Easier to build and understand than Marks' TPU

[EMdevices]

I believe as electrons, in the copper of the collector winding, leave their atomic orbitals and join the crowd running around the tpu, they leave behind an atomic structure with a net positive charge.Ã,  In other words the copper in the collector winding becomes ionized.Ã,  This positive charge I believe is due to the gravity of the neucleus.

Stop dreaming man and make a resolution for 2008 to take a freaking class in electrodyanamic physics.Ã,  LOL

sparks, on your website you have the toroidal power unit illustration,Ã,  what do you base that on?Ã,  did you read what SM had to say about his device?Ã,  It's in the Master of Magnetic thread at top.Ã,  You will find he has a different explanation more along the line of "different frequencies combine" to produce a "huge kick" and he talk's about collector and control coils, I don't see any control coils in your illustration.

EM

[sparks]

@EM

     I can say for sure that the electrons in the windings under the influence of the kicker coils are moving.  They are going so fast that their inertia can be felt in the tpu.
SM makes a point of referring to the gyroscopic effect of the tpu.  This current is not your typical electron jump from atom to atom.  The tpu doesn't manufacture electrons either.  So where did they come from.  I would guess the copper of the winding.  What's that leave you. Positively charged atomic neuclei.  The whole winding becomes a positively charged collector cylinder. 

[EMdevices]

Hi sparks,  don't take my messages to seriously it's New Years 

but..

gyroscopic effect is due to VIBRATION

Collector wire does not charge up with a net charge , if that's what your trying to say.

SM uses the concepts of magnetic induction in the videos.   It's not some sort of electrostatic charging up of the collector, like some Van D'Graff generator, which is what I think you're trying to say, but I might be wrong.

EM

[Freezer]

It has nothing to do with file size and download speed; JPG introduces noise into
a graphics image, which is not seen in photos, but messes up technical drawings.
The poor image quality leaps right off the screen.

It is also of matter of doing things correctly and incorrectly.  There is no more time or effort needed to save in GIF, so why not do it correctly?

Earl

@Earl

With an image that small it really doesn't make a difference unless you are downloading at 1 bit a second...
A

jpg, and gif are both compression formats.  Gif will have better results on images with low amount of colors and gradations, so it would be good for schematics as you suggest.  Jpg will be better for high color, gradation images, like photographs.  Jpg can be totally adjusted in photoshop and be lossless, such as a tif.

[TheOne]

You can also use PNG format, this format is the best of all, compress all images format without removing quality, but the file size are a little bigger then JPG but without any lost in quality.

It has nothing to do with file size and download speed; JPG introduces noise into
a graphics image, which is not seen in photos, but messes up technical drawings.
The poor image quality leaps right off the screen.

It is also of matter of doing things correctly and incorrectly.  There is no more time or effort needed to save in GIF, so why not do it correctly?

Earl

@Earl

With an image that small it really doesn't make a difference unless you are downloading at 1 bit a second...
A

jpg, and gif are both compression formats.  Gif will have better results on images with low amount of colors and gradations, so it would be good for schematics as you suggest.  Jpg will be better for high color, gradation images, like photographs.  Jpg can be totally adjusted in photoshop and be lossless, such as a tif.