Young Bangladeshi Scientist's success story Power generation without fuel

pennies_everywhere · June 23, 2008, 07:57:41 PM

@Grumpy, reasonable people believe that energy cannot be created or destroyed because there is no evidence that it can. Provide some evidence that energy can be created or destroyed and there will be something to talk about.

I highly doubt the AEC was ever interested in Steven Mark's simple inverter. It's a nice project for 14 year old's. Where is there a credible reference to the visit by the AEC you claim?

Quote from: Grumpy on June 23, 2008, 04:52:37 PM
@ Pennies

If energy an not be created or destroyed, then how did this energy come to be in the first place?

If Steven Mark's device was powered by a battery why did the Atomic Energy Comission come talk to him?

Grumpy · June 23, 2008, 08:12:02 PM

Quote from: pennies_everywhere on June 23, 2008, 07:57:41 PM
@Grumpy, reasonable people believe that energy cannot be created or destroyed because there is no evidence that it can. Provide some evidence that energy can be created or destroyed and there will be something to talk about.

I highly doubt the AEC was ever interested in Steven Mark's simple inverter. It's a nice project for 14 year old's. Where is there a credible reference to the visit by the AEC you claim?

If energy can not be created or destroyed then how is it that we are here at all? Where did it all come from? Big Bang? How is it that there was anything to cause a big bang?

SM himself claimed that the AEC stopped by for a chat. This is no different than any other claim that can not be proven without evididence.

pennies_everywhere · June 23, 2008, 08:56:25 PM

@Grumpy, lacking answers for questions that are today a matter of existential philosophy does not in the slightest change the collective experience. The collective experience of mankind is that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Until there is evidence otherwise one can take CoE to the bank all day long.

WRT Steven Marks, his self-serving claims do not credible evidence make. If you like to accept claims on faith without the slightest bit of supporting evidence, then perhaps you like to purchase a ride over the Grand Canyon on Mary Yugo's invisible pink unicorn. I'll be happy to take your deposit.

Quote from: Grumpy on June 23, 2008, 08:12:02 PM
If energy can not be created or destroyed then how is it that we are here at all? Where did it all come from? Big Bang? How is it that there was anything to cause a big bang?

SM himself claimed that the AEC stopped by for a chat. This is no different than any other claim that can not be proven without evididence.

allcanadian · June 23, 2008, 11:07:32 PM

@pennies_everywhere
LOL, Sorry I must be a little off today (back from holidays)as it took me a while to understand your predicament. You really have no idea how to do this do you? I mean build a circuit like Katchi's.You make some good points in your posts but are still stuck on COE, that was never in question. So I'll try to spell this out for you, ----there is no overunity--never was

There is no violation of COE--people who copy others work and make up BS for the general public are responsible for this. I would suggest reading the some of T.H Morays papers and Teslas papers on Currents of high frequency and potential. Honestly this is not as hard as you think it is once you understand what it is your dealing with.

pennies_everywhere · June 23, 2008, 11:17:05 PM

@Allcanadian, oh my what a terrible predicament living by logic and reason are! The burden is soooo great.

I am quite familiar with Tesla. His work at CO Springs and Wardencliff was about efficient coupling. Tesla was fascinated with resonant systems. At frequencies which align with system zeroes the impedance drops to a low level. That level can be orders of magnitude lower than at other frequencies. That increases the coupling of energy. It doesn't create any. It doesn't tap the aether. It doesn't tap ZPE. It just couples very conventional EM fields.

But of course you disagree and know so much better, seeing as you power your home, your car, and all manner of other devices with all the free energy you get from high voltage resonators, don't you? Oh, that's right, you don't.

Quote from: allcanadian on June 23, 2008, 11:07:32 PM
@pennies_everywhere
LOL, Sorry I must be a little off today (back from holidays)as it took me a while to understand your predicament. You really have no idea how to do this do you? I mean build a circuit like Katchi's.You make some good points in your posts but are still stuck on COE, that was never in question. So I'll try to spell this out for you, ----there is no overunity--never was There is no violation of COE--people who copy others work and make up BS for the general public are responsible for this. I would suggest reading the some of T.H Morays papers and Teslas papers on Currents of high frequency and potential. Honestly this is not as hard as you think it is once you understand what it is your dealing with.