The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[hansvonlieven]

OK Top Gun,

Assuming I buy your calculation, how do you propose to harvest the 50% overunity, feed some 2% back into the system to keep it going and then drive something with the balance?

Please supply a concept diagram of a machine that can do this.

Hans von Lieven

As I said in this earlier post of mine. Forget about maths. Just give us a concept drawing of how you intend to harvest and use the surplus lead out energy. We will do the rest.

We will build it (I am sure we can find someone somewhere who can use a drill), show it to the world, and validate the Lee-Tseung theory of hobgoblins and tooth fairies.

Furthermore we will, upon successful completion, lobby strongly for a Nobel Prize for those two outstanding pioneering physicists that have saved the world.

Fair enough? Let's see the drawing.

Hans von Lieven

[Pirate88179]

@ Hans:

Please do not forget the research and hard work of Professor Whoflungdung.  If there is a Nobel prize for this, he should be included.

Bill

[ltseung888]

Dear All,

Please see the two videos produced by Mr. Tong Pochi in Hong Kong.
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=SA5ObshvNx0
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=-TfwKBdmRao

and the following pictures:
   

There are three basic components:
(1)   Battery supply pack
(2)   Timer Control unit
(3)   The Experiment001 device with an electromagnet in the middle and two permanent magnets in two copper (non-magnetic) tubes.

The purpose of the experiment is to check out the Lee-Tseung theory of using unbalanced forces generated from within for the purpose of propulsion.  More experiments may be needed but the two above videos and pictures do demonstrate the possible correctness of the theory.

Lee Cheung Kin and his Chinese Military friends have produced a working, hovering prototype.  However, there may be difficulty in demonstrating that openly to the World.  Details in: http://hk.gecocities.com/winghang20022002/Flying_Saucer.htm (You need to use Internet Explorer to view it.)

Lawrence Tseung
Director, Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[TinselKoala]

Please note that this is EXACTLY as I predicted:

The device was not shown to hover--because it cannot.

The device was not shown to make progress on a proper frictionless surface--because it cannot.

The device was not shown to maintain a sideways displacement when suspended as a pendulum--because it cannot.

The device WAS shown to inch along on a table top, and no control experiments were done (or shown)---exactly in accord with friction and Newtonian kinematics.

"Lee Cheung Kin and his Chinese Military friends have produced a working, hovering prototype. " If that statement refers to a device that hovers and is propelled by the above device or a variant thereof, it is a baldfaced lie.

PROVE ME WRONG!!

So far, you have just proven me right, over and over....

[ltseung888]

Please note that this is EXACTLY as I predicted:

Please reproduce Experiment001.  Mr. Tong Po Chi in Hong Kong has done it.  Do you need help to repeat the experiment?

Some people now suspect you as one of those in a Blue Suit - trying to persuade the scientists not to develop the Flying Saucer.

I predict
(a) The "jumping" of the cylinder will be much higher with improvement.
(b) The pulse force or unbalanced force will be much larger with improvement.
(c) The pulse force upwards can be made to be steady with multiple cylinders.
(d) The steady force can be made greater than the weight of the device.  If the upward force can be greater than the weight, Newton's Laws say that the device will move upwards.
(e) Other devices using rotation, flux changes etc. will demonstrate that unbalanced forces can be produced from within.

There is no evidence to show that Lee Cheung Kin and team could not produce a hovering prototype so far.  They had 6 months and very significant resources.

Mr. Tong did the above part-time with zero outside financing and no helpers.