New proof and blueprints on how to properly sheild magnets

[eavogels]

I didn't think about it before bur this shielding idea is exactly the kind of shielding that Lloyd Zirbes used in his 'Flux-o-matic'.
The shields around the magnets on the rotor and the stator releases mostly just the repelling forces what makes the device work.

The blueprints and cad assemblies of the flux--matic are here: http://www.fdp.nu/zirbes/default.asp

The most asked question I get is: did someone make the FLux-o-matic yet? And I must answer: not that I know. The only one who build it, was Lloyd Zirbes himself, accoording to the interviews I heard.

Eric.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Thanks for the link eavogels...

He was also a geomagnetic researcher...here is what he had to say aboutf HAARP...

" Zirbes strongly opposed the technology utilized in the HAARP system. He wrote, 'Disruption of the Earth's magnetic field will complete damages to the planet's balance done by the government nuclear bomb blasts in the natural radiation belts above the ionosphere. Earth's magnetic field keeps the planet in balance with the moon and sun. Disrupting the field will be the last straw in sending Earth into the sun or out into space."

Regards...

[eavogels]

Now and then people contact me that they cannot read the figures on the drawings of the Flux-o-matic.
I now invested in proffesional scanning and I put the drawings here:

fdp.nu/shared/manager.asp?d=files\Flux-o-matic\

[What_The_Flux]

I am just starting to experiment with shielding, so I would appreciate any comments on my conclusions so far.
For the record, I am not a nay-sayer, but an engineer seeking the same thing the rest of you are.

But after looking at the above youtube shielding video, and investigating the Perendev concept, right now my data and gut instinct are telling me that shielding does not bring us any closer to over unity.

Shielding definitely insulates magnetic fields and creates an asymmetrical field around a magnet, but all this is doing is a combination of attenuating part of the field and shifting the location and geometry of the field. A rotor magnet traveling through the flux field still appears to face equal net attraction/repulsion force when entering then exiting a field.

This also passes my sanity (?) check, if you consider that even the most complex magnet and shielding arrangement still has a definable set of flux lines which all start and end at the magnet assembly. Whether a moving magnet is going straight through the field, on an arc, or non-linearly. It still passes the same flux density going in as it does going out.

Experimenting with Perendev-type magnets (and believe me, it's not easy cutting or grinding neodymium), I find that the shielding does allow the two magnets to approach more easily from one direction. But as they approach the same axis, the resistance is amplified, greater than if the magnets were unshielded. The total net force appears to be the same for the rotor moving in either direction. If the Perendev concept is sound, we should be able to isolate the concept with just two magnets.

So far I am still looking for evidence of a true magnetic 'gate', where force in one direction is different from the other.

Please let me know if you have some experiments that prove me wrong. I'm looking forward to sharing and learning from everybody.

Bob

[What_The_Flux]

<sorry, accidently duplicated previous>