Steven Mark´s associate Jack Durban comes forward with more info !

[aleks]

It only take volts not current to make depletion but the result is volts with amps coming back.

You do not get me it seems. You are describing second order effects while I'm trying to turn your head toward the possible source of the energy. In all situations of depletion what you are doing is creating a turmoil in atomic lattice of surrounding matter that leads to phonon-level collisions between atoms. During constant electric flow the atoms take their comfortable positions and so nothing fancy happens. The alike collisions happen in sonoluminescence effect when the sides of an overly compressed bubble come into contact in oscillatory manner after resonance is achieved. This releases enormous amounts of blue light energy. This is an OU device in layman's terms. According to my hypothesis the cause of this is that during implosions an anti-gravity field is created. Gravity is thought to be as ultra small power, but I believe it is so because it is not understood well. In normal conditions gravity is a negligible force, but it does not mean you can't change it to a considerable deviation where it becomes heavier and so influences matter in not so conventional ways.

As for the current flowing into several directions in the same wire this should not be a problem with a correct setup as it is known that electron flow happens on the edges of a wire. So, all you need is to create such edges on internal layers. It's the same thing as your average coaxial cable: you may use the core wire and shielding independently. This does not require existence of some 'strange' electrons.

Electrons are really just energy-carrying particles. When we are talking about a static electricity I believe what we are really doing is talking about average kinetic energy difference between arrays of free electrons contained in two different volumes of matter. When these volumes come into contact the energy is proportionally equalized and it is during this flow of energy when you can take some of it to do a useful work.

[sparks]

The flow may not be normal, but it should be related to electrons if we are dealing with solid state conductors.

im not sure they are identical but they still pass through wires caps and coils. You fly a kite during a thunder storm chances are it will be hit by lightning and will lead straight back down to earth if the kite flies on copper wire. The energy only exist while the static charge is making up for the depletion of charge on the negative side for the time it takes to equalize the depletion. I don't know how one would calculate this but i bet the energy required to create the thunderstorm power is insignificant to the energy released when the PD decides its enough to bring itself back to parity which clearly is in the thousands mega watts range. This is natures OU device. In other words the storm clouds are the catalysts so to speak there is NOT megawatts floating inside of that cloud par se.

People of said for many years we only need to harness the power of lightning to power a city. Tesla knew and did this all those years ago. He realized the real power was NOT in the clouds but occurs when the charge is moving rapidly to cover the depletion. Therefore all one has to do is create a constant depletion and pull the static charges apart and the power will flow. It only takes voltage of this type to create the depletion. Bearden says the same. If you create a dipole you have all the energy you even wanted but ONLY if you do not allow the dipole to collapse..

     The voltage gradient inside the tpu ring forms a low pressure area which aetheric potential energy attempts to fill.  It encounters the torroidal coil which reflects this input and sets up an oscillation.  By creating a spin componenet in the oscillations you effectively create matter which is a potential energy storage unit.  The problem being as you collect more and more potential energy in this new form of matter you get overloading of the circuits that create the reflections and she gets hot and needs to be shut down SLOWLY or you get an EMP shock wave.  The other method is to off tune the reflection and should be accomplished with feedback circuits that are responding to the amount of energy stored in the mass at a high frequency interval and low reactive interval.

[bolt]

"while I'm trying to turn your head toward the possible source of the energy."

Im not sure its even important. SM did not know exactly where the energy for the TPU comes from. We can all speculate that is gravitational or Schumann resonance or static electricity or gravitons or or or whatever. It doesn't really matter. I think you are getting so deep in the theory it becomes a hypothesis rather then whats actually required to make it happen. Instead of describing an internal combustion engine with air and fuel mix going in with resultant force applied to the pistons you are trying to justify the argument at atomic level at the point of explosion to justify why gas burns to provide the energy. Even of you get this part correct you still don't know how the engine works but neither did it prevent any of the other inventors producing their technology. Because non of them truly understood what was given this power they all called it something different like Radiant Energy or Cold Electricity or something.

[aleks]

Because non of them truly understood what was given this power they all called it something different like Radiant Energy or Cold Electricity or something.

You are right, but I do not see a schematic released under GPL that works in 100% of replication cases. What I'm personally trying to do is to offer some base on which such schematic can stay. In the essence I'm limiting levels of freedom concerning these devices. If this is not done, no way a 100% working schematic can be created. As you've noted with combustion engine, as everybody knows a base of its functioning everyone can make it with some effort, from the scratch. With TPU it's not the case. I do not see a reason to be angry on my hypotheses: I'm at no power to convince anybody they are correct. I only hope they'll lead someone in a fruitful direction.

[mikestocks2006]

The question is,
Is there a BEMF opposing the movement of the magnet, when the magnet is moved ALONG (parallel) to the straight piece of wire, and the ands of the wire are connected to a load?

If there is no BEMF, then this is OU.

So then, in the torroid, the secondary is the core  and the collector at the same time?
Is the rest simply timing to get the field to move, instead of a straight line, in a circle, in this case rotate over (along and around) the collector.?