"Self Running 900 Watt Fuelless Electrical Generator" Is this new?

[nightlife]

one, no, but a vibration had to have started it.

As far as the universe being all energy, I cant agree or disagree but as long as there are vibrations, there is energy and if there isn't vibrations, then there can not be energy.

Energy being a vibration makes a whole lot more sense then it being electrons.

[tao]

For those wanting that 1 hour audio interview of Thrapp in a more portable format...

Here it is encoded into mp3 format: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=1YTDLGAQ

Its about 25mb, 60 min 8 secs @ 22Khz/96kbps

peace............

[Pirate88179]

@ nightlife:

I am sticking with reality and what HAS been proven.  Your vibration theory, while interesting, has NOT been proven and that is reality.  If you are claiming that Einstein, Oppenheimer, etc. are wrong and you are right, well, I don't buy it.

I listened to the Thrapp interview weeks ago and I have posted that his Stubblefield info was incorrect in some areas.  After a little more research, and what others have posted since, I am still convinced this guy is nothing more than a con man...yes, another one.  That is my opinion.  I decline to give him a donation.

As for overunity being impossible, just ask Stefan and Omnibus about the SMOT.  They will both tell you that it has been proven beyond a doubt to be o.u. (I am not 100% sold on that one but they both are)

Bill

[nightlife]

Pirate88179, there is still to this day, no proof of a electrons existence. there has been said to be traces of one but those traces could as well be traces of a vibration. It is proven that vibrations can flow thru solid objects but it has yet to be proven that one solid object can flow thru another.

As for Thrapp, I too am skeptical about some of the things he has said and I thought I would post it to see what you all on the earth battery thread thought about it. I didn't realize that you all already had talked about it. I must have missed it or over looked it already.

As for the SMOT, I have yet to see one to prove there to be an over unity. I do a lot of research and view a lot of different energy devices. A few have interested me enough to actually think they may work but I found that they actually do not as they are said to work.

I only have I hope left thus far and I am being very careful designing and building it so that I utilize every possible energy with in the design. It is a pulse motor.
I do have one that I hope to experiment with on Thursday and that is the energy from fragrances. I don?t have much faith in it but it still has me curious enough to experiment with it.

[Bulbz]

Pirate88179, there is still to this day, no proof of a electrons existence. there has been said to be traces of one but those traces could as well be traces of a vibration. It is proven that vibrations can flow thru solid objects but it has yet to be proven that one solid object can flow thru another.

As for Thrapp, I too am skeptical about some of the things he has said and I thought I would post it to see what you all on the earth battery thread thought about it. I didn't realize that you all already had talked about it. I must have missed it or over looked it already.

As for the SMOT, I have yet to see one to prove there to be an over unity. I do a lot of research and view a lot of different energy devices. A few have interested me enough to actually think they may work but I found that they actually do not as they are said to work.

I only have I hope left thus far and I am being very careful designing and building it so that I utilize every possible energy with in the design. It is a pulse motor.
I do have one that I hope to experiment with on Thursday and that is the energy from fragrances. I don?t have much faith in it but it still has me curious enough to experiment with it.

If there is (as you say) "no proof of an electrons existence", how does one explain HHO or Browns-Gas ?. Aren't these produced by applying a voltage, that is said to pull on positive and negative electrons ?.