Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



I HAVE ACHIEVED OVERUNITY

Started by noblefuse, December 11, 2007, 10:15:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

IronHead

These two different and district technologies can not be compared.
Noblefuse's  system is based on magnetic resonance cold fusion reaction not plasma, the plasma electric field is only a carrier and means of high resonate magnetic field production.
Eric Lerner's system is based on highly compressed concentrated plasmoid fusion. 

Then there are the hot fusion guys trying to build lasers to produce the billions of degrees it takes to fuse.
They say none of this below temp stuff can be done. No one knows who is right until they open there minds to do the experiments.


To everyone following the way of Dogma
I do not see Noblefuse as a con or fraud as he is asking you for nothing, no money, nothing  only that someone replicate what he has stumbled on that has the means to build this thing. You should all be happy that he is sharing his findings and asking others to replicate as appose to hiding his findings.You people bitch no matter what someone seems to find ,share,hide or just talk about in general. You bitch about your dogma and compare this guys works to that guys works making judgments on who is right and who is wrong. Though you have no projects of any kind having to do with such bitch on your bench. Go build something so you can be flamed on how it cant possibly work!  All of you go build something and be part of the solution not the problem.

Just build it, it will teach you
IronHead

Charlie_V

When I have developed my over unity device, I will then begin construction on a death ray for it to power.  Once the death ray is complete, I will use it to destroy most of human kind, ending wars, pollution, poverty, and hunger. 

So who wants some cookies?

AhuraMazda

Quote from: Charlie_V on February 14, 2008, 09:50:02 PM
When I have developed my over unity device, I will then begin construction on a death ray for it to power.  Once the death ray is complete, I will use it to destroy most of human kind, ending wars, pollution, poverty, and hunger. 

So, you've reach enlightenment?

tinu

I was not referring to the technology involved but to the phenomenology.
The treatment in pdf given at http://noblefuse.com/nfg6.pdf contains some new ideas which are welcome and may have merits (although I prefer not to comment on them at this time) but unfortunately when speaking about its applicability on power generation it falls short from the very beginning because it is done in a very simplistic (I?m in favor of simplicity, where possible, but this is unrealistic) approach. It would be too much to write on it but, just as a start, one can see that plasma is considered collisionless, which is not the case. Thus, equation 4 and subsequent rationale can not be applied. Instead, collision frequency (and mean free path etc.) should be considered but apparently this approach was totally disregarded/ignored.

There are a myriad of other phenomena that are also not even considered. Plasma is notoriously difficult to be modeled. For anyone interested, some good fundamentals can be found at http://www.plasmaphysics.org.uk/ that will make my point clear in case it wasn?t enough.

Skipping the core of the nfg6.pdf paper for now on the above grounds, let?s get to the end of it where one finds out that a ?machine with following characteristics? will be needed:
Voltage: 256 million volts
Frequency: 1.420 GHz
Neither one of the two parameters is properly deduced (the characteristics are given more like guesstimates) nor the machine is well defined (i.e. at what power?! frequency stability etc. etc.) but let that alone, I?d doubt there is a single commercial manufacturer able to producing it as requested. (But even if it was, I expect one will have by the end mainly a very expensive x-ray machine.)

All in all, I am probably advocating for seeing some experimental evidences. I guess I?m just too tired of seeing nothing but high-hope smoke based on dogmas and/or counter-dogmas. Anyway, if the issues I raised are more dogmatic that I?ve read, I?ll leave the forum.

Cheers,
Tinu

IronHead

Now that was well said and referenced. Much better then puking up a one hour video from some other set of parameters without explanation.