Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 91 Guests are viewing this topic.

chrisC

Quote from: Top Gun on November 07, 2008, 08:32:07 PM
....

The difference between the Chinese Scientists and the people in this forum is that the Chinese Scientists actually performed the experiment and learned to control the parameters.


The only difference between the Chinese Scientist and Lawrence Tseung is that Lawrence Tseung is making speeches for them! Not one scientist has ever come forward in this Forum or anywhere else to verify such findings. Are we living in the dark ages or is Tseung the only enlightened scientist in the world?
Well, people you can draw your own conclusions. A delusional crackpot is still a delutional crackpot. It doesn't matter which way you look at it!

cheers
chrisC

Top Gun

Let me describe experiment003 here:

Assume that the experimenters have mastered experiment002 and produced a device A driven by pulsing DC current that will move horizontally on a smooth surface in the Y direction.

We can add a similar device B except that this device B will move horizontally in the X direction.  For simplicity of understanding, this second device can be put on top of the first device.

By varying the strength of the pulsing DC current to the devices A and B, we can move the resultant device in any direction horizontally.  Instead of using padded surfaces, we can use damper or springs with locking mechanisms (actual setup in China).  See reply 3264 picture clip_image004a.jpg.

Top Gun

I shall now explain experiment004.

This will be done after experiment002.  In experiment002, we would have developed a pulsing DC device that can move an object in the Y direction horizontally.  Now we apply the same principle to produce one or more pulsing DC device that can move an object in the Z direction (vertically).  The object can move vertically up, down or hover in mid-air.

Experiment005 is the combination of Experiment003 and Experiment004 with a computer program for control.  All is packaged in the form of a flying saucer.

The Chinese Engineers achieved that within 6 months.  I am sure that the MIT, Stanford or other top scientists in USA can replicate that.  (If they cannot, President Obama when he resides in the White House can give scholarships to Ms. Forever Yuen and team so that they can produce the flying saucer prototype in USA at one of the selected top universities - as an undergraduate project.)

Devil

Quote from: Top Gun on November 07, 2008, 09:17:23 PM
I shall now explain experiment004.

This will be done after experiment002.  In experiment002, we would have developed a pulsing DC device that can move an object in the Y direction horizontally.  Now we apply the same principle to produce one or more pulsing DC device that can move an object in the Z direction (vertically).  The object can move vertically up, down or hover in mid-air.

Experiment005 is the combination of Experiment003 and Experiment004 with a computer program for control.  All is packaged in the form of a flying saucer.

The Chinese Engineers achieved that within 6 months.  I am sure that the MIT, Stanford or other top scientists in USA can replicate that.  (If they cannot, President Obama when he resides in the White House can give scholarships to Ms. Forever Yuen and team so that they can produce the flying saucer prototype in USA at one of the selected top universities - as an undergraduate project.)


Top Gun, you explained the theory and the design of the flying saucer as if it were a piece of cake.

Do you know that the information has been regarded as top-secret in China, USA and elsewhere?

Now that it is flying in China.  There is no secret any more.  President-Elect Obama may not know the activities in Area 52 as a Senator.  Now he has a right to know.  He will have the right to act after January 20, 2009 when he actually takes over.

If the Form 7 students led by the 17 year old Forever Yuen can build the Flying Saucer prototype, the top scientists in Russian, Japan, Germany, Singapore, etc. should have little problem.  Lee Cheung Kin has provided the photo of the actual flying saucer in China.  I am sure that for the right incentive, he will help an investor to buy the prototype.

He also wrote a letter in Chinese to President-Elect Obama.  He is drafting one to the President of China.  May be the human race will have a future.

Do not worry about the insults and jeers.  Let them recite the following 666 times.

(1) The Lead-out-energy from a horizontally pulled pendulum is equal to the vertical component of the tension times the vertical displacement.
(2) An unbalanced force can be generated from a closed system.  Secondary events using unequal exchanges of energy and momentum are used.
(3) The electromagnetic Coil can be a magnet, a collision mechanism and an electricity exchange mechanism.

atomicX

TinselKoala,
I'm disappointed that video is a mock.  I thought you were one of the good guy.  Sigh..


Utilitarian,
I'll try to interprete the graph with an example.  Suppose the pendulum at rest.  What says is that instead of carry the mass x distance straight upward,  you can achieve the same x distance upward by swing it right or left with less work. 

Top Gun,
I understand the main point of your explaination.  There is no need to go further into each individual case.  I'm happy with 1 case working.  Right now my concern is not how but why is it like that.  Why it takes less work?  I'll have to think about this for a bit.