Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



free to air energy

Started by samzoelisa, February 24, 2008, 02:08:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

zerotensor

@nightlife:
What comes to mind here is a recollection of one theory of the operation of SM's tpu, namely, that the iron core wire vibrates within another system of coils, all of which are connected by some circuitry.  Somehow, (assuming no skulduggery), a substantial excess energy is entrained by the system.  An interesting analogy, anyway, and best of luck to you on this line of work...

Some things that have me concerned with your model:

1.  The long magnet and short coil:  the coil will respond to a changing magnetic flux, however, the flux in the magnet is contained almost entirely within its bulk.  Since nearly all of the magnetic flux emanates from the poles of the magnet, very little current would have to flow in the short voice coil to accommodate the small change in flux through the coil as it moves.

2.  "regular" dynamos/motors are characterized by the movment of coils and magnets in relation to one another.  Anyone who has pedaled a bicycle equipped with an old-fashioned headlight dynamo knows that when the light is switched on, the dynamo gets a LOT harder to turn.  In your setup, we have a dynamo, of sorts, except that it is inductively coupled to the load, with the coupling taking place at the same location as the generation.  Now exactly how does this twist lead to the "answer to overunity and free power", as you proclaim?

hartiberlin

@nightlife,

did you yet build it ?

If you draw current from the outer coil
you will have again Lenz law dragging the
magnet?s motion down,
so do you really have more energy out than energy put in
via the inner coil?s pulse ?

Many thanks.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

nightlife

zerotensor and hartiberlin, hang in there, I will have video footage soon. I made a couple changes that make a unbelievable difference. It is going to take me a couple more days and it may not be till this weekend before I am done. You all will be very happy with the results.

I do have a couple questions though.

How long do relays last? 

Does anyone have a link for a good 12 volt battery source?

I was told that a new battery has been created that holds ten times the charge and last up to 10 times longer then the average car battery. Has anyone else heard of this battery and if so, do you have a link to their site?

harlfishing

They said the world was flat, humans will never fly, and the moon is made out of cheese.  Don't tell Nightlife it won't work. Maybe he can make it work. If not he'll know a way it doesn't work.

Koen1

@nightlife:
Well it's an interesting approach... but somewhat similar to the "Newman coil"
experiments some people did a few years back, where they also had a smaller
coil inside a larger one, in some cases with and in others without permanent
magnets... Their smaller coils also "jumped" (the coil arrangement was usually
oriented vertically) and some claimed ou power. But then it kind of died,
and this is the first I've seen of it since.

How do you allow for movement of the smaller coil, while maintaining an electrical
connection?
Or is the "trick" you're using to "tap" the smaller coils energy by direct induction
into the surrounding larger coil? ("wireless" current transfer)

For some reason I tend to prefer full solid state devices with no moving parts,
and that includes smaller coils moving back and forth...
Instead of moving the coil back and forth, could we not have the smaller coil
sit fixed, with fixed connections, and have a controller circuit move the connections
back and forth?
It's just a wild idea and I haven't actually thought it through yet, it just occurred to me...
You know, like they used to do in the early radios; they used a coil that was connected
to a fixed point on one end, and an adjustable electrode that could be slid up or down
over the coil, so that it only made contact with a specific winding of the coil. This way,
the coil could effectively be made lnger and shorter at will, and this allowed the operator
to tune into different frequencies. Now I'm not proposing to actually use this type
of tuner, but I am referring to the mechanism for changing coil length.
If we were to make two of such adjustable or "slidable" connectors at a fixed distance
from eachother, we could slide both at the same time, which seems to be effectively
similar to moving a smaller coil of that fixed length back and forth. Ok, so far the
analogy with moving parts.
Now for a solid state version of this, instead of physically sliding the connectors
to another position to effectively slide the entire "coil" to that position, we could
make a number of permanent connections to the coil, and have a controller circuit
"shift" through the different connections in a similar way...
Again, it is just a wild suggestion, and if I work the idea out it may very well
turn out that it doesn't have the desired effect at all.

As for the new battery, I have not heard anything about that...
I have heard of a "new" "battery" to be used in cars, but it is actually not
a new battery at all, it is just an old battery with a better type of dielectric
for isolation. The dielecric used is claimed to be ferroelectric, but I am a little
sceptical about that... After all, if they're using ferroelectric plate seperators,
they would theoretically have a ferroelectric capacitor, and as we know
a properly built ferroelectric capacitor circuit can be used to transduce
environmental heat into elecal output, making it an electricity-producing
air cooling unit...
And the exact right type of ferroelectric capacitor to do that is not commercially
available anywhere; it has been said that the US army actually restricted
production in the US.
Anyway, if it were anything "cutting edge" like that, it would probably be classified
and surely be mentioned in the ads ("Our battery also cools your engine and produces
excess energy. Even if the engine is not hot to begin with."), and besides that
there would be much better uses for such tech than using it merely as a car battery.
(I imagine refrigerators with a power outlet in the side and an energy saving lamp
above it, which just sits there fridging your food, turning the absorbed heat into power,
and you can just walk up to it and plug in your pc... ;))
(http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/nzaevncp.htm for info on that concept)