Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



A truly overunity Transformer / Meg

Started by LoganBaker, March 17, 2008, 06:32:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Getca

Hi, all inventors...

QuoteI simply wanted to ask you if you know these two persons, because it is my geuss that this is originated from a eastern country .

Regards

Kator01
Kator01, unfortunately I don't know these persons.

Ergo, it seems, You are quite...self-confident to claim that...
QuoteJust before the Spark "ignites" there is a high voltage present but this is
short circuited down to almost zero volt when the Spark crosses the bridge. This is regular welding technique used by any everyday welding station.

No comment, like the people say. Just get an oscilloscope, carefully see the Voltage/Current pictures on/via any kind of spark gap and then I will be  ready to dicuss.

Well, sorry, but nothing personally to You...O, You are an educated, but sceptic person, I see...I am too... ;D


winsonali

these MEG circuits will not work as they are not swapping the direction of magnetic field they are just putting impact on magnitude this will saturate the core very quickly and will reduce the effect very strongly  ultimately the power generated will be equal to power output or if there is any extra power again it will not last for long .
until and unless the direction of the magnetic field is completely changing  we will not be able to produce revers curve of BH characteristics which enables the core material to remain neutral.

   

winsonali

Charles Flynn parallel path technique will be very good to produce PM magnetic mechanical force switching on and off but this technique cannot be used for the purpose of electricity generation.

once again the same reason the frequency required to generate the electric power is very at least 50 hz and the core material saturates in one direction this is the reason why we need to change the direction of flux to neutralize this effect
this is not possible in this arrangement as both the magnets are in same direction.
but one thing is for sure that if we will develop a motor with this technique that will perform very good
coz that deals with magneto mechanical force not magneto electrical force.   

gyulasun

Quote from: winsonali on December 04, 2009, 01:47:28 PM
these MEG circuits will not work as they are not swapping the direction of magnetic field they are just putting impact on magnitude this will saturate the core very quickly and will reduce the effect very strongly  ultimately the power generated will be equal to power output or if there is any extra power again it will not last for long .
until and unless the direction of the magnetic field is completely changing  we will not be able to produce revers curve of BH characteristics which enables the core material to remain neutral.


Hi Ali,

If I understand correctly the Bulgarian MEG operation is based on pure saturation, the input energy saturates a closed magnetic core and this closed core is embedded into another closed magnetic circuit that has a permanent magnet as an independent source of magnetomotive force. And by bringing the input core into and then out of saturation, the flux strength changes accordingly between a minimum (input energy saturates its own core) and a maximum (input energy is off).   It is true the flux always changes between the same limits and in the setups shown the flux does not change poles  direction in the main flux path driven by the permanent magnet.
So my question is: does this lack of change in the flux direction rules out a COP>1 with this setup? 

See this link here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4300.msg134670#msg134670

Maybe by changing this setup to make the flux (coming from the permanent magnet) change its pole directions you miss, even better COPs could be reached.

Regards, Gyula