TPU - General Discussion

[Grumpy]

Well, if the source of energy has a certain direction or polarity, then flipping the device would make it "pump" the wrong direction.  A sensor for this "polarity" would permit the connections to be reversed and flipping would no longer be a problem.

Now about SM's statement on finding the "circuit potential"...huge clue if we can figure it out.

[z_p_e]

Those that subscribe to the notion that a magnetic vortex is one major aspect of the device's operation, know that gravity does not come into play here.

@Grumpy: Conceptually yes; good points.

Tesla provides the answers to both points, and EM has touched on the second point a couple of times.

[turbo]

well, i have already seen it in one of my last experiments.
actually it was a couple of hours ago i noticed it. 
from here my bet is on gravity.

M.

[BEP]

In the old days, when tuning a parallel resonant line you could connect two solid wires to a light bulb and slide it from one end of the line to the other. The light would go dark and bright depending upon what part of the wave you were tapping.

You could also decide on the point you wanted - fix the light there - and adjust frequency until the light showed it was on a node or anti-node. I see no reason the same can't be done on a TPU.

IMO - gravity does play a part and so does a vortex. Gravity - as much as it does with a spinning top.

Spin rotation and precession direction must be correct for any similar device so a TPU must be helically polarized. The UP and DOWN vortices would be opposite rotation so of couse, turning it upside down would kill it. The vertical E field South and North would be reverse so it probably had to be turned upside to work down-under. That is if it was one of the types that had equal construction top and bottom.
------------

On a side note: I'm finding the fastest possible pulse obtainable is from the flyback of a coil. The problem there is the charge pulse zero's the effect. The solutions to the zeroing?
1. DC bias applied to the that coil or bettter yet to a secondary of that coil to keep the energy on one side of zero.
2. Just the right size, strength and placement of a magnet to do the same (on a secondary).

The result isn't seen when scoping the primary. I'm not shorting the BEMF. I'm making use of it as it seems to be the cleanest of all pulses. (I'll risk using the term BEMF because I know those who could answer the question here easily know what I mean).

Does anyone has a better solution?

[Earl]

I don't agree.  A bathtub water vortex on planet Earth only exists because gravity exists.  It doesn't happen in space.
It only happens if Earth rotates.  The rotation of Earth is necessary to catalyze a water vortex.

Gravity exists most likely because Earth's mass causes aether to push objects to the surface.
So the aether that is pushing us to the surface can be tricked into turning and spiraling and thereby forming an aether vortex.
Turn the device upside down and it stops working, unless you reverse direction of the magnetic vortex.
It is possible that the magnetic vortex entrains the much more significant aether vortex, but that it is still necessary to act as a catalyzer.  It could be that a magnetic vortex "entangles" an aether vortex.

Those that subscribe to the notion that a magnetic vortex is one major aspect of the device's operation, know that gravity does not come into play here.
[snip]