The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

[z_p_e]

Hi Darren,
he posted his schematic over here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2630.msg37778.html#msg37778

He tried to replicate the
MacFarland patent and now used alufoil as an additional layer and seems to have succeeded.

It seems to be the alufoil, that makes the difference.

I guess if we can get a selfrunner this way, it is easy to scale
up to over 50 Watts and I guess this will be a great device for the OverUnity Prize ?!

Stefan, I already saw that. It is just a reiteration of the Cook patent. Am I missing something?

Where are the capacitors, the audio inputs, the battery, the transistor? etc. etc.

That is not a complete or accurate drawing of what he has there.

Darren

[chrisC]

Darren:

I believe Brnbrade is not trying to deceive. He has obviously found a way to improve on the MacFarland device using a modified (Al) material. However, he's probably not quite ready to fully disclose pending further tests; maybe like with Jacob suggested, when a load is applied, the result may not be what he was looking for? (purely conjecture on my part).

Well Barbrade, I hope you will just spend a few minutes and draw a pencilled diagram and tell us how your invention works. Please?

cheers
chrisC

[EMdevices]

thanks for the layer description Brnbrade, that helps.Ã,  Ã, 

I started winding but I missed an aluminum layer, so I got to take it apart and fix it.

Darren, he says the trick is in how you start it.Ã,  I thought about this and it could be quite interesting.Ã,  I bet we can do a model of this in PSpice, etc..

EM

[hartiberlin]

Hi Darren,
he posted his schematic over here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2630.msg37778.html#msg37778

He tried to replicate the
MacFarland patent and now used alufoil as an additional layer and seems to have succeeded.

It seems to be the alufoil, that makes the difference.

I guess if we can get a selfrunner this way, it is easy to scale
up to over 50 Watts and I guess this will be a great device for the OverUnity Prize ?!

Stefan, I already saw that. It is just a reiteration of the Cook patent. Am I missing something?

Where are the capacitors, the audio inputs, the battery, the transistor? etc. etc.

That is not a complete or accurate drawing of what he has there.

Darren

Look atthe drawing Earl did.

You just need only a foil capacitor, probably around 100 nF to 1 uF high voltage type
and 2 x 1.5 Volts batteries in series.

The audio input is only another test instead of the DC battery to see, if there is more power to
be coming out of this.

[wattsup]

What Brnbrade is showing here is very very important indeed.

Four variations have been shown thus far.

1) Coils + 3v Battery, DC-DC 58 vdc out.
2) Coils + 3v Battery + Sound (two channel positive only) DC-AC 250V out.
3) Coils + Cap (330 uf 200v) + Cap (62 pf or uf(hard to see) 400v about 4-7v ac out
4) Coils + 4 Caps (hard to see values) about 20v ac out

It's as if he's showing the progression of his own new discoveries as they occur, showing that there is more than one way to skin a cat.

Here's a picture of his meter that I found elsewhere and filled in the AC scale just in case there are other pictures with hard to see readings.

As far as his information goes, there should be more than enough to make a replication. The patent speaks for itself. Even though it is not exactly right, should be good to make tests.

@btenzer

Maybe you could use post #1 to maintan build specs an update as it progresses.