The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Koen1]

Drannom, STFU and get back to your crappy alum pyramids dude

[ltseung888]

FAQ 16. How should the existing Physics textbooks and lessons change?

a. Add the sections on ?Leading Out? of gravitational and electron motion energy.   This section will point out the mistake of unnecessarily digging up oil and coal to pollute the Atmosphere.  It may even mention that the past so-called great inventions such as steam engine, diesel engine, hydroelectric dams etc may not be that great.  There is need to re-examine many existing, established Physics Concepts ? e.g. fluid mechanics, electricity generation, electron motion energy etc.

b. Add the section on Flying Saucer and Inertia Propulsion systems.  This section will point out that the magneto propulsion unit is likely to replace the wheel in the foreseeable future.  The billions and billions of dollars spent on rockets and space research may have been poured in the wrong direction.

c. Discuss the correct application of the Law of Conservation of Energy. Note the word correct.  The emphasis is that the Law of Conservation of Energy itself is correct.  However, scientists in the past did not appreciate the Lead Out energy and did not account for it in the equation. Slide 20 in http://www.energyfromair.com/ioe.talk/ will be reproduced.


d. Rewrite the section on perpetual motion machines to account for lead out energy. Many working inventions such as the ancient Chinese Water Wheel, Bessler Wheel, Joseph Newman Machines, Wang Shum Ho Generator etc will be reproduced and properly explained.

[ltseung888]

Dear All,

I am forwarding a letter from the Chairman of the Institute of Energy (IOE.HK).  The IOE will be holding a Press Conference on Monday, June 16, 2008 at the HKU Space in Admiralty Center to announce its formation.  I shall give an introduction on extracting energy from gravity.  The presentation material will be selected from
http://www.energyfromair.com/ioe_talk/

You are invited to attend this important event.

Lawrence Tseung
******
Dear Friends and Colleagues,

The Institute of Energy (IOE) is formed with the goals in providing an independent focal point and a powerful voice to engage business and industry, government, academia and the public, the IOE promotes the safe, environmentally responsible and efficient supply and use of energy in all its forms and applications. In fulfilling this purpose the IOE addresses the depth and breadth of energy and the energy system, from all known and unknown sources, including upstream and downstream hydrocarbons and other primary fuels and renewables, to power generation, transmission and distribution to sustainable development, demand side management and energy efficiency. Offering learning and networking opportunities to support career development, the IOE will provide a home to all those working in energy, and a scientific and technical reservoir of knowledge for industry.

We shall hold a Press Conference on the coming Monday, 16th June, 2008 at 11:00 AM, at the HKUSPACE at Room UC610, 6th Floor, United Centre, Admiralty. There we shall have a short presentation in ?Introduction of the Institute of Energy and The Gravity Energy Lead-Out Theory and the Perpetual Machines Examples?. I know you are very keen on the latest energy technology development and hope you can come to the Press Conference on this very important public announcement.

With warmest regards,

James Wong
Chairman
Institute of Energy

[chrisC]

Dear All,

I am forwarding a letter from the Chairman of the Institute of Energy (IOE.HK).  The IOE will be holding a Press Conference on Monday, June 16, 2008 at the HKU Space in Admiralty Center to announce its formation.  I shall give an introduction on extracting energy from gravity.....

Lawrence Tseung
******

Maybe if you told James Wong about your thread on this Forum, he would not be too keen to invite you to present? No?

Poor James, he doesn't know you're a wacko!

cheers
chrisC

[Drannom]

Drannom, STFU and get back to your crappy alum pyramids dude

i do not know if The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory is correct or not, i do know that is better to attack a theory with your own ideas, not like a monkee, i have made few posts in this topic to talk about the electrinium, but no one attack that theory like you did in page 9 of Cystal Hutchison topic

Koen1 you had attack Arthur P. Summera theory, he worked 50 years on that, and give us all his knowledges, and you pretend that he his a liar and a non sincere scientist, you better suppose that electrinium is right and test it !

@ all
many attacks are humoristic, but some members exceed the limits, anayway keeping positive energy
while attacking is better