Chas Campbell free power motor

[gaby de wilde]

When someone can get a steel ball and a magnet ramp to operate ............

I'm going to attach an image for you so that you can see this device has a magnetic ball.

This means the device is NOT A SMOT RAMP.

It doesn't even look like a smot ramp!

Who said this was a SMOT?

[tinu]

Hi all,

It?s been a long thread and, by now, it should be obvious that Campbell?s machine is not working. Not the slightest chance.

Are you kidding ?
I even have not yet seen the second video which was removed  and
this weekend?s  measurements of Ash and his team are not in yet...

@ Stefan,
Banning Hum again is not only the greatest insult to his person but it goes beyond that.
You may be empowered to ban him, Stefan, as others may be empowered to take the OU.com domain from you and shut the whole thing down. Abusive? Yes, exactly my point.

Tinu

You are comparing apples with oranges.
You probably did not see the posting, where Humbugger made fun of Gaby de Wilde (it is now deleted)
and even posted Gaby?s  real picture without permission into the thread and putting it
beneath some drunken guys pics and making fun of Gaby.

I can not accept these kind of users over here  harrassing this way other users and he
already had a prior warning with his abusive postings.

Unfortunately I?m not kidding about Campbell?s wheel. It is unworkable, as not only the theory predicts but also the video. The wheel is working only as long as some balls drop off on the down side and are repositioned by hand (or by other external means) on the upper side.

Actually, not only the Campbell?s wheel is unworkable but, as seen from the other thread, the flywheel generator is unworkable also. I?m sorry but it was a false alarm all the way. Why should I joke about it? It is the sad reality.

As for Humbugger, I suppose you did not check the posts of Gaby de Wilde, haven?t you?
Please do so.
It is interesting that you decided to ban a member for copying a picture from the public domain into the public domain (?! what?s the fault here?!) and you did not take a single step against one who used words like ?moron, idiot, stupid, liar, miserable, coward, ass? etc. etc. in addressing various fine members here. Not even a warning?!  Well, can you reasonably justify it, at least?
I would partially understand your decision if he was of any use here. But, after reviewing most of his posts, to use just one of the words he may like (as he uses them a lot) as a conclusion, he?s nothing more than an ass-kissing of free energy. Other than that, his contribution here is zero or worse (is leading to disinformation).

Not further than several days ago, another ?nice? appellative was added to the above list, which keeps growing and growing. It?s ?imbecile?. You can read the post here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3275.0.html
All the appellatives used by gaby de wilde as well as many others of the same kind are verifiable in his former posts.

If you like this kind of members, fine.
I don?t.

Compared him with Hum?!
Better we save the time?

Tinu

[RoadRunner]

What our understanding? Their own ignorance you mean! I don't like to be auto subscribed to foul 3rd party ignorance! I don't like to be told what my understanding of something is.

My apologies. I looked hard to see where you thought I was telling you what your understanding is and eventually I realised that by my statement 'our understanding' I'd implied as much.
Perhaps a more appropriate terminology would have been 'popular' or 'conventional' understanding, then.

So when I try to create a closed loop smot the last thing I'm interested in a discussion about CoE, it's utter nonsense!!  Nonsense preaching!

Don't let my preaching stop you... Show us the goods you'll convert the preacher.

I had this discussion about 500 times now, and I'm 100% convinced you are not going to say a single thing that is usefull or even interesting in the context of conservation of energy.

And you're telling me this, because.....?? Are you trying to suggest that I should shut up or that if I don't you're not going to pay any attention to anything I say anyway ??

He must have done something horrible for you to hate him like that. For now you are the one offending him IMHO. Please correct this error of mine eh?

...Beat with a fish? Cant you think of a more elaborate torture method?

Sure, I could.... but I guess you're going to turn your nose up at my humour, so why waste the effort ?
I wasn't seriously advocating torturing the guy at all.
Yes, he made a toy... Not an over-unity machine.
People also rant about other misnomers, oxymorons and contradictions in terms, especially for the sake of humour...

I'm not going to apologize to anyone for sharing my thoughts about anything.

None expected or asked for. You're telling me this for what reason ?

You think you are in a position where you can claim people should shut up when you say they should???

You're entitled to think what you like about me. To jump to all the conclusions you choose but it bodes heavily on your credibility if you demonstrate that you jump to those conclusions without evidence.
Would you like to show me where I told anyone to shut up ?

I understand you perfectly well.

Then, Gaby, you are one heck of a genius especially in the field of psychology.

Personally I'm all done with this treatment.

Does that mean you're cured ?
... of whatever it was for which you were receiving treatment, that is..

I mean you do have to overcome your personal frustrations with it.

Or... is it that you've got to overcome your own issues with what you perceive as other people's frustrations ?
If you've no intention of apologising for your thoughts and feelings and are quite happy to air them..
... and I've no objection to you airing them...
... then why should your personal frustrations be acceptable, and mine not ?

I don't really want to argue with you Gaby... Or anyone... I've been trying to remain reasonably light-hearted and humourous but if people don't appreciate my humour, is fine... I can keep it to myself.

You think fish slapping will do the trick?

No... Wet fish are for the likes of snake-oil salesmen and bad-scientists.

The torture in store for the perpetually frustrated is far more pleasant...

Smile.

The RoadRunner..

[RoadRunner]

When someone can get a steel ball and a magnet ramp to operate ............

I'm going to attach an image for you so that you can see this device has a magnetic ball.

This means the device is NOT A SMOT RAMP.

Premise:
1 ) Device with magnetic ball is not a SMOT ramp. Sorry... Get the capitalisation right... NOT A SMOT RAMP.
2 ) Steel is magnetic

Conclusion:
Devices with steel balls intended to roll into a magnetic gradient are not SMOT ramps.

Isn't that what I've been saying all along...?

They're SMUT ramps.

The RoadRunner..

[sm0ky2]

roadrunner, open mouth, insert foot. sit back and enjoy.


SMOT:  Simple Magnetic Overunity Toy

invented in 1985 by Greg Watson (australia)

consisted of an inclined plane line with 2 magnetic rails (of opposite polarity) and slightly staggered

The ball was made of Steel, and thus attracted to the magnets, traveled UP the incline, where it dropped through a hole, rolled back to the begining to start its climb up the ramp once again.

This system was never shown to repeat itself more than a few times, without outside energy to start the cycle again.

--- The Ball was STEEL. - now, as i agree with your original NON_SMOT argument of the first design - as the ball was actually magnetic, makine the first design NOT a smot,
the second one, using a steel ball - does not exclude it from SMOT device category. it has a steel ball, it has an inclinded plane, and it has a magnetic attraction to draw it upwards.. in all outside appeareance, it "could be" a SMOT.....