Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

Started by ramset, March 14, 2022, 11:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Sergh

Quote from: lancaIV on August 09, 2023, 04:57:36 AM
Sergh,not motionless transformer, but rotoverter

Rotoverter ist cool, besonders wenn es funktionieren würde.  ;D

Quote from: lancaIV on August 09, 2023, 04:57:36 AMWhat did the applicant think,what in his description as process and effect happens/happened :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19981126&CC=DE&NR=29812556U1&KC=U1#
Claims of DE29812556

Quote1. Gerät zur Verbesserung der Generatorleistung.

Durch zusammenschließen eines Stromkreises mit hoher Spannung (z.B. 220 V) mit einem Stromkreis mit hohem Strom (z.B. 50 A)

2. Gerät nach Schutzanspruch 1.

Der Strom wird von einem Generator abgenommen. Die Generatorausgangsleistung wird ohne einwirkung von von Fremdströmen erhöht.

Von dem unter 1 genannten Anspruch sind ausgenommen z.B. Drehstromschweißgeräte, denn dort wird aus 3 schwächeren Phasen eine stärkere Phase (Schweißstrom) gemacht.
(facepalm)
Dies ist genau das, was in der russischsprachigen Freie Energie - Gemeinschaft ironischerweise ,,eine Schlange und einen Igel heiraten" genannt wird.

rakarskiy

Quote from: Sergh on August 09, 2023, 04:39:39 AM
Rakarskiy, I have one simple question for you:

- if you are sure that your motor generates more energy than is consumed, why do you need to make a motor, then somehow convert mechanical energy into electrical energy?
If you are sure that there is free energy in the motor or generator, then make an over-unity transformer instead of the motor. The transformer is much simpler and more reliable in operation.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
https://www.google.com/search?q=overunity+transformer

Mechanical power and electrical power are different things. A flux switching motor produces more shaft power (Pk=Fv) than is consumed (Pe=IU) by the electric excitation system, but the magnetic flux force of the permanent magnets is used to produce torque. With an appropriate regeneration algorithm, a portion of the electrical power (Pe=IU) can be returned to the system for re-excitation. Thus the balance of consumption will be inclusive of regeneration, i.e. less.  The torque on the shaft can be used for various mechanical power consumers, including overcoming the electromagnetic torque of the generator.  If the motor has 10-16 thousand revolutions per minute, the generator operating speed of 3000 rpm requires a gearbox. If the generator is performed in the same way with technology to reduce the resulting electromagnetic torque, again the result in the end will be even more interesting. With a slave wheel - flywheel, as a stabilizer of mechanical rotation, the most successful variant for the generator operation.  We have only one gear, to the edge of the driven wheel (flywheel), if you use even magnetic in general fairy tale, only cost.Purely engineering solution for electromagnetic mechanical construction. The question is that the corresponding developed system is required. Creation of such a motor requires a technological procedure. Those who are interested in it do it, I know it for sure.

About static designs I do not have exact verified data, I am just working on it.
Except naturally for the Holcomb system, but this is an algorithm of synchronous mechanical electromagnetic generator. This system has its own "buboes" - system start-up, and holding current in phase at changing loads.

Sergh

Quote from: rakarskiy on August 09, 2023, 05:22:21 AM
Mechanical power and electrical power are different things.
Oh really?
Both power is measured in watts. But power is not interesting at all in our topic. Energy is important, which is also measured in the same joules or kilowatt-hours, if it is more convenient.
You can always place coils directly on your engine to collect electrical energy, so as not to make an additional mechanical connection with the generator.No matter how efficient, less efficiency will create less load and less consumption.
And then what's the point in rotating a piece of iron on a stick?
The magnetic field in the motor rotates without it.
Why then useless rotation of iron?

rakarskiy

Quote from: Sergh on August 09, 2023, 05:30:40 AM
Oh really?
Both power is measured in watts. But power is not interesting at all in our topic. Energy is important, which is also measured in the same joules or kilowatt-hours, if it is more convenient.
You can always place coils directly on your engine to collect electrical energy, so as not to make an additional mechanical connection with the generator.
And then what's the point in rotating a piece of iron on a stick?
The magnetic field in the motor rotates without it.
Why then useless rotation of iron?

It is always a question of technical and financial capabilities of the one who does it. The lower the frequency of the generator, the less reactive resistance in its circuit. Hardware base for high-frequency systems is also not happy with its price. So, everything is in the realm of engineering solutions based on the budget and technical feasibility.

lancaIV

Sergh,Nein !For easier understanding it is said electric and/or mechanical Watt,but officially W or VA ,technical art/kind dependent !
We can lower Watt linear or increase,VA not linear ,affecting V gives A reaction  : Ohms law !
Rotoverter ist cool, besonders wenn es funktionieren würde.
The generator side is recuperating unused motor energy,recuperation process like from cars or cranes !
100 unit consume/30 units recuperation( included charger,battery losts)

Improveable !

A russian inventor tried to sold his comercial right about 2x efficiency related conventional welding transformer improved  output,in the 90': old,archive.org now,www.1000inventions..com ,an  international R&D exposition site,now www.inpama.com

wmbr
OCWL

p.s.: Sergh  ,100/30 = 3,33 times need for higher battery charge and mathematical ' eternal function' !


         motor from battery 1 sourced

        generator charging battery 2

        battery 2 charging battery 1,intermittent between both batteries

https://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=JP&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=2003009558&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=ja&TRGLANG=en
[0017]
Therefore, by designing a specific magnetic path based on the AC power source to be used, its frequency, and the desired output power, it is possible to obtain an output power several times to several tens of times greater than the input power. Since the device is small and can be easily manufactured, it can be realized at extremely low cost.In addition, there is no risk of disturbing the environment such as generation of vibration, noise, exhaust gas waste, etc. in power generation. It is a power generation method and a power generation device that greatly contribute to the reduction of electricity.


3,33 ~ several times

improvement :  primary coil [ (pseudo-)supercondutive ]
Haende ueberm Kopf( a.ausruhen ! , b.OMG,solch ein Schwachsinn ! ) :

Ohm,Kirchhoff related :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=5&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20070201&CC=JP&NR=2007028879A&KC=A#
3,33 times ~ 4 nichrome coils
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=7&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20150427&CC=PT&NR=107252A&KC=A#
legal status ? Which performance ?
This same inventor :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=10&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20131028&CC=PT&NR=106273A&KC=A#
less resistance = higher speed/torque
Comparing :
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.unii.ac.jp/erina-unp/archive/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/B-OKUNOYA-e.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiXlPztuc-AAxU0VqQEHZZxAPAQFnoECAcQAg&usg=AOvVaw1R6VM3WZOc2VMpHkQ6ZZJE
The generator !

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130038069A1/de
[0041] When coaxial inversion occurs between the housing main body 11 and the coil body 31 housed thereinside as stated above, providing that the velocity V 2 (rotating velocity) attained when either the flux linkage magnets or the coil body is rotated while the other is fixed is "1," the relative velocity V 1 between the first and second flux linkage magnets 21 , 22 within the housing main body 11 and the coil portion 32 within the coil body 31 is twice the same, "2" (V 1 =2V 2 ). Consequently, a generated power output as large as "4 times" the generated power output obtained when either the flux linkage magnets or the coil body is rotated while the other is fixed can be realized at the coil portion 32 within the coil body 31 . Namely, the disk-shaped coaxial inversion generator 1 ensuring strikingly large generated power output (that is, high conversion efficiency from natural energy to electric power) can be realized.

Fixed/variable relative velocity      versus         cw variable/ccw variable relative velocity

use ? wind or [0061]
Instead wind-/waterwheel-rotor an electro-permanent-magnetic rotor-drive ?


Halbach-/Ronbach-array motor as drive ,an object and the coupled generator/alternator ?
https://www.voanews.com/a/can-better-electric-motor-save-planet/4235140.html


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=2013062983A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20130314&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

The novel magnet array disclosed herein can also replace every, or substantially every, use of conventional magnets which are used in motors, generators, transformers, or any device that produces or transmits electricity with the use of magnets, in order to make such applications more efficient and/or powerful.

Rotoverter ist cool, besonders wenn es funktionieren würde.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SdhAfMor9BM

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&q=hildenbrand+jack+magnet+&oq=hildenbrand+jack+magnet+&aqs=heirloom-srp..
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&ei=P4HTZOfdM_GO9u8Pnfa26A8&q=hildenbrand+jack+magnet&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwin-cH3xM-AAxVxh_0HHR27Df0Q7Al6BAgFEAI&biw=600&bih=888#imgrc=J6oV5CPbnJmMDM

DC,AC,AC frequency input ?