The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Kul_ash]

Lol 

The main thing thats bugging me is his so called "calm water, good sunshine"  example!

Simply if I do not know how to use Solar energy, my systems "is" with out solar power. The boat is not going to move. If I know how to use it then I need to add instrumentation to gather it and then my system "is" with solar energy. But what I am gathering from his example that Sun "decideds" to give his energy without any thing and pushes the boat  Ok even this happens I will accept is cause I have seen something strange happening and then I will work out the solution. But here in this case there is not even a "single demonstration" that something strange is happening and I need to look in to it! lol.
It is like saying, I have contacts with Sun and he will mysteriously add his energy to boat and move it according to my theory! Lol. When you will ask me to show it working, I will just tell you how great Sun is and how cool I am to know what Sun is doing, thats it! ha ha ha

Dear Sir

I am extreamly lost in understanding your term "Leading out" free energy! I saw your presentation. In your slide no. 6, you have mentioned that after applying a pulse force, resultant force = Tension in string but in opposite direction. Perfectly ok! But now in your next slide, you are claming some thing called as "Lead Energy" which has come freely to your system! What is a relation of slide no. 6 to slide no. 7? If I believe in slide no.7 then slide no. 6 is automatically wrong becasue T1 will not be equal to resulting force which can be calculated from parallelogram theorm. You have not given any mathematical proof as to where this energy is coming from except the term lead out!
If I have to believe your theory, then a pendulum clock which gets a pulse force will never ever stop working if you convert that additional "lead out" energy to rewind the spring! I can understand that horizontal force will increasing force in string but your claim that it will "lead out" gravitational energy has no proof! I am sorry to say this but this is something out of my imagination unless n untill I see the real mathematical analysis. You slide no. 6 and 7 are totally contradicting.

Great post Kul_ash!

Thats really a touchy post! But for me to prove Newton wrong, this is not going to help !  Simple explanation I want to give you is: If as per your claim, universe really add some energy to pendulum and if it is not extacted, it will remain in system and will go on increasing it continuously. The swing system will go out of balance and evantually it will tear off the support from where its hanging! I have never seen that in any child's swing in a park. Parents keep on giving "pulse force" to swing but it never really goes out of balance! This simple experiment you can do in any park and see it for yourself! Or you want to say the way "lead out" energy comes in system, there is another way of universe to take it off if you do not use it? 

And even better!

We've been trying to get Tseung to understand that his theory does not appear to be correct,
but instead of actually discussing it properly he always keeps trying to deflect the discussion.

Great to have another sound thinker in here who also sees through the huge holes in Tseungs "theory".


... hey, but maybe Tseung has simply never used a swing when he was a kid eh?

[ltseung888]

Dear Sir

I am extremely lost in understanding your term "Leading out" free energy! I saw your presentation. In your slide no. 6, you have mentioned that after applying a pulse force, resultant force = Tension in string but in opposite direction. Perfectly ok! But now in your next slide, you are claming some thing called as "Lead Energy" which has come freely to your system! What is a relation of slide no. 6 to slide no. 7? If I believe in slide no.7 then slide no. 6 is automatically wrong becasue T1 will not be equal to resulting force which can be calculated from parallelogram theorm. You have not given any mathematical proof as to where this energy is coming from except the term lead out!   

Dear Kul_ash.

I saw your profile and realized that you only registered on the Forum today.  There are over 2000 posts in this thread and the chance of your digesting all this information within a couple of hours is nil.

For one thing, I would like you to use the latest presentation file available in:
http://rapidshare.com/files/107462223/New_Energy_V8.PPT.html

You may be using one of the earlier files that jumped a few mathematical steps.  Please read this latest presentation file ?New Energy V8.ppt? so that we would be discussing the same thing.

Post again after you have carefully studied the information.  Please read also the notes portion of the presentation slides.

[chrisC]

Obviously it will not do to have "Top Gun" present Tseungs claimed theory.
|f mr Tseung is to be taken seriously, he should present his own case.
.....
Why would Top Gun want to hold Tseungs presentation unless he is Tseung?
Doesn't make much sense...
....

A lot of stuff doesn't make sense if Tseung forgets or purposely does not take his psychotic medication!

cheers
chrisC

[Koen1]

Dear Kul_ash.

I saw your profile and realized that you only registered on the Forum today.  There are over 2000 posts in this thread and the chance of your digesting all this information within a couple of hours is nil.

The chance of getting any more usefull information from reading all those 2000 posts is even smaller. No need to. You just keep repeating yourself.
And more than half of the posts are yours, priding yourself on your own theory and structurally ignoring peoples valid objections.
So far, I have seen Kul_ash post more sensible stuff in the single day that he is a member than I have seen you post in total, "mr Tseung".

You may be using one of the earlier files that jumped a few mathematical steps.  Please read this latest presentation file ?New Energy V8.ppt? so that we would be discussing the same thing.

That seems quite contradictory... So first you tell Kul_ash to go and read all theprevious posts before he is allowed to react to your nonsense,
and then you tell him that a lot of the previous posts contain incorrect info because of your tendency to "jump a few mathematical steps" (for the
sane readers: "make unfounded assumptions and incorrect use of standard formulae"), so now all of a sudden you tell him he must go and download
your very latest version of your slideshow?
Make up your mind, man!
Either he can just take a quick look and use the brain he has already shown to be able to use much more succesfull than you have so far,
and comment on the evidently flawed reasoning on your part,
or he must read all 2000 posts of nonsense.
Not both, and certainly not with that silly reason for it. He has made valid points, and you "Tseung", are once again trying
to avoid giving him a proper answer. As always. I bet you'll log on as Top Gun or whoever and start to support your own
argument in a minute, and then post two pages of bullshit about your fantasy escapades in China, hoping that we are all
too stupid to see that you're just playing tricks to try to distract us and avoid having to give a proper answer. As always.

Post again after you have carefully studied the information. 

No.
I've really had it with you, "Tseung"! 
It's always the same with you.
People ask you a question, making a very good point, indicating that your theory doesn't hold water,
and instead of answering them you start implying they have not read enough of your nonsense, or even
that they are not educated enough. That is not a valid reaction. Stop that!
Answer the damn question!
It is not a difficult question, and Kul_ash has made a good point.
If your theory is valid and proper, you should be able to answer the man!
Refusal to, or more evasive action, will only serve to show your ineptitude.

[Pirate88179]

***Duplicate Post***

%/.Error code 49%/.