The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Top Gun]

Thirdly, in your pendulum 14. jpg analysis, it is clear that supplied work is much larger than output work. Where is the amount of work done by lead out energy? You have not shown that horizontal work done is 16 joules and vertical work done is 7 joules so total 23 joules of output work as compared to 16 joules of input work. And You have calculated input work without considering leverage arm length. How is it correct?

Please explain!

Dear Kul_ash,

I shall go for the full mathematics and physics explanation.

(1)   There is the concept of negative work in mechanics in physics.  This is the situation when the direction of force and direction of displacement are opposite.  Energy is either stored in the system or changed into other forms such as heat etc.

(2)   When we have three forces such as in Pendulum08.jpg, we need to examine the three forces separately.  We need to consider the vertical and horizontal components of each force and of each displacement.  We need to examine whether positive or negative work has been done.

(3)   Let us consider the weight Mg first.  It only has a vertical component.  Its horizontal component is zero.  The vertical displacement is opposite to direction of force.  Thus Mg = 60*9.8 Newtons, dH =L(1-cos(a))=0.013599 meters, and the negative work done is = - 7.996455 joules.  (Note that this is negative work.)

(4)   Let us consider the external horizontal force F next.  It only has a horizontal component.  The vertical component is zero.  The horizontal displacement dx is in the same direction of the force.  Thus F = 10 *9.8 Newtons, dx=Lsin(a)=0.16436 meters.  The positive work done = 16.0718 joules

(5)   Let us consider the tension of the string T1.  T1= 60.83 Newtons.  The vertical component of T1 = T1cos(a) = 60*9.8 Newtons, dH=0.013599 meter.  The positive work done = 7.996455 joules.  Note that this is exactly equal and opposite to the work done by the weight.

(6)   Let us continue to consider the tension of the string T1. T1= 60.83 Newtons.  The vertical component of T1 = T1sin(a) = 10*9.8 Newtons, dX=0.16436 meters.  The direction of the force and the direction of displacement are opposite.  Thus the work done is negative.  The value = -16.0718 joules.  Note that this equal and opposite to the external work done by F.

Thus the full analysis of the three forces gives us:

(a)   The externally supplied work done by the horizontal force F = 16.0718 joules.  It did not do any vertical work.

(b)   The tension of the string does vertical work = 7.996455 joules.  It also does negative horizontal work = -16.0718 joules.  This negative work is stored as additional ?tension? energy in the pendulum system.

(c)   The weight does negative vertical work equal to  = -7.996455 joules.  This negative work is stored as increased potential energy of the bob in the pendulum system.

Thus the total energy of the pendulum system = 16.0718 + 7.996455 = 24.10364 joules.  The external horizontal energy supplied is only 16.0718 joules.  The additional 7.996455 joules must come from gravity via the string.  The Lee-Tseung theory uses the term Lead Out to describe this process (additional 7.996455 joules).

I hope that this analysis is now clear.  Please follow the mathematics carefully.  Do double checks and even triple checks.  Make sure you can follow the analysis.  No Laws of physics or mathematics have been violated.

If needed, I do not mind doing the tangential pull (Ideal Lee-Tseung Pull) analysis later.

[ltseung888]

The priest said: "You already have the knowledge.  Preach love."

We must instill love in the hearts of the forum members, the people we email to, the World Leaders, the Maker and Shakers, the deprived and the general public.

[chrisC]

The priest said: "You already have the knowledge.  Preach love."

We must instill love in the hearts of the forum members, the people we email to, the World Leaders, the Maker and Shakers, the deprived and the general public.

Old Tseung:

Don't worry about the Love issue. First, just concentrate on improving your Physics and then your Math.

Oh, don't forget the virtues of speaking the truth, being honest, representing yourself and not pretending to be other persona, telling the truth that no academia agrees with your theory anywhere, not even in tiny Hong Kong and that the patent office (anywhere) has not granted you a patent on your so called Lee-Tseung theory crap.

If you can really speak the truth and not twist other people's words, then you will begin to gain some respect and then perhaps forum members might change their opinion of you! But that is not to say your Physics and Math. are OK though. For those you need more tuition in 'O' Level coursework.

cheers
chrisC

[ltseung888]

The Sunday Sermon was interesting.  It was teaching the Christians on the eating of meat sacrificed to the Pagan gods.  The preacher made the following points:

(1)   There is only one God, the scarifying ceremony to Pagan gods is meaningless.  It would not make the meat better or worst.

(2)   God has given every one of us a conscience.  However, your conscience and my conscience may not be the same.  I may view that a man with no wife having  adult relationship with a prostitute is normal and is acceptable. Another person may view that as a sin. 

(3)   So it is quite all right to eat meat sacrificed to Pagan gods if your conscience allows it.  It would not make you better or worse.

(4)   However, one has to set an example for others.  If the eating of that meat were equated by society as equivalent of adoring the Pagan God, a Christian should not eat that meat.

(5) So having  with adult relationship with a prostitute is not a sin.  Just do not make it an example to tempt others.  Just go to a Country (or Las Vegas) where that is regarded as a normal and legal activity.

It was something new for me.  As Chinese, we traditionally offer our meals to our ancestors in the many festivities before we eat.  Some Chinese Christians regard that as a sin.  So some automatically accepted customs by some may be viewed as sins by others.

This gives a good teaching to ?Great truths begin as Blasphemies?! It is no surprise that a perfectly simple Slide 3 which obeys all the mathematics or physics laws is regarded as Blasphemies by some.

In this World, we have to accept different points of view - even in science!!!
The Earth may be round.  But if forcing that fact on others could ruin their careers, refraining may be the right move.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Quaintly stated and undeniably true.

However, before I 'take the plunge' so to speak...what if you know the 'lady' wouldn't be selling her virtue unless she had to ?

Slightly perplexed.

Regards...