Chas Campbell free power motor

[Humbugger]

I have asked one very simple and very important question to which no answer is provided in any of the literature referenced.  I am in need of no sympathy. 

Is there any reasonable evidence and, if so, what, to support the idea that the neon circuit will charge a battery more rapidly than the RV discharges an equivalent battery for its driving energy?  That is the question.

I am betting that, when push comes to shove, that it's not even close to charging the secondary battery fast enough to do a swapped self-runner.  Not by any stretch.  The claim seems to be that the neon circuit will shove lots of charge into an auxilliary battery with no increase in the drain on the driving battery. 

23A or 26A is what the last video I watched showed as a running DC current at 11.8V on the input motor battery.  To do self-running, the neon circuit would need to charge the aux battery at the same or higher rate, would it not?   

By inspection only, as a design engineer, I can see from the circuit diagram and component values alone, without building anything, that the neon circuit as published will never provide self-running levels of extraction and auxilliary battery charging.

Ashtweth, you are avoiding the hard facts as if they were bitter poison and now running crying to Stefan whining like a spoiled child.  You may be the teacher's pet, but your tactics tonight have shown everyone here just what you are all about.

Humbugger

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

This is another example why not to ask/answer this user name concerning the RV, and how suspicious and counter productive his posts have become. Plus off topic.

All available informations are provided in the published compilations and this has been pointed out to this user name already in many posts.

Also i have merely advised [as it states in my above post] how to address this user name  to Stefan based on my opinion concerning his experience with the RV and on this circuit. His understanding [and experience] of how the RV works and based upon his attitude and time wasting methodology. [this is for his benefit if any]

Its too easy for me to insult a suspicious and or oil man, an alleged disabled man looking for sympathy with no lab, and or to be aggressive to an old man who would have trouble lifting half the weights i could, and who has an attitude which is obvious to me and some others as useless.

But i will say this based on those who like to lol, follow his OU advice  that sim programs can show OU, and to not to build any thing and rely on skepticism with out finding out for your self.

No simulation program can show ZPE, radiant energy , or any of the principles which the engineers who have worked with the RV have tested and reported. The lab is the best education, especially when concerning the RV .

So how ever useful you find This user names design engineering (which cannot explain OU), don't expect it to show what the RV engineers have reported in the lab. Their instructions and how to are posted in the comps.

Lab tests are needed by those we trust, not skepticism- Ashtweth
.
PS Words that do not match deeds are unimportant. -  Ernesto Che Guevara
This was quiet fun to point out that concerning the RV, a man with out a lab is truly a disabled one.
Plus  to improve attitudes and not to rely on skepticism alone .

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

PS, Guys, we are off for the tests, i wont have internet till Monday so please be patient.

Ill get the separate pulsed watt hour meter results posted HERE on sat and Sunday so you guys don't have to wait for our production/presentation 

Ill show the video of all the requests and Stefans Ball request too on SAT night/sun day morning, our production is coming later and will how the concept of the other [gravity] devices and a few other things so plenty to come. My friend will post this info as i wont have internet till Monday.

Have a good night guys.

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

Quote:

Words that do not match deeds are unimportant. -  Ernesto Che Guevara

End of Quote, Beginning of comment :-)

Anyone that believes this has never read Plato, Anaximander, Aristoteles, Socrates and a whole heap of other philosophers that did not exactly match their words with their deeds in everyday life.

According to that idiot terrorist Che Guevera they were unimportant.

For my money I know who made a better and more lasting impression on the world.

Hans von Lieven

[sm0ky2]

Gravity Wheel::


concerning the leverage necessary to keep the wheel in motion, if you have 3 balls going down on one side and 3 going up (this must occur simultaneously) and the distances from the center of rotation were 2:1 respectively
you would essentially have 6 units of force fighting 3 units of force (+ friction). Upon a 2-day examination of the various wheel diagrams and things that have been pointed out in this discussion - i see no reason this wheel would not work.

Things to consider - the slope of the horizontal ramps will determine the RPM of the wheel.
i.e. - the time it takes for a single ball to travel from one side to the other down the sloped plane.
This can be countered by adding "extra" balls into the system, so that theres always a ball ready to drop into the respective bucket. 

My calculations were done using the interior diameter of the outer wheel and the exterior of the inner wheel as locations of the buckets. as long as 1.5 balls is heavy enough to counter the forces trying to stop the wheels motion (friction, imbalance, ect) then the wheel will turn.