Chas Campbell free power motor

[hartiberlin]

I must agree,
that Omnibus sometimes is using bad words,
but I also understand why he is doing it.

As most people just don?t realize, that the SMOT really works and
is overunity.

How often do we have to explain it again and again ?

There are several videos out there, that show without a doubt,
that the SMOT ball gains energy ba going through the ramp.

There is no point anymore in discussion.
The problem still is to get it used.

Nobody has yet build a longer SMOT ramp of e.g. 1 Meter long and
a bigger height difference, so the energy gain is enough to
loop the ball back to the entrance.

Only Greg Watson and Epitaxyhad been having looped SMOTs,
but as they did build it so small, in scale, the friction influence was
just too big all the time and the ball sticked after a few cycles to the
track, because it was too much accelerated, etc...

The SMOT really needs a big setup with very precise mechanical
building and very precise control of the running ball,
otherwise you will not get it to loop.

But please stop the flamewar and hammering onto Omnibus.

The SMOT principle works.

[hartiberlin]

Hi All,
please stay ontopic,
This is the Chas Campbell thread.
I will delete all flamewar postings and namecalling postings.

Please fight via private email,if you must fight each other.
Thanks.

[Pirate88179]

I agree. Using add-on toolbars can cause a lot of problems with windows xp and i.e. I have had problems with this in the past and deleteing all the toolbar add-ons fixed the problems.  Can someone convert the video and upload it here? Thank you.

Bill

[crazyman]

Of course not. you stupid incompetent moron jerk idiot. 
I hope that answers your question. burk,

Omni, one standard in science has always been the repeatability of something.
Is there an independent source that has tried this or sources to validate the claims made ?

[hansvonlieven]

posting under a different alias omnibus?

still not game to show your face? it MUST be ugly.

Hans von Lieven