Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field

Started by bob.rennips, May 30, 2007, 12:57:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

z_p_e

Quote from: bob.rennips on June 18, 2007, 07:21:31 AM
Having duplicated Otto&Jason's driver/mosfet combination I've now got a much better setup. The main difference other that using a low side driver and not the high side driver, is the addition of two decoupling capacitors directly across the power inputs to the driver. This removed much of the rubbish and I was getting much crisper square waves when entering high khz 500K+.

I've also noticed that when applying a larger 24V across the coil to generate the static magnetic field, that the ability of one coil to induce into another coil is cut in half, REGARDLESS of the direction of current applied to generate the static magnetic field. In other words it doesn't matter whether N is top of the coil or bottom of the coil, they both have the effect of reducing the coupling between the two inducing bifilar coils.

I expected this to happen in one direction, but thought that in the other direction there would be an enhancement.

Bob,

If you are using a ferromagnetic core, perhaps it was being saturated with the static field applied, and not without it. This would explain the reduced coupling.

Darren

brnbrade

Hello all

This morning I played with resonant frequencies of my walkman in the ring tpu that I built.
I input whit 2 cells 1.5v, and collect 52v 1A in output.
When I decided to put a permanent magnetic ring in turn of the rings collectors and...
Amaze, the readings jumped for more than 250v. with two cell my reader was crazy.

I hope help

Regards

chrisC

@brnbrade

Great! Can you tell us a little bit more of your setup, circuit, current measurements and ring structure please? There is not enough information from your post to understand what we are supposed to understand? Thank you.

Regards
chrisC

brnbrade

Quote from: chrisC on June 24, 2007, 12:30:58 AM
@brnbrade

Great! Can you tell us a little bit more of your setup, circuit, current measurements and ring structure please? There is not enough information from your post to understand what we are supposed to understand? Thank you.

Regards
chrisC

Hi ChrisC
My TPU comprise in 24 turns medium wire  and 1000 turns more fine wire in parallel, mounted in pvc tube and isolated well isolated. I put permanent magneto ring in turn of the tpu and reader  jumped as crazy above the 250v.

TKS

chrisC

Hi brnbrade:

Thanks for the reply. What was your input frequency (assuming only one?) into the primary and was there analog ammeters measuring the currents in the primary and secondary? A photo or graphics image of the circuit would really be appreciated if that was not too much trouble for you.

Thanks

chrisC