Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

Started by pauldude000, April 09, 2008, 08:35:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

pauldude000

Concerning Radiant Energy and Tesla:

You know what they say, "A picture is worth a thousand words", AND "The best place to get information is directly from the horses mouth". Lets see who will listen to Tesla himself.

A quote from his patent # 685958 "Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy":



"Minute particles of matter which are strongly electrified........."

I said before, I say again, read the original patent quoted in the last post, then read this one. His device in his own words, IN BOTH PATENTS, works according to ionizing radiation, like it or not.

The problem with so much interpretation of Tesla's words are that one person puts in his two bits, another follows and puts in his two bits, and before you know it, for every dollars worth of information claimed to be from him Tesla only owns two cents. Everyone then claims that Tesla was the complete author, when generally his contribution was a partially misunderstood concept and his name.

Tesla himself would be shaking his head, exasperated in complete disbelief if he could see all the BS people attribute to him today.

Paul Andrulis
Finding truth can be compared to panning for gold. It generally entails sifting a huge amount of material for each nugget found. Then checking each nugget found for valuable metal or fool's gold.

aleks

Quote from: pauldude000 on July 02, 2008, 04:22:43 AMTesla himself would be shaking his head, exasperated in complete disbelief if he could see all the BS people attribute to him today.
Of course, I've read the patent. And your confusion is understandable. Well, maybe I'm incorrect in assuming Tesla EVER thought of something along the lines I'm writting myself. But the talk about producing some kind of "shield" is something to note - this is mentioned in some sources in relation to Tesla. Maybe it's not about "radiant energy shield". But then again you do not know what this "RE antenna" really "pumped in". If it's not in production today there are two possibilities: either it does not work or nobody knows how it really works. Beside that, my insights do not rely on fantasy only. I'm not trying to convince anybody by "injecting" authority of Tesla or someone else. I'm just trying to find "parallels". Again, no need to accuse anybody - it's counter-productive. Trying to accuse me I'm wanting to "gain" anything in these freelance internet forum discussions is a plain paranoia. Things are "gained" in a scientific environment, in conferences and publications in Nature, Scientific American, etc. Patents are also used for "gain". Get real.

Grumpy

Tesla said many things:

Quote
I asked Dr. Tesla if his plan for transmission of power between planets involved the use of cosmic rays, and he stated that the two projects have no connection whatever. He stated that he has continued his experimental work in the laboratory on the interplanetary power transmission project and is certain of its feasibility.

Are Radiant Energy and Radiant Electricty two different things?

It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

aleks

Quote from: Grumpy on July 02, 2008, 10:20:00 AMAre Radiant Energy and Radiant Electricty two different things?
Yep, Radiant Electricity is close to what I'm writing myself:
http://www.communicationagents.com/chris/2003/06/06/ramifications_of_free_energytesla_and_others.htm

"No reversal of current was permissible, else the effect would not manifest."

One interesting idea... What if one can "pump in" more charge into capacitor than usual? Radiant Energy patent also tells about "cracking" capacitors when they are overcharged. Seems like it is important. I.e. striking an already charged capacitor with more energy.

"Tesla found it impossible to measure a diminution in radiant force at several hundred yards..."

Grumpy

Quote from: aleks on July 02, 2008, 10:52:11 AM
Yep, Radiant Electricity is close to what I'm writing myself:
http://www.communicationagents.com/chris/2003/06/06/ramifications_of_free_energytesla_and_others.htm

"No reversal of current was permissible, else the effect would not manifest."

One interesting idea... What if one can "pump in" more charge into capacitor than usual? Radiant Energy patent also tells about "cracking" capacitors when they are overcharged. Seems like it is important. I.e. striking an already charged capacitor with more energy.

"Tesla found it impossible to measure a diminution in radiant force at several hundred yards..."

Exactly.  Radiant electricity is aften confused with radiant energy - especially when one uses "RE" which can men either one.

"Pumping" more charge into a capacitor than usual is what Bedini speaks of when charging capacitors and batteries with RE.  Now, when we look at what goes on in a capacitor we see that it is the "dielectric" material that is "stressed" or "polarized" or "altered" - the conductive plates merely provide a means to access the dielectric.  The "change" is stored in the dielectric.  So, if the energy changing the dielectric were to somehow be more efficient then you would get more charge in the capacitor.

The "tempic" field declines with distance - not the distance squared like electric charge and not the distnce cubed like magnetic fields - just the distance - so it is ideal for communications and any other transmissions between two points.  Of course we don't need to transmit energy between points if we can just collect it at the point where we need it.
It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards