMF = positive half-phase /BEMF = negative half-phase      calibration/flip-flop commutation

                                      Lenz and Fleming 3-finger/hand orientation rules applied

                                      in TD :  Gegen-Strom/Elektronen-Waerme-Tauscher / Kreuz-Mittelpunkt   


                                     +/- Voltage(force flux velocity) exchange,quantum-mechanical transmission


 


                                              total 600-650 US$ ,without installation and technical attest costs !


                                                   Before "conversion incentives " !?






We do not need to "scrap" technical/physical semi-new car bodies = stupid economical and not ecological action !






GHG amortized ex-IC engine converted (semi-new) cars compared


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/tech-zukunft/alternative-antriebe/studie-der-tu-eindhoven-gute-co2-bilanz-elektroautos/

It achieves a CO2 equivalent of 78 g / km, which is 54 percent better than the Prius, which is 168 g / km.


I calculate and write about :    1 g CO2 / Km


( not included the external GHG emission during motor and battery production )




The Eindhoven study and my numbers are solely "during driving"  consume electricity or/and fossil/bio fuel use related !


2 KWh battery is to 80% capacity fast re-loaded ! < 1hour,1500 W power outlet





1 g/Km CO2 emission gives advantage over CO2-scrubber investment costs :


https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210310-the-trillion-dollar-plan-to-capture-co2
Costing the planet
Estimates of how much it costs to capture a tonne of CO2 from the air vary widely, ranging from $100 to $1,000 (£72 to £720) per tonne. Oldham says that most figures are unduly pessimistic – he is confident that Climate Engineering can fix a tonne of carbon for as little as $94 (£68), especially once it becomes a widespread industrial process.


high costs estimation 1000 US$/ton for scrub process =


100 000 US$cents/ 1 000 000 Gr. CO2 = 0,1 US$cent per Gr.


or   1 US$/1000 Km range CO2 tributation  ,


compared  for 1 gallon the consumer pays : ? US$ actually ?! Consume per 1000 Km or 595 miles in gallons and tank stations bill ?!




by 100 US$/ton CO2 scrubbing


= 1 US$/10 000 Km range CO2 tributation

                                                                 Attention :

Calculating the CO2-scrubbing costs with :


It achieves a CO2 equivalent of 78 g / km, which is 54 percent better than the Prius, which is 168 g / km.

                  78-168 times the costs per Km drive and 78-168 times the CO2 scrubbing tower capacity need  !











                                        1 g/Km    :      surviveable,I mean,the consequence  !


Saving in car conversion costs gives more financial budget freedom for planet CO2 and other GHG scrubbing !

lancaIV


1 KWh electric consume per 100 Km x 400 g CO2 /KWh german electricity-generation-mix


                                                                             = 4 g /Km


https://patents.google.com/patent/DE4332378A1/en?inventor=Kurt+Fritzsche


                                    claim : 3 Lt./100 Km gasoline consumption


the gasoline engine/generator couple showes us a 40% conversion efficiency


80% engine : Multidisc /Uni Michigan,gun engine modification http://www.rexresearch.com/holubowicz/holubowicz.htm ,
                     patentauction.com albanian inventor 90% claim


                                              1,5 Lt./100 Km gasoline consumption engine


the generator,conventional,change to Iida Kango/Frunzi-Tudor/Akio Hara units


                                              0,9 Lt./100 Km gasoline consumption


                                           Oh,how wonderfull the US-fuel cleanity  8)  :

https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/greenhouse-gas-emissions-typical-passenger-vehicle#:~:text=typical%20passenger%20vehicle%3F-,A%20typical%20passenger%20vehicle%20emits%20about%204.6%20metric%20tons%20of,8%2C887%20grams%20of%20CO2.


How much tailpipe carbon dioxide (CO2) is created from burning one gallon of fuel?


CO2 Emissions from a gallon of gasoline: 8,887 grams CO2/ gallon :o  ( port. gallao /the US gallon : 3,758 lt.)
CO2 Emissions from a gallon of diesel: 10,180 grams CO2/ gallon  :o


                                            epa.gov- page ? REALLY ? Worked out by Dem or Rep or Lib ? agente provocateur  8)


                                                                                        ;D


a little more realistic numbers :


https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/oee/pdf/transportation/fuel-efficient-technologies/autosmart_factsheet_6_e.pdf


Burning 1 L ( circa 850 Gr.)  of gasoline produces approximately 2.3 kg of CO2 .

Carbon has an atomic weight of 12, oxygen has an atomic weight of 16 and CO2 has a molecular weight of 44 (1 carbon atom [12] + 2 oxygen atoms [2 x 16 = 32]).


Therefore CO2 is 3.67 times heavier than carbon (44 ÷ 12 = 3.67).


This is how 1 L of gasoline, which contains about 0.63 kg of carbon, can produce about 2.3 kg of CO2 (3.67 × 0.63 kg = 2.3  kg).






                                            0,9 Lt. x 2,3 Kg = 2,07 Kg per 100 Km CO2 emission


                                                                   0r 20,7 g/ Km


fueling the tank and then the engine with https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2690158A1/en hydro-carb fuel


                                                                        20,7 g / 8 =


                                                            2,6 g/ Km CO2 emission


                                        Option: on-board low cost CO2 vacuum-scrubber


                                                             < 2 g CO2/100 Km emission


                             https://www.tesla.com/en_EU/support/european-union-energy-label


                             modified Fritzsche concept = 1/10 Tesla Inc. all modells CO2 emission/Km


                                                        like all other actual e-cars (Hyndai,....)


                       
   Or : 10 x  Fritzsche,improved concept, cars consumes/emitts per 100 Km  as same as 1 x  Tesla Inc. Modell


         https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.umweltbundesamt.at/news210427


                             High g CO2/Km = high CO2 scrubbing investment costs and landscape spoilage

                              we need a right and intelligent incentive politique


                                                           THINK
                                                           RIGHT
                                                         no hurry
                                                   before investing



Fritzsche concept,unmodified,with Arakelian 7:1 of 8  hydro-carb fuel,without on-board CO2-scrubber  :

                                                  9  g CO2/Km emission


                                           ( equates 2,25 e-KWh/100 Km )

Attention : unmodified Fritzsche rated/nominal electric motor power level


Modified : Ferreira 1 e-wheel on a shaft,2 e-wheels on a shaft ,........ max-power e-engine


     E-Dragster ( electriclouie / Finkel) versus Lamborghini Diablo





                                                                         Fritzsche 2.0 


High 80% conversion efficient ic engine,Arakelian fuel and on-board CO2 scrubber and            Ferreira e-drive




                          from 2 g CO2 /Km                  to                                                               0,2 g CO2 /Km
 

high costs estimation 1000 US$/ton for scrub process =


1000US$ base = 100 000 US$cents/ 1 000 000 Gr. CO2 = 0,1 US$cent per Gr.

Fritzsche 2.0 CO2 scrubber tributation per 1000 Lm drive : for 200 Gr. CO2 emission 0,2 US$


low costs 100 US$ base :                          per 1000 Km drive : for 200 Gr.CO2 emission 2 US$cents



150 x  modified/converted Fritzsche 2.0 cars  emitts such CO2 mass per Km like 1x each  Tesla Inc/Hyndai/VW/MB/.... e-car  ,actually


Like I wrote before,ecological solutions are existent !

A Fritzsche 2.0 kit for middle class car power level for 2000 Euros realizeable
1x 9 KW ic engine ,2x 6 KVA generator and e-drive ,
option co2-scrubber

Converting Technical World 1.0 to Eco-World 2.0,included material and information recycling




btw: 1975-1978           ecological and technical public  standart


https://www.datadiwan.de/netzwerk/index.htm?/moch/moch_2b.htm



Method for improving the combustion process in an internal combustion engine by adding water to the fuel and device for carrying out the method
Inventor: Takeshige Sugimoto, Japan
Offenlegungsschrift 26 32 190
Registration date: 07/16/1976
Quotation page 16, 17:
The test vehicle is a 67 model of the Nissan Sunny type with a 1400 cc machine ...
The test results showed that 1 liter of petrol was used for a distance of 32 km (# this corresponds to 3.125 l / 100 km ) "

https://patents.google.com/patent/US4030453A/en

Water fuel
picture of science, 5-1976, Current Science, page 3
Quote:
The 38-year-old Japanese businessman Takeshige Sugimoto from Tosayama, Tosagun, in Kochi Prefecture presented a fuel he had invented to the press - and went on a long journey with it. In the tank: A mixture of equal parts conventional gasoline and ordinary water ....
Despite a top speed of more than 100 km / h, only 50% of conventional gasoline is used - with extremely low environmental pollution from carbon monoxide and other poisons. "


and


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19820309&CC=US&NR=4318449A&KC=A
A combination of a combustion engine connected to operate intermittently at its point of peak efficiency for effecting recharge of an electric power drive system provides a vehicle drive system capable of 100 miles per gallon.


100 mpg = 2,25 Lt/100 Km gasoline = 2,25 Lt x 2,3 Kg CO2/Lt =


                                                                                =  52 g CO2/Km



/2 for 50/50 gasoline-water mix = 1,125 Lt/100 Km x 2,3 Kg CO2/Lt = 2,59 Kg CO2 emission/100 Km                                                                               
                                                                                = 26 g CO2 /Km





                           Salisbury hybrid and 2011 https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2690158A1/en fuel-gas

                              100 mpg = 2,25 Lt/100 Km x 2,3 Kg/Lt /8 Arakelian hydro-carb fuel-gas 7:1 mix =

                                                                                  = 6,5 g CO2/Km





compared 2021 Tesla car ecological standart :


  https://www.tesla.com/en_EU/support/european-union-energy-label


                                                                                = 23-33 g CO2/ Km

lancaIV

As Conceptionalist developping the "e-World-car/VOLKSAUTO"  :


First Point :


http://www.evalbum.com/motor  updated 2009 ,when this statement ,before update,was written ?  :


" For those accustomed to gas engines, this may not seem like much power, but the rating systems used for gas engines and electric motors are so different that the numbering system is almost meaningless. Gas engines are rated at their peak hp, electric motors are rated at their continuous hp. The peak hp of an electric motor is usually 8 to 10 times its continuous rating.
Electric vehicle drive motors can be divided into two basic groups, DC or direct current motors, and AC or alternating current motors. "


Pure electromagnetic e-motor or pm electric motor peak/continous ? Industrial/commercial e-motor performance at that time ?


Related,to think about : Fred Miekka´s experience with  industry electric motor standart /theoretical physical capacity !


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=fred+miekka&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search


https://citkar.com/de/shop/details-loadster-pick-up/ 


  continous 250 W and peak 1300 W = 5,2 as spread factor  versus "  usually 8 to 10 times "




                       we can/shall also differ : peak from continuous and average ! 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                     Now the conversion base :  der (Mai-)Kaefer,beetle ,,Volkswagen"


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=de&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/VW_K%25C3%25A4fer%23:~:text%3DDer%2520VW%2520K%25C3%25A4fer%2520%28VW%2520Typ,bis%2520Sommer%25202003%2520gebaut%2520wurde.


                    average  ,,Volkswagen" hp to KW,from 16 to19 KW = 18 KW  ,,Volkswagen"  internal combustion engine power


                              conversion to 2021 electric motor version :


18 KW ic-KW as ic-b-KW     b= brake


18 KW ic-engine   / (1300/250 = Loadster  continous/peak spread ) = 3,46 b-KW rated/nominal electric motor power

https://jfautomotive.co.uk/case-studies/calculating-horsepower/

3,46 b-KW rated/nominal electric motor power  x 0,8 (bhp to whp or b-KW to w-KW w= wheel) =


                                                    2,77 w-KW rated in-wheel electric motor power


1. option : we use Watt as power-term ,without determ THE VOLT and the tension  its physical effect !

                higher VOLTAGE (FARADAY ! = higher FORCE) = higher speed max. !


                e-Motor voltage and e-battery voltage !


              3000 Watt 12 Volt DC 250 A                              versus                3000 W 220 Volt AC (RMS attention !) 14 A


                           field / cross road experiment and result in time,Wh,speed average,speed max.comparison !


                          2x   1500 W DC or AC ? Volt ?    https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/in-wheel-motor-1500-watt.html


                          Attention : we see the term " watt-age"~ rated or continuous power and " power" = peak power


            3 w-eKW (w = wheel ,e = electric)= more nominal rated power ( or " wattage")does  the international "VOLKSAUTO" not need   !
















Following his technological evolution : https://www.youtube.com/c/ViktorArestov/videos           compared Fred Miekka conventional motor modification/improvement


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://pedelec-elektro-fahrrad.de/news/arestov-neuer-motor-fuer-alltagstaugliche-e-bikes/16000/



The motor dispenses with the use of permanent magnets, i.e. rare earths, which, as a positive side effect, not only results in greater environmental friendliness, but also a reduction in manufacturing costs.


The drive is also lighter, quieter and equally suitable for eBikes and pedelecs. It is also suitable for use in electric cars or electric motorcycles.


The range is a decisive factor when choosing a pedelec or eBike. The new development, which is based on the basic principle of combined windings, scores here as well.


https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/M9_yU5hN1zs


With this technology, a 3 kW asynchronous motor could be built from a 1.5 kW permanent magnet motor.


The temperature problems that often occur with wheel hub motors are also unknown to him and can tolerate overheating of 150 ° C, e.g. when driving uphill.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uw2Y5ZVaMPk


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJYgQJQadek


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJYgQJQadek - 6:49+  regenerative braking ! and battery recharge

related GarWoods supercar : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na8NYhRrrUs