Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 43 Guests are viewing this topic.

Top Gun

Quote from: atomicX on November 09, 2008, 03:22:37 PM
Top Gun,

My professor once told me, "trust the experiment, don't trust the equations".  I've realized that there's no such thing as a right equation.  You did the experiment and you saw the result with your own eyes.  That's all it matters.  Use it as a thriving force for you belief, a guidance to truth.  I have to give it to you.  You argued with Lee and declared what the world said about inertia propulsion was wrong.  That was bold.  Now you have all that weight on your shoulder.  I have to tell you that people beliefs these days are based on a popularity contest.  Whatever most popular source wins.   

I wish you, ms. Forever Yuen and her team soon achieve phenomena success.  Don't let critics stop you.    As for why the law of momentum did not hold in the experiment, I only have one explanation.  Motion is not a linear function of force. 


Dear AtomicX,

Thank you for your support.  Flying_saucer001 and Experiment001 were both so simple that the answer was obvious.  Tinselkoa said that such experiments have been done thousands of times.  He did not border to repeat.

Your professor once told you, "trust the experiment, don't trust the equations".  I would add â€" “You must find an explanation for your experimental results.  Existing science can be wrong or the scientists may have misinterpreted certain phenomena.  If you have no explanation, you are likely to spend many frustrating years like Newman or Wang.” 

When we have the quick and dirty fireworks rocket in a box experiment, we observed significant movement.  We both saw the result with our own eyes.  Yet Lee and I violently disagreed on the explanation.

Experiment001 is so simple that it can be repeated in secondary schools worldwide.  Some forum member here will just jeer and hurl insults.  Many will do the experiments but keep the result to themselves as many are funded or associated with Governments.  They realize its military or commercial significance.  Experiment002 to Experiment005 are just enhancements to Experiment001.

Once Lee Cheung Kin added the Appendix to the Open Letter to President-Elect Obama, there is no secret to the flying saucer any more. The flying saucers have been spotted and photographed for decades.  The top-secret researchers in USA, China and elsewhere must have known and understood the theory.  The secret is now presented via Tseung and Lee for the benefit of the world.

critic

Dear Top Gun,

Please correct me if I were wrong.

Experiment002 is effectively getting back to the initial position of Experiment001 via magnetoc or electormgnetic means.  There is no net resultant force produced at this stage.

atomicX

Quote from: chrisC on November 09, 2008, 03:51:30 PM
@AtomicX

Based on your writing style and also not having much gray matter, you must be related to Tseung or one of Tseung's altered egos to try prop up this dying thread?

You need to learn something from the late Professor Randy Pausch, Computer Science professor at Carnegie Mellon University when he knew he was dying from cancer and was asked what he would say to the world if he was only allowed 3 words. He said, "Tell the truth". And when asked a 2nd question, "What if you were afforded 3 more words?". He said, "All the time".

Well, old Tseung has never been able to tell the truth and if you're old Tseung's altered ego, I wouldn't expect you to know how to do it either. But the you could be one of his commie friends, then of course, we can't expect commies to tell the truth either!

It's not so much about convincing people or being popular. It's about being to verify one's own postulates and have others confirm it. So far, only the old snake oil salesman and his supposedly very intelliegent Chinese professors and friends are able to back him up? Talking about friends that backed him up.... I have not even seen one who vouched for him independently on this Forum. Have you?

cheers
chrisC


ChrisC,
I have to apologize to you.  I thought you are just a complete A#@, but I was wrong.  Well... I'm not totally wrong but I'm still wrong.

I don't need to learn that lesson of Prof Randy Pausch.  On the contrary, you need to learn the lesson of the story "cry wolf"'.  You're so confused with which is which.  Just relax, chill, take it easy, deep breath... and think. 

You're speculating this thread got something to do with communist.  It might be, who knows.  I just know that I'm interested in the theory period.  Unfortunately, that implies that I'm a commie.   

So far how did you verify this is right or wrong?  I believe in this theory, but I am aware that I might be wrong.  The different of taking both possibility as awareness is important and i don't think you have any.  Talking about friends that back him up?  Well excuse me, if you needs to see alot of people backing him up to believe it, then you're just a victim of the popularity contest yourself.  It doesn't matter if no one or all support him, I support him.

chrisC

Quote from: atomicX on November 09, 2008, 08:05:01 PM
...
It doesn't matter if no one or all support him, I support him.

Well, well, well. I'm really happy that Tseung has at least one dorky friend. Congratulations to both of you. I just hope you won't forget to take your medication.

cheers
chrisC


Top Gun

Quote from: critic on November 09, 2008, 07:28:08 PM
Dear Top Gun,

Please correct me if I were wrong.

Experiment002 is effectively getting back to the initial position of Experiment001 via magnetoc or electormgnetic means.  There is no net resultant force produced at this stage.

Dear critic,

Correct.  Instead of a one-time impact force on the container, Experiment002 in combination with Experiment001 will produce a pulsing force.  The frequency of this pulsing force will depend on the actual experimental set up.

If we have a few of these Experiment001+Experiment002 devices placed vertically, we will be able to produce a more-or-less constant force upwards to balance the weight of the container and its contents.

The vertical placement is effectively experiment004 - which was initially treated as a challenge to the World.  However, the Form 7 students head by Ms. Forever Yuen solved it within an hour.  To them, it was no challenge at all.

The Chinese scientist known to Lee Cheung Kin not only understood the theory but also built a working prototype within 6 months.  That is why Lee is so convinced that he shared his excitement with President-Elect Obama and the world.