SMOT! - (previously about the OC MPMM)

[g4macdad]

@omnibus,

i beg to differ!Ã,  you have have shown a bunch of hypothetical bs that is nothing more than a dream algebraic want to be equation that does'nt add up.Ã,  SHOW ME THE NUMBERS!Ã,  WHAT PART OF THAT IS SO HARD FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND/Ã,  I DON'T CARE IF YOU EXPLAIN IT I RODIN MATH!!!!Ã,  YOU JUST ARE NOT GETTING THE FACT THAT YOU CAN NOT EXPLAIN THIS WITH REAL MATH!Ã,  BECAUSE WHAT YOU PROPOSE DOESN'T EXIST, IN REAL MATH!!!Ã,  Ã, SO TRY A DIFFERENT TACK.

lol
sam,


ps:Ã,  you can't drive straight into the wind when sailing either.

Math cannot prove anything. If you cannot grasp the concept, the equation will be meaningless to you. If you don't want to understand Omnibus' theory, no one can force you to. Why don't you stop shouting as one in the wind, and do something meaningful?

[supersam]

@g4,

i would really like to.  but based on what?  the facts as omnibus see's them?  and exactly what are those facts?  an equation that he has pulled out of his ass!  surely you must be kidding?  or do you really believe that he is on to something.  maybe you should spend your time developing, the right engineering principles to make this work, good luck!!!! no else has been able to so far because no one has been able to produce any quantatative data to support omnibus's fucked up argument to begin with!  all i have asked for, to get lambasted by omni is, please just give me one variable and then we will go from there.  but, no, instead i am the dweeb, that doesn't understand a simple concept like the "violation of the coeffiecient of energy". right maybe i am the dweeb, but at least i am not spouting the violation of, coe, at the top of my lungs with no better proof than,  because i say so,  you dumbasses don't even deserve any real numbers.  what a bunch of schmucks to even ask for real numbers?  can';t you see that it is obvious!  havn't i allready told you it is obvious.  how dare you question me!!!

lol
sam

[Koen1]

@g4: you misunderstand. It is not that we do not want to understand Omnibus's "theory", we do understand what it is he keeps saying.
It's just that we want to see actual measurement data and actual empirical proof that what he describes will happen according to his "theory" is truly what happens in reality.
So far all Omnibus does is just repeat his calculations over and over again, and call anyone who doesn't submit to his holy vision an idiot, but one thing he has not done is the simple fact of proving his assumptions correct by showing us this closed loop, continually rolling SMOT, which according to his math should be a piece of cake will all the OU going on in his SMOT.
So far the only excess energy seems to be in Omnibus himself and his fingers, who seem to be able to type indefinitely without ever getting tired.
But proving his right by simply filming his eternally rolling SMOT is beyond his capabilities, apparently...
... could it be that he doesn't have a continuous SMOT at all, that all he has is his calculations, and that there is zero empirical proof?
That would explain his behaviour...

[g4macdad]

@g4,

i would really like to.Ã,  but based on what?Ã,  the facts as omnibus see's them?Ã,  and exactly what are those facts?Ã,  an equation that he has pulled out of his ass!Ã,  surely you must be kidding?Ã,  or do you really believe that he is on to something.Ã,  maybe you should spend your time developing, the right engineering principles to make this work, good luck!!!! no else has been able to so far because no one has been able to produce any quantatative data to support omnibus's fucked up argument to begin with!Ã,  all i have asked for, to get lambasted by omni is, please just give me one variable and then we will go from there.Ã,  but, no, instead i am the dweeb, that doesn't understand a simple concept like the "violation of the coeffiecient of energy". right maybe i am the dweeb, but at least i am not spouting the violation of, coe, at the top of my lungs with no better proof than,Ã,  because i say so,Ã,  you dumbasses don't even deserve any real numbers.Ã,  what a bunch of schmucks to even ask for real numbers?Ã,  can';t you see that it is obvious!Ã,  havn't i allready told you it is obvious.Ã,  how dare you question me!!!

lol
sam

If what Omnibus is saying is so stupid and unworthy of consideration. What are you doing here? Why all the expletives? To me, you appear as a much greater schmuck. Buh-Bye!

[RunningBare]

ps:  you can't drive straight into the wind when sailing either.

oops, someone should tell these guys http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRYkIzjmCR4&NR=1