Milkovic's Pendulum

[Floor]

1. Do pendulums remain in motion longer than do balanced spinning wheels
in which the plane of their rotation is aligned with the force of gravity ?

2. Do balanced spinning wheels in which the plane of their rotation is aligned
with the force of gravity remain in motion longer than do unbalanced spinning wheels
in which the plane of their rotation is aligned with the force of gravity ?

Simple questions.

The answers are no, unless there are friction losses or losses due to energy
being translated into unproductive direction by vibration in one case more so
than the other.

Are you aware of this ?

And yet You don't understand that a swinging pendulum can do no work except that which
is equal to the work that was put into it.  Neither do you understand that a pendulum
in its self, does no work that is not then undone by its own motion.

It is true that a pendulum without these kinds of losses and others, would probably
stay in motion for practically forever.  This does not change the fact that it contains
no energy that was not put in to it by the initial lifting of the pendulum.  Nor the fact
that any energy which is extracted from its motions will decrease the energy content
of the pendulum.

You need to be more creative here than any thing you have presented so far, because
energy does not come from that aspect of inertia which is momentum.

Rest assured, I am already aware that you are not capable of answering simple
direct questions.

[Johnsmith]

1. Do pendulums remain in motion longer than do balanced spinning wheels
in which the plane of their rotation is aligned with the force of gravity ?

2. Do balanced spinning wheels in which the plane of their rotation is aligned
with the force of gravity remain in motion longer than do unbalanced spinning wheels
in which the plane of their rotation is aligned with the force of gravity ?

Simple questions.

The answers are no, unless there are friction losses or losses due to energy
being translated into unproductive direction by vibration in one case more so
than the other.

Are you aware of this ?

  And when I read your question, I decide to think about something meaningful so I had mashed potatoes,
mixed vegetables and chicken for lunch. And yes, I did enjoy my lunch.
As for you, do you know how to convert Pi into radians, or degrees or vice versa? If you can't consider
leverage and work then what are you talking about? Your opinion? And yet in both threads specific designs
have been shown which the work that allows for them is based on math.
If you consider how you refuted your own answer which it dawned on you they will be built differently and
thus will work differently. And my mixed vegetables had diced potatoes while I also had mashed potatoes.
And you need to remember, I am working towards realizing perpetual motion and proving that Bessler was successful.
And other people in here share the same goal. There are a couple of tests that thx4 and Robinhood46 can try which
would help them to understand what I am talking about.

[Floor]

' ' ' '

[Merg]

FROM VELJKO MILKOVIC'S NEWSLETTER:

Veljko Milkovic would like to share with you his newest video where he presented his latest achievements in the field of two-stage oscillator development – a new improved model with an elastic (flexible) pendulum and elastic (flexible) lever which is far more efficient than the previous oscillator versions.

This fast and superior model has been significantly improved with elastic oscillations that give a better result with both the pendulum and the lever. The work is still underway on further technical improvements.

New Fast and Improved Two-Stage Oscillator (VIDEO)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wn15yJ9JYY

* English subtitles available in the video player settings *


This advanced technology is being investigated on all continents. There are now over 500 companies from Southeast Asia that are producing, developing and practically applying the machines based on the principle of Veljko Milkovic's two-stage oscillator.

[Johnsmith]

FROM VELJKO MILKOVIC'S NEWSLETTER:

Veljko Milkovic would like to share with you his newest video where he presented his latest achievements in the field of two-stage oscillator development – a new improved model with an elastic (flexible) pendulum and elastic (flexible) lever which is far more efficient than the previous oscillator versions.

This fast and superior model has been significantly improved with elastic oscillations that give a better result with both the pendulum and the lever. The work is still underway on further technical improvements.

New Fast and Improved Two-Stage Oscillator (VIDEO)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wn15yJ9JYY

* English subtitles available in the video player settings *


This advanced technology is being investigated on all continents. There are now over 500 companies from Southeast Asia that are producing, developing and practically applying the machines based on the principle of Veljko Milkovic's two-stage oscillator.

It's actually a single stage oscillator. It has only one swinging pendulum. That is where I have let his research team know about this thread.
A 2 - stage oscillation requires 2 pendulums. Veljko deserves credit for the interest he has raised in this because it does help people as well.
By making a perpetual machine inspired by his work would be a new invention. In Ancient Egypt they irrigated their fields using something
similar. The weight on the other end of the lever wasn't swung. It allowed water to be pulled from the Nile River more easily. With a perpetual
motion design, more work could be done. This would be torque vs power. And for crushing either grain or ore, power is necessary.
Old stone mills used actual stones for crushing grain. This is why windmills and water wheels powered them. And this is what I have suggested,
harnessing the inertial force of a pendulum. If Velko and his team wish to work with thx4, Robinhood46 and myself on this, it would be out of
respect for what he has done. And who knows, maybe no one will be interested in what I have proposed. And that is okay if that is what people
decide.