Global Warming, unstoppable

[Kator01]

Hello ResinRat,

some time ago I have been attacked on a personal level ( here your grammer is a reflection or part of your of your personality ) by an it-chief of a swiss bank where I was doing a coding-concept for an SAP-Application.
A software-engineer had made some grave error and the application failed.
So in talking out  this situation the chief suddenly attacked me personally by simply stating I was a failure myself. When we went out of meeting one of my fellow coworker said to me : "We have won the case, he has attacked you on a personal level. It is common management-knowledge that -  if a person runs out of arguements or is confronted with sound arguments or proof - he shows this behaviour- this is his way out of the situation"

Period

I simply do nor pay any attention to this scrap any longer because any amount of scientific proof ( and the facts at www.physiker.com/klima are clear ) you might present will give more rise to more silly counter-attacks.
You can not enlighten a person of such an attitude. It is scientifically prooven that you only reinforce that content of awareness the person already has.
So, is is simply a waste of time.
Sad enough.

Regards

Kator01

[Kator01]

Hi ResinRat,

here is the scientific article I referred to - written by Dr. Robert Schwarz in

Advances in Experimental Social Psychology #39:

http://www.powells.com/biblio?isbn=9780120152391

It is in chapter 3 :

Chapter 3

Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns

Norbert Schwarz, Lawrence J. Sanna, Ian Skurnik, and Carolyn Yoon

I think it is worth reading.

Here is the original Study as pdf :

http://sitemaker.umich.edu/norbert.schwarz/files/07_aep_schwarz_et_al_setting-people-straight.pdf

Also of interest : Goebbel-Propaganda-Principles :

http://www.psywarrior.com/Goebbels.html

Kator01

[WilbyInebriated]

interesting read kator, still laughing that you call it a 'scientific' article.

[Kator01]

You are laughing at yourself, dear.
You have not even got a clue of what this study is all about

Kator

[WilbyInebriated]

You are laughing at yourself, dear.
You have not even got a clue of what this study is all about

Kator

well i guess you set me straight...

first off, i was laughing at you calling it scientific... second, i am not your 'dear'. interesting that you post a reference to a social psychology article and then proceed to tell me what i am doing and what i do or don't have a clue about... how typical.
actually i do, it's more psycho-semantic garbage. just like the global warming debate. one side says it's this, they can't prove it of course. then other side says it's not this, it's that. and of course they can't prove it either. social psychology is no different. it's pseudo science. it's just wasting what precious time you have on argument.