Barbat low inertial mass generator

[Schpankme]

For me this patent presents many red flags, in the first paragraph.  Sit back and read while the buzz words flow.

"Electrical oscillations in a metallic "sending coil" radiate inductive photons toward one or more "energy-magnifying coils" comprised of a photoconductor or doped semiconductor coating a metallic conductor, or comprised of a superconductor. Electrons of low inertial mass in the energy-magnifying coil(s) receive from the sending coil a transverse force having no in-line backforce, which exempts this force from the energy-conservation rule. The low-mass electrons in the energy-magnifying coil(s) receive increased acceleration proportional to normal electron mass divided by the lesser mass. Secondarily radiated inductive-photon energy is magnified proportionally to the electrons' greater acceleration, squared."

Red Flags

1) radiate inductive photons
2) Electrons of low inertial mass in the energy-magnifying coil(s) receive from the sending coil
3) transverse force having no in-line backforce, which exempts this force from the energy-conservation rule.
4) electrons in the energy-magnifying coil(s)
5) normal electron mass divided by the lesser mass.
6) Secondarily radiated inductive-photon energy is magnified proportionally to the electrons' greater acceleration, squared.

Big Bang is dead,

- Schpankme

[tak22]

@Schpankme

For me this patent presents many red flags, in the first paragraph.  Sit back and read while the buzz words flow.

I've read your post a few times now and I'm still not sure where you're trying to get with it.  yes, there are buzz words, but they all make sense if Barbat is correct in his discovery. yes, they're all packed into the Abstract, but that's kinda how you have to write a summary.

this patent is all about creating coils with unique physical characteristics that allow for the magnifying of incident energy, and either this is true or it isn't.  no analysis of the words used or the supporting "story/history/logic/etc" that Barbat includes in the patent will mean anything until this can be shown to be true or false, and that's what I'm working towards.

@all

I think it's very significant that Barbat is publicly saying that his patent is alive and well and being pursued.

tak

we are indulging ourselves into non-existence

[Schpankme]

I've read your post a few times now and I'm still not sure where you're trying to get with it.

tak22,

My points speak for themselves.  Please provide factual answers to the six (6) points; or concede that Barbat has engaged in Techno-Babble; and such verbiage is useless.

1) radiate inductive photons

  "So what's a Photon? or do we chalk this up to Big Bang BS ?"

2) Electrons of low inertial mass

  "How many electron types are there (low, high, medium, normal, just right" ?  You ever seen an electron ?

3) transverse force having no in-line backforce

  "is this a poor description of BEMF"?

4) electrons in the energy-magnifying coil(s)

  "more electrons have been found - HOW" ?

5) normal electron mass divided by the lesser mass

  "what MASS are we dividing here, what's a normal electron"?

6) radiated inductive-photon energy is magnified proportionally to the electrons' greater acceleration, squared

  "so Barbat claims to have magnified Photon energy via the square of the accelerated electrons ... how do you verify this ... see points above"


- Schpankme

[tak22]

another William Barbat sighting today, this time from the Stanford Magazine, Jan/Feb 08 issue:

Cosmic theorist Andrei Linde missed important breakthroughs that turned some cherished theories into science fiction. Wm. G. Tifft (1976, 1977) found that the Hubble red-shift bears no resemblance to a universal Doppler shift because it is quantized, step-like. This means that the universe is not expanding or inflating and that the Big Bang never happened.

Also Shpenkov and Kreidik (2002) found that the heat source, which sustains the cosmic background radiation at the measured peak blackbody temperature of 2.725?0.002?K, must be due to radiation from the orbital electron motion of interstellar hydrogen at its fundamental period, which they calculated to be 2.7289?K. This is another face of the internal heat source, named Nullpunktenergie (Zero Point Energy) by Einstein and Stern, that keeps helium in a liquid condition at an ambient temperature near absolute zero unless a pressure of 25 atmospheres is applied to make the helium freeze solid. This perpetual low-grade heat source was described by Joseph Larmor (1897), who realized that electric charges give off radiation when their direction of acceleration is changed (like cyclotron radiation and synchrotron radiation), so that orbiting electrons must radiate energy indefinitely.

William N. Barbat, ââ,¬â,,¢51, MS ââ,¬â,,¢52
Lake Oswego, Oregon

Barbat appears to be impressed by Joseph Larmor as he also references him frequently in his patent.

@Schpankme

sorry, but I can't provide facts or concede that Barbat has engaged in Techno-Babble.  facts for me will appear when I see before my own eyes that I can or can't replicate anything of significance.  it will be useless to engage me in debate on the patent language or "facts" as I don't have a suitable background.  I do think I can recognize a sincere effort to present a valid patent application, and if I'm wrong, that'll be my problem.

tak

PS. got my DSO shipment notice today! it's on it's way! hurray! 

[Schpankme]

I do think I can recognize a sincere effort to present a valid patent application, and if I'm wrong, that'll be my problem.

tak22,

Your not thinking clearly and you've dismissed the Techno-Babble as a "sincere effort to present a valid patent application".  Personally, I hope your testing is rewarding.

Best regards,

- Schpankme